Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.
BACKGROUND:Screening pregnant women for HIV and syphilis is recommended by WHO in order to reduce mother-to-child transmission. We evaluated the field performance, feasibility, and acceptability of a dual rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HIV and syphilis test in antenatal clinic settings in Nigeria....
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6038984?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-ad6849ca655345deb9e8c99523b4b284 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ad6849ca655345deb9e8c99523b4b2842020-11-25T02:06:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e019869810.1371/journal.pone.0198698Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.Ijaodola OlugbengaOyelade TaiwoMaura LavertyEvelyn NgigeChukwuma AnyaikeRasheed BakareVeronica OgunleyeBrandy L Peterson MaddoxDaniel R NewmanHarriet D GliddonEugenia OfonduStephen Nurse-FindlayMelanie M TaylorBACKGROUND:Screening pregnant women for HIV and syphilis is recommended by WHO in order to reduce mother-to-child transmission. We evaluated the field performance, feasibility, and acceptability of a dual rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HIV and syphilis test in antenatal clinic settings in Nigeria. METHODS AND FINDINGS:Participants were recruited at 12 antenatal clinic sites in three states of Nigeria. All consenting individuals were tested according to the national HIV testing algorithm, as well as a dual RDT, the SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test (Alere, USA), in the clinic. To determine sensitivity, specificity and concordance, whole blood samples were obtained for repeat RDT performance in the laboratory, as well as reference tests for HIV and syphilis. Dual test acceptability and operational characteristics were assessed among participants and clinic staff. The prevalence of HIV among the 4,551 enrollees was 3.0% (138/4551) using the national clinic-based HIV testing algorithm. Positive and negative percent agreement of the HIV component of the dual RDT were 100.0% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) respectively, when compared with the national rapid testing algorithm. The prevalence of syphilis, using TPHA as the reference test, was low at 0.09% (4/4550). The sensitivity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT could not be calculated as no positive results were observed for patients that were positive for syphilis by TPHA. Each of the only four TPHA-positive specimens had RPR titers of 1:1 (neat), indicative of non-active syphilis. The specificity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-100.0). The dual RDT received favorable feasibility ratings among antenatal care clinic staff. Acceptability among study participants was high with most women reporting preference for rapid dual HIV/syphilis testing. CONCLUSIONS:The SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test showed a high overall diagnostic accuracy for HIV and a high specificity for syphilis diagnosis in antenatal clinic settings. This study adds to a growing body of evidence that supports the clinic-based use of dual tests for HIV and syphilis among pregnant women.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6038984?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ijaodola Olugbenga Oyelade Taiwo Maura Laverty Evelyn Ngige Chukwuma Anyaike Rasheed Bakare Veronica Ogunleye Brandy L Peterson Maddox Daniel R Newman Harriet D Gliddon Eugenia Ofondu Stephen Nurse-Findlay Melanie M Taylor |
spellingShingle |
Ijaodola Olugbenga Oyelade Taiwo Maura Laverty Evelyn Ngige Chukwuma Anyaike Rasheed Bakare Veronica Ogunleye Brandy L Peterson Maddox Daniel R Newman Harriet D Gliddon Eugenia Ofondu Stephen Nurse-Findlay Melanie M Taylor Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Ijaodola Olugbenga Oyelade Taiwo Maura Laverty Evelyn Ngige Chukwuma Anyaike Rasheed Bakare Veronica Ogunleye Brandy L Peterson Maddox Daniel R Newman Harriet D Gliddon Eugenia Ofondu Stephen Nurse-Findlay Melanie M Taylor |
author_sort |
Ijaodola Olugbenga |
title |
Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria. |
title_short |
Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria. |
title_full |
Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria. |
title_fullStr |
Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria. |
title_sort |
clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of hiv and syphilis in pregnant women in nigeria. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND:Screening pregnant women for HIV and syphilis is recommended by WHO in order to reduce mother-to-child transmission. We evaluated the field performance, feasibility, and acceptability of a dual rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HIV and syphilis test in antenatal clinic settings in Nigeria. METHODS AND FINDINGS:Participants were recruited at 12 antenatal clinic sites in three states of Nigeria. All consenting individuals were tested according to the national HIV testing algorithm, as well as a dual RDT, the SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test (Alere, USA), in the clinic. To determine sensitivity, specificity and concordance, whole blood samples were obtained for repeat RDT performance in the laboratory, as well as reference tests for HIV and syphilis. Dual test acceptability and operational characteristics were assessed among participants and clinic staff. The prevalence of HIV among the 4,551 enrollees was 3.0% (138/4551) using the national clinic-based HIV testing algorithm. Positive and negative percent agreement of the HIV component of the dual RDT were 100.0% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) respectively, when compared with the national rapid testing algorithm. The prevalence of syphilis, using TPHA as the reference test, was low at 0.09% (4/4550). The sensitivity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT could not be calculated as no positive results were observed for patients that were positive for syphilis by TPHA. Each of the only four TPHA-positive specimens had RPR titers of 1:1 (neat), indicative of non-active syphilis. The specificity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-100.0). The dual RDT received favorable feasibility ratings among antenatal care clinic staff. Acceptability among study participants was high with most women reporting preference for rapid dual HIV/syphilis testing. CONCLUSIONS:The SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test showed a high overall diagnostic accuracy for HIV and a high specificity for syphilis diagnosis in antenatal clinic settings. This study adds to a growing body of evidence that supports the clinic-based use of dual tests for HIV and syphilis among pregnant women. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6038984?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ijaodolaolugbenga clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT oyeladetaiwo clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT mauralaverty clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT evelynngige clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT chukwumaanyaike clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT rasheedbakare clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT veronicaogunleye clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT brandylpetersonmaddox clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT danielrnewman clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT harrietdgliddon clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT eugeniaofondu clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT stephennursefindlay clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria AT melaniemtaylor clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria |
_version_ |
1724933993544024064 |