The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata

This study analyzes the responses of performances of BankMandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata to merger strategy.This paper harnesses the quantitative approach with structuralbreak analysis method and impulse response function. Theplausible findings indicate that the merger of Bank Permataproduce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Murti Lestari, Lincolin Arsyad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2010-05-01
Series:Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/article/view/5510
id doaj-ad7f1cfdfbd34aa691cdd753d65c5047
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad7f1cfdfbd34aa691cdd753d65c50472020-11-24T21:36:00ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaGadjah Mada International Journal of Business1411-11282338-72382010-05-0112223125510.22146/gamaijb.55104836The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank PermataMurti Lestari0Lincolin ArsyadFaculty of Business, Duta Wacana Christian UniversityThis study analyzes the responses of performances of BankMandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata to merger strategy.This paper harnesses the quantitative approach with structuralbreak analysis method and impulse response function. Theplausible findings indicate that the merger of Bank Permataproduces a better performance response in comparison to theconsolidation of Bank Mandiri and the merger of Bank Danamon.The merger of Bank Permata does not result in performanceshocks, and the structural break does not prevail either. On theother hand, the consolidation of Bank Mandiri and the mergerof Bank Danamon result in structural breaks, particularly in thespread performance. In order to return to the stable position, themergers of Bank Mandiri and Bank Danamon require a longertime than does the merger of Bank Permata. This researchindicates that for large banks, the mergers and acquisitions(retaining one existing bank) will deliver a better performanceresponse than will the consolidations (no existing bank). Keywords: impulse response function; merger; structural breakhttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/article/view/5510
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Murti Lestari
Lincolin Arsyad
spellingShingle Murti Lestari
Lincolin Arsyad
The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
author_facet Murti Lestari
Lincolin Arsyad
author_sort Murti Lestari
title The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata
title_short The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata
title_full The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata
title_fullStr The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata
title_full_unstemmed The Response of Performance to Merger Strategy in Indonesian Banking Industry: Analyses on Bank Mandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata
title_sort response of performance to merger strategy in indonesian banking industry: analyses on bank mandiri, bank danamon, and bank permata
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
issn 1411-1128
2338-7238
publishDate 2010-05-01
description This study analyzes the responses of performances of BankMandiri, Bank Danamon, and Bank Permata to merger strategy.This paper harnesses the quantitative approach with structuralbreak analysis method and impulse response function. Theplausible findings indicate that the merger of Bank Permataproduces a better performance response in comparison to theconsolidation of Bank Mandiri and the merger of Bank Danamon.The merger of Bank Permata does not result in performanceshocks, and the structural break does not prevail either. On theother hand, the consolidation of Bank Mandiri and the mergerof Bank Danamon result in structural breaks, particularly in thespread performance. In order to return to the stable position, themergers of Bank Mandiri and Bank Danamon require a longertime than does the merger of Bank Permata. This researchindicates that for large banks, the mergers and acquisitions(retaining one existing bank) will deliver a better performanceresponse than will the consolidations (no existing bank). Keywords: impulse response function; merger; structural break
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/article/view/5510
work_keys_str_mv AT murtilestari theresponseofperformancetomergerstrategyinindonesianbankingindustryanalysesonbankmandiribankdanamonandbankpermata
AT lincolinarsyad theresponseofperformancetomergerstrategyinindonesianbankingindustryanalysesonbankmandiribankdanamonandbankpermata
AT murtilestari responseofperformancetomergerstrategyinindonesianbankingindustryanalysesonbankmandiribankdanamonandbankpermata
AT lincolinarsyad responseofperformancetomergerstrategyinindonesianbankingindustryanalysesonbankmandiribankdanamonandbankpermata
_version_ 1725942874809303040