On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical

What “physical” means is sometimes clarified by appealing to paradigmatically physical objects, properties, or phenomena. This move is not entirely unmotivated. The most basic intuition behind physicalism can be identified as that we, as conscious beings, are not ontologically special: we are, ulti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tufan Kıymaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2021-04-01
Series:Problemos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/18045
id doaj-ad01402550a64d23bfe7daaebae09a95
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad01402550a64d23bfe7daaebae09a952021-04-23T09:24:38ZengVilnius University PressProblemos1392-11262424-61582021-04-019910.15388/Problemos.99.6On the Paradigmatic Conception of the PhysicalTufan Kıymaz0Bilkent University, Turkey What “physical” means is sometimes clarified by appealing to paradigmatically physical objects, properties, or phenomena. This move is not entirely unmotivated. The most basic intuition behind physicalism can be identified as that we, as conscious beings, are not ontologically special: we are, ultimately, like all these inanimate and unconscious things; we do not exemplify any mysterious properties that are categorically over and above all the properties that are exemplified by ordinary things like chairs or rocks or their constituents. And, according to the dualists, we are, in terms of substance or property, metaphysically different from chairs, rocks, and the like. The kind of conception of the physical that refers to paradigm cases of the physical is in line with this disagreement in intuition between the physicalist and the dualist. Trying to conceptualize the physical based on some paradigmatically physical objects or phenomena, I argue, however, is a dead-end. https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/18045PhysicalityPhysicalism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tufan Kıymaz
spellingShingle Tufan Kıymaz
On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical
Problemos
Physicality
Physicalism
author_facet Tufan Kıymaz
author_sort Tufan Kıymaz
title On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical
title_short On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical
title_full On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical
title_fullStr On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical
title_full_unstemmed On the Paradigmatic Conception of the Physical
title_sort on the paradigmatic conception of the physical
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Problemos
issn 1392-1126
2424-6158
publishDate 2021-04-01
description What “physical” means is sometimes clarified by appealing to paradigmatically physical objects, properties, or phenomena. This move is not entirely unmotivated. The most basic intuition behind physicalism can be identified as that we, as conscious beings, are not ontologically special: we are, ultimately, like all these inanimate and unconscious things; we do not exemplify any mysterious properties that are categorically over and above all the properties that are exemplified by ordinary things like chairs or rocks or their constituents. And, according to the dualists, we are, in terms of substance or property, metaphysically different from chairs, rocks, and the like. The kind of conception of the physical that refers to paradigm cases of the physical is in line with this disagreement in intuition between the physicalist and the dualist. Trying to conceptualize the physical based on some paradigmatically physical objects or phenomena, I argue, however, is a dead-end.
topic Physicality
Physicalism
url https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/18045
work_keys_str_mv AT tufankıymaz ontheparadigmaticconceptionofthephysical
_version_ 1721512802624995328