Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion Diagnosis
Knowing when a machine learning system is not confident about its prediction is crucial in medical domains where safety is critical. Ideally, a machine learning algorithm should make a prediction only when it is highly certain about its competency, and refer the case to physicians otherwise. In this...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/8/1241 |
id |
doaj-ad6a133255994d8e8b04115012b805f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ad6a133255994d8e8b04115012b805f12020-11-25T01:56:33ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832019-08-0188124110.3390/jcm8081241jcm8081241Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion DiagnosisAryan Mobiny0Aditi Singh1Hien Van Nguyen2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USAKnowing when a machine learning system is not confident about its prediction is crucial in medical domains where safety is critical. Ideally, a machine learning algorithm should make a prediction only when it is highly certain about its competency, and refer the case to physicians otherwise. In this paper, we investigate how Bayesian deep learning can improve the performance of the machine−physician team in the skin lesion classification task. We used the publicly available HAM10000 dataset, which includes samples from seven common skin lesion categories: Melanoma (MEL), Melanocytic Nevi (NV), Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Actinic Keratoses and Intraepithelial Carcinoma (AKIEC), Benign Keratosis (BKL), Dermatofibroma (DF), and Vascular (VASC) lesions. Our experimental results show that Bayesian deep networks can boost the diagnostic performance of the standard DenseNet-169 model from 81.35% to 83.59% without incurring additional parameters or heavy computation. More importantly, a hybrid physician−machine workflow reaches a classification accuracy of <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>90</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> while only referring <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>35</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> of the cases to physicians. The findings are expected to generalize to other medical diagnosis applications. We believe that the availability of risk-aware machine learning methods will enable a wider adoption of machine learning technology in clinical settings.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/8/1241Bayesian deep networkmodel uncertaintyMonte Carlo dropoutphysician-friendly machine learningskin lesion |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aryan Mobiny Aditi Singh Hien Van Nguyen |
spellingShingle |
Aryan Mobiny Aditi Singh Hien Van Nguyen Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion Diagnosis Journal of Clinical Medicine Bayesian deep network model uncertainty Monte Carlo dropout physician-friendly machine learning skin lesion |
author_facet |
Aryan Mobiny Aditi Singh Hien Van Nguyen |
author_sort |
Aryan Mobiny |
title |
Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion Diagnosis |
title_short |
Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion Diagnosis |
title_full |
Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion Diagnosis |
title_fullStr |
Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk-Aware Machine Learning Classifier for Skin Lesion Diagnosis |
title_sort |
risk-aware machine learning classifier for skin lesion diagnosis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Knowing when a machine learning system is not confident about its prediction is crucial in medical domains where safety is critical. Ideally, a machine learning algorithm should make a prediction only when it is highly certain about its competency, and refer the case to physicians otherwise. In this paper, we investigate how Bayesian deep learning can improve the performance of the machine−physician team in the skin lesion classification task. We used the publicly available HAM10000 dataset, which includes samples from seven common skin lesion categories: Melanoma (MEL), Melanocytic Nevi (NV), Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Actinic Keratoses and Intraepithelial Carcinoma (AKIEC), Benign Keratosis (BKL), Dermatofibroma (DF), and Vascular (VASC) lesions. Our experimental results show that Bayesian deep networks can boost the diagnostic performance of the standard DenseNet-169 model from 81.35% to 83.59% without incurring additional parameters or heavy computation. More importantly, a hybrid physician−machine workflow reaches a classification accuracy of <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>90</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> while only referring <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>35</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> of the cases to physicians. The findings are expected to generalize to other medical diagnosis applications. We believe that the availability of risk-aware machine learning methods will enable a wider adoption of machine learning technology in clinical settings. |
topic |
Bayesian deep network model uncertainty Monte Carlo dropout physician-friendly machine learning skin lesion |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/8/1241 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aryanmobiny riskawaremachinelearningclassifierforskinlesiondiagnosis AT aditisingh riskawaremachinelearningclassifierforskinlesiondiagnosis AT hienvannguyen riskawaremachinelearningclassifierforskinlesiondiagnosis |
_version_ |
1724979421044015104 |