<b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>

As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight bodyposition more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar”elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Ferreirinha, António Silva, António Teixeira Marques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2008-12-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/386
id doaj-ad03246d904b4707b92809e391ca6b43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad03246d904b4707b92809e391ca6b432020-11-24T23:35:24ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaRevista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano1415-84261980-00372008-12-01104386392<b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>José FerreirinhaAntónio SilvaAntónio Teixeira MarquesAs a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight bodyposition more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar”elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate twoobservation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 unevenbars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principalresults we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations,as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. Wemay conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted thetrends towards increased use of straight body positions.http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/386Women’s artistic gymnasticsUneven barsBody positionTrendsGinástica artística femininaParalelas assimétricasPosição do corpoTendências.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José Ferreirinha
António Silva
António Teixeira Marques
spellingShingle José Ferreirinha
António Silva
António Teixeira Marques
<b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
Women’s artistic gymnastics
Uneven bars
Body position
Trends
Ginástica artística feminina
Paralelas assimétricas
Posição do corpo
Tendências.
author_facet José Ferreirinha
António Silva
António Teixeira Marques
author_sort José Ferreirinha
title <b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>
title_short <b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>
title_full <b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>
title_fullStr <b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>
title_full_unstemmed <b> Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines – Influence of “in bar ” elements </b>
title_sort <b> evolution of body position in uneven bars routines – influence of “in bar ” elements </b>
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
issn 1415-8426
1980-0037
publishDate 2008-12-01
description As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight bodyposition more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar”elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate twoobservation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 unevenbars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principalresults we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations,as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. Wemay conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted thetrends towards increased use of straight body positions.
topic Women’s artistic gymnastics
Uneven bars
Body position
Trends
Ginástica artística feminina
Paralelas assimétricas
Posição do corpo
Tendências.
url http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/386
work_keys_str_mv AT joseferreirinha bevolutionofbodypositioninunevenbarsroutinesinfluenceofinbarelementsb
AT antoniosilva bevolutionofbodypositioninunevenbarsroutinesinfluenceofinbarelementsb
AT antonioteixeiramarques bevolutionofbodypositioninunevenbarsroutinesinfluenceofinbarelementsb
_version_ 1725526308124884992