Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND:Screening pregnant women for HIV and syphilis is recommended by WHO in order to reduce mother-to-child transmission. We evaluated the field performance, feasibility, and acceptability of a dual rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HIV and syphilis test in antenatal clinic settings in Nigeria....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ijaodola Olugbenga, Oyelade Taiwo, Maura Laverty, Evelyn Ngige, Chukwuma Anyaike, Rasheed Bakare, Veronica Ogunleye, Brandy L Peterson Maddox, Daniel R Newman, Harriet D Gliddon, Eugenia Ofondu, Stephen Nurse-Findlay, Melanie M Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6038984?pdf=render
id doaj-ad6849ca655345deb9e8c99523b4b284
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad6849ca655345deb9e8c99523b4b2842020-11-25T02:06:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e019869810.1371/journal.pone.0198698Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.Ijaodola OlugbengaOyelade TaiwoMaura LavertyEvelyn NgigeChukwuma AnyaikeRasheed BakareVeronica OgunleyeBrandy L Peterson MaddoxDaniel R NewmanHarriet D GliddonEugenia OfonduStephen Nurse-FindlayMelanie M TaylorBACKGROUND:Screening pregnant women for HIV and syphilis is recommended by WHO in order to reduce mother-to-child transmission. We evaluated the field performance, feasibility, and acceptability of a dual rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HIV and syphilis test in antenatal clinic settings in Nigeria. METHODS AND FINDINGS:Participants were recruited at 12 antenatal clinic sites in three states of Nigeria. All consenting individuals were tested according to the national HIV testing algorithm, as well as a dual RDT, the SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test (Alere, USA), in the clinic. To determine sensitivity, specificity and concordance, whole blood samples were obtained for repeat RDT performance in the laboratory, as well as reference tests for HIV and syphilis. Dual test acceptability and operational characteristics were assessed among participants and clinic staff. The prevalence of HIV among the 4,551 enrollees was 3.0% (138/4551) using the national clinic-based HIV testing algorithm. Positive and negative percent agreement of the HIV component of the dual RDT were 100.0% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) respectively, when compared with the national rapid testing algorithm. The prevalence of syphilis, using TPHA as the reference test, was low at 0.09% (4/4550). The sensitivity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT could not be calculated as no positive results were observed for patients that were positive for syphilis by TPHA. Each of the only four TPHA-positive specimens had RPR titers of 1:1 (neat), indicative of non-active syphilis. The specificity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-100.0). The dual RDT received favorable feasibility ratings among antenatal care clinic staff. Acceptability among study participants was high with most women reporting preference for rapid dual HIV/syphilis testing. CONCLUSIONS:The SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test showed a high overall diagnostic accuracy for HIV and a high specificity for syphilis diagnosis in antenatal clinic settings. This study adds to a growing body of evidence that supports the clinic-based use of dual tests for HIV and syphilis among pregnant women.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6038984?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ijaodola Olugbenga
Oyelade Taiwo
Maura Laverty
Evelyn Ngige
Chukwuma Anyaike
Rasheed Bakare
Veronica Ogunleye
Brandy L Peterson Maddox
Daniel R Newman
Harriet D Gliddon
Eugenia Ofondu
Stephen Nurse-Findlay
Melanie M Taylor
spellingShingle Ijaodola Olugbenga
Oyelade Taiwo
Maura Laverty
Evelyn Ngige
Chukwuma Anyaike
Rasheed Bakare
Veronica Ogunleye
Brandy L Peterson Maddox
Daniel R Newman
Harriet D Gliddon
Eugenia Ofondu
Stephen Nurse-Findlay
Melanie M Taylor
Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ijaodola Olugbenga
Oyelade Taiwo
Maura Laverty
Evelyn Ngige
Chukwuma Anyaike
Rasheed Bakare
Veronica Ogunleye
Brandy L Peterson Maddox
Daniel R Newman
Harriet D Gliddon
Eugenia Ofondu
Stephen Nurse-Findlay
Melanie M Taylor
author_sort Ijaodola Olugbenga
title Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.
title_short Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.
title_full Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.
title_fullStr Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.
title_full_unstemmed Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.
title_sort clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of hiv and syphilis in pregnant women in nigeria.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Screening pregnant women for HIV and syphilis is recommended by WHO in order to reduce mother-to-child transmission. We evaluated the field performance, feasibility, and acceptability of a dual rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HIV and syphilis test in antenatal clinic settings in Nigeria. METHODS AND FINDINGS:Participants were recruited at 12 antenatal clinic sites in three states of Nigeria. All consenting individuals were tested according to the national HIV testing algorithm, as well as a dual RDT, the SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test (Alere, USA), in the clinic. To determine sensitivity, specificity and concordance, whole blood samples were obtained for repeat RDT performance in the laboratory, as well as reference tests for HIV and syphilis. Dual test acceptability and operational characteristics were assessed among participants and clinic staff. The prevalence of HIV among the 4,551 enrollees was 3.0% (138/4551) using the national clinic-based HIV testing algorithm. Positive and negative percent agreement of the HIV component of the dual RDT were 100.0% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) respectively, when compared with the national rapid testing algorithm. The prevalence of syphilis, using TPHA as the reference test, was low at 0.09% (4/4550). The sensitivity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT could not be calculated as no positive results were observed for patients that were positive for syphilis by TPHA. Each of the only four TPHA-positive specimens had RPR titers of 1:1 (neat), indicative of non-active syphilis. The specificity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-100.0). The dual RDT received favorable feasibility ratings among antenatal care clinic staff. Acceptability among study participants was high with most women reporting preference for rapid dual HIV/syphilis testing. CONCLUSIONS:The SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test showed a high overall diagnostic accuracy for HIV and a high specificity for syphilis diagnosis in antenatal clinic settings. This study adds to a growing body of evidence that supports the clinic-based use of dual tests for HIV and syphilis among pregnant women.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6038984?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ijaodolaolugbenga clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT oyeladetaiwo clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT mauralaverty clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT evelynngige clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT chukwumaanyaike clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT rasheedbakare clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT veronicaogunleye clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT brandylpetersonmaddox clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT danielrnewman clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT harrietdgliddon clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT eugeniaofondu clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT stephennursefindlay clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
AT melaniemtaylor clinicbasedevaluationstudyofthediagnosticaccuracyofadualrapidtestforthescreeningofhivandsyphilisinpregnantwomeninnigeria
_version_ 1724933993544024064