On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical
What “physical” means is sometimes clarified by appealing to paradigmatically physical objects, properties, or phenomena. This move is not entirely unmotivated. The most basic intuition behind physicalism can be identified as that we, as conscious beings, are not ontologically special: we are, ulti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Problemos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/18045 |
id |
doaj-ad01402550a64d23bfe7daaebae09a95 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ad01402550a64d23bfe7daaebae09a952021-04-23T09:24:38ZengVilnius University PressProblemos1392-11262424-61582021-04-019910.15388/Problemos.99.6On the Paradigmatic Conception of the PhysicalTufan Kıymaz0Bilkent University, Turkey What “physical” means is sometimes clarified by appealing to paradigmatically physical objects, properties, or phenomena. This move is not entirely unmotivated. The most basic intuition behind physicalism can be identified as that we, as conscious beings, are not ontologically special: we are, ultimately, like all these inanimate and unconscious things; we do not exemplify any mysterious properties that are categorically over and above all the properties that are exemplified by ordinary things like chairs or rocks or their constituents. And, according to the dualists, we are, in terms of substance or property, metaphysically different from chairs, rocks, and the like. The kind of conception of the physical that refers to paradigm cases of the physical is in line with this disagreement in intuition between the physicalist and the dualist. Trying to conceptualize the physical based on some paradigmatically physical objects or phenomena, I argue, however, is a dead-end. https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/18045PhysicalityPhysicalism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tufan Kıymaz |
spellingShingle |
Tufan Kıymaz On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical Problemos Physicality Physicalism |
author_facet |
Tufan Kıymaz |
author_sort |
Tufan Kıymaz |
title |
On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical |
title_short |
On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical |
title_full |
On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical |
title_fullStr |
On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical |
title_sort |
on the paradigmatic conception of the physical |
publisher |
Vilnius University Press |
series |
Problemos |
issn |
1392-1126 2424-6158 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
What “physical” means is sometimes clarified by appealing to paradigmatically physical objects, properties, or phenomena. This move is not entirely unmotivated. The most basic intuition behind physicalism can be identified as that we, as conscious beings, are not ontologically special: we are, ultimately, like all these inanimate and unconscious things; we do not exemplify any mysterious properties that are categorically over and above all the properties that are exemplified by ordinary things like chairs or rocks or their constituents. And, according to the dualists, we are, in terms of substance or property, metaphysically different from chairs, rocks, and the like. The kind of conception of the physical that refers to paradigm cases of the physical is in line with this disagreement in intuition between the physicalist and the dualist. Trying to conceptualize the physical based on some paradigmatically physical objects or phenomena, I argue, however, is a dead-end.
|
topic |
Physicality Physicalism |
url |
https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/18045 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tufankıymaz ontheparadigmaticconceptionofthephysical |
_version_ |
1721512802624995328 |