Respiratory rehabilitation techniques used for the treatment of COPD patients

• Main Authors: PATRASCA Georgeta, POPESCU Gilda, TOFOLEAN Doina Ecaterina, MAIEREAN Anca, DOGARU Gabriela, CHIS Ana, MOTOC Nicoleta Stefania, FILDAN Ariadna Petronela
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Romanian Association of Balneology, Editura Balneara 2020-09-01
• Series: Balneo Research Journal
• Subjects: copd; pulmonary rehabilitation; quality of life (qol)
• Online Access: http://bioclima.ro/Balneo351.pdf

Introduction. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. At present, the pharmacological therapy is not enough for a patient with COPD in regard to heath status and exercise tolerance. It requires additional therapies aimed to improve the quality of life, delay the lung function decline, increase exercise capacity, and reduce the respiratory symptoms and the number of exacerbations. Pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) has been shown to improve respiratory muscle, to optimize functional, psychosocial, behavioral and nutritional status. The aim of the present study was to asses the impact of PRP on COPD patients, focusing on the clinical benefits of PRP, which may further provide to the patients a good support for change. Material and method. Sixty-seven patients with clinically stable COPD were enrolled in this prospective study, consisting in a 6-weeks of PRP. There were recorded demographic data, smoking and medical history, and abnormal findings at the physical examination. All patients completed CAT (COPD Assessment Test) questionnaire and dyspnea on Borg scale, they performed spirometry, and six minutes walking test (6MWT), before and after the completion of the rehabilitation program. Results and Discussions. After the 6-week period of PRP, a large proportion of patients presented higher values of spirometric parameters, although the change was no statistically significant. The impact of COPD on the patient’s health was significantly improved, 58.2% of patients registered < 10 points of CAT questionnaire after PRP (p<0.05). 75% of patients reported a 0-5 points of dyspnea on Borg scale comparing with 29% before the PRP (p=0.0147), and 56% a 0-5 points of fatigue while only 25% of patients had the same score before the rehabilitation programme (p=0,022). Only 8 patients (11.94% vs 31.34%, p<0.05) reported a SaO2 lower than 90% after the PRP. The 6MWD was longer than 250m at the end of the 6-weeks of PRP for 38 patients (56.7% vs 22.38%, p<0.05). Conclusions. The present study showed that a PRP added to pharmacological treatment had a beneficial role of increasing the patient’ health status and exercise tolerance for COPD patients.