Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners

This study aimed to explore the relationship between Turkish English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ self-efficacy level and their use of compensatory strategies (CSs). The study further searched into the most and the least frequently used CSs by Turkish EFL learners. The participant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aynur Kesen Mutlu, Mehdi Solhi Andarab, Cemil Gokhan Karacan*
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: RU Publications 2019-01-01
Series:European Journal of Educational Research
Subjects:
Online Access: http://eu-jer.com/EU-JER_8_1_249.pdf
id doaj-ad143b92fb024f25b7ec375a3ae23125
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad143b92fb024f25b7ec375a3ae231252020-11-24T23:07:40ZengRU PublicationsEuropean Journal of Educational Research 2165-87142165-87142019-01-018124925510.12973/eu-jer.8.1.24912530Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL LearnersAynur Kesen Mutlu0Mehdi Solhi Andarab1Cemil Gokhan Karacan*2 Istanbul Medipol University Istanbul Medipol University Istanbul Medipol University This study aimed to explore the relationship between Turkish English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ self-efficacy level and their use of compensatory strategies (CSs). The study further searched into the most and the least frequently used CSs by Turkish EFL learners. The participants of the study were fifty university students enrolled in the department of English Language Teaching at a private university in Istanbul, Turkey.  Results indicated that the level of self-efficacy among Turkish learners of EFL was high. The top two most frequently used CSs by the learners were concluded to be the use of non-verbal signals (i.e., mime, gesture, facial expression) and circumlocution (i.e., describing an object or idea with a definition). In addition, the two least frequently used strategies were word coinage (i.e., creating a non-existent second language word based on a supposed rule) and avoidance (i.e., avoiding a topic, concept, grammatical construction, or phonological element that poses difficulty). The findings also revealed that the participants’ strategy use was not related to their degree of self-confidence. http://eu-jer.com/EU-JER_8_1_249.pdf Compensatory strategies self-efficacy EFL learners
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aynur Kesen Mutlu
Mehdi Solhi Andarab
Cemil Gokhan Karacan*
spellingShingle Aynur Kesen Mutlu
Mehdi Solhi Andarab
Cemil Gokhan Karacan*
Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners
European Journal of Educational Research
Compensatory strategies
self-efficacy
EFL learners
author_facet Aynur Kesen Mutlu
Mehdi Solhi Andarab
Cemil Gokhan Karacan*
author_sort Aynur Kesen Mutlu
title Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners
title_short Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners
title_full Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners
title_fullStr Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners
title_full_unstemmed Self-Efficacy and the Use of Compensatory Strategies: A Study on EFL Learners
title_sort self-efficacy and the use of compensatory strategies: a study on efl learners
publisher RU Publications
series European Journal of Educational Research
issn 2165-8714
2165-8714
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This study aimed to explore the relationship between Turkish English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ self-efficacy level and their use of compensatory strategies (CSs). The study further searched into the most and the least frequently used CSs by Turkish EFL learners. The participants of the study were fifty university students enrolled in the department of English Language Teaching at a private university in Istanbul, Turkey.  Results indicated that the level of self-efficacy among Turkish learners of EFL was high. The top two most frequently used CSs by the learners were concluded to be the use of non-verbal signals (i.e., mime, gesture, facial expression) and circumlocution (i.e., describing an object or idea with a definition). In addition, the two least frequently used strategies were word coinage (i.e., creating a non-existent second language word based on a supposed rule) and avoidance (i.e., avoiding a topic, concept, grammatical construction, or phonological element that poses difficulty). The findings also revealed that the participants’ strategy use was not related to their degree of self-confidence.
topic Compensatory strategies
self-efficacy
EFL learners
url http://eu-jer.com/EU-JER_8_1_249.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aynurkesenmutlu selfefficacyandtheuseofcompensatorystrategiesastudyonefllearners
AT mehdisolhiandarab selfefficacyandtheuseofcompensatorystrategiesastudyonefllearners
AT cemilgokhankaracan selfefficacyandtheuseofcompensatorystrategiesastudyonefllearners
_version_ 1725617743879733248