Efficacy risks of the minimal-invasive plastic and reconstructive neovagina Vecchietti technique in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome

• Main Authors: Cezar, Cristina, Devassy, Rajesh, Larbig, Angelika, De Wilde, Rudy Leon
• Format: Article
• Language: deu
• Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2014-12-01
• Series: GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW
• Subjects: Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome; Vecchietti technique; laparoscopic neovagina; sexual function; efficacy risks
• Online Access: http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/iprs/2014-3/iprs000054.shtml

Introduction: Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a congenital disorder clinically defined by primary amenorrhea and infertility, congenital aplasia of the uterus and upper vagina. The patients with MRKH-syndrome have a female karyotype (46, XX), normally functioning ovaries and regular development of secondary sexual characters. Generally, the initial clinical sign of the syndrome is the failure to begin the menstrual cycle. Even though the psychological impact of the disease may be overwhelming, its physiological disorder can be successfully treated, after the surgical intervention the patients being able to have a normal sexual function. Reproduction may also be possible with assisted techniques. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy risks of the traditional laparoscopic Vecchietti method in the plastic and reconstructive treatment of vaginal agenesis, documenting complications, as well as anatomical and functional results by means of a prospective, single center, single arm study. Material and methods: Between 2003 and 2011, 53 patients with MRKH-syndrome were treated in the gynecological clinic of the Kochi’s Lakshmi Hospital, Kerala, India. All the patients suffered from primary amenorrhea and the karyotype was (46, XX). The clinical suspicion was confirmed sonographically and intraoperatively, showing an absent uterus or the presence of rudimentary uterine horns, with normal ovaries. All the patients received a plastic laparoscopic neovagina construction, in order to achieve a satisfactory sexual function. We adopted a combined strategy: the patients were prepared by a psychological counselling, followed by the surgical intervention and a postoperative follow-up. The surgical procedure used in this series was a laparoscopic modified Vecchietti’s technique. All the patients were dismissed with the obligation to have intercourse and/or vaginal dilation 3 times a week for 6 months. Results: The patients’ ages varied between 13 and 40 years, with a mean age of 25 years. The mean operation time was 42.3 minutes, with a range between 36 and 63 minutes. In 2 cases, an intraoperative bladder injury occurred. A good qualitative vaginal tissue was clinically achieved in all the patients. The mean follow up period of the patients was 4 years ranging from 1 to 5 years. The anatomic success was observed in 94% of the cases and functional success in 79%. Conclusion: The anatomical failures in 6% were in women not having regular intercourse or not performing vaginal dilatation postoperatively. The psychological impact of the disease in combination with the performed surgery seems responsible for the difference of 15% of the cases where the anatomical result was good, but no regular intercourse could be achieved. The minimal-invasive plastic and reconstructive neovagina Vecchietti technique in MRKH-syndrome has a high success rate. In case of an intraoperative urinary bladder injury, the repair can be performed laparoscopically during the same session. Qualitatively good vaginal tissue and anatomical reconstruction can easily be achieved. In one patient desiring assisted reproductive medicine, a transvaginal oocyte retrieval was achieved.