Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand

Background: The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) was developed to enhance chemical classification and hazard communication systems worldwide. However, some of the elements such as building blocks and data sources have the potential to cause “disharmony” to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Fadhil H.A. Yazid, Goh Choo Ta, Mazlin Mokhtar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-06-01
Series:Safety and Health at Work
Subjects:
GHS
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791119307292
id doaj-acfb2280265245f78a8f8bdf9c0dd6c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-acfb2280265245f78a8f8bdf9c0dd6c82020-11-25T02:24:20ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112020-06-01112152158Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New ZealandMohd Fadhil H.A. Yazid0Goh Choo Ta1Mazlin Mokhtar2Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Selangor, Malaysia; Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), Ministry of Human Resources (MOHR), MalaysiaInstitute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Selangor, Malaysia; Corresponding author. Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), UKM BANGI, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Selangor, MalaysiaBackground: The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) was developed to enhance chemical classification and hazard communication systems worldwide. However, some of the elements such as building blocks and data sources have the potential to cause “disharmony” to the GHS, particularly in its classification results. It is known that some countries have developed their own lists of classified chemicals in accordance with the GHS to “standardize” the classification results within their respective countries. However, the lists of classified chemicals may not be consistent among these countries. Method: In this study, the lists of classified chemicals developed by the European Union, Japan, Malaysia, and New Zealand were selected for comparison of classification results for carcinogenicity, germ cell mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity. Results: The findings show that only 54%, 66%, and 37% of the classification results for each Carcinogen, Mutagen and Reproductive toxicants hazard classes, respectively are the same among the selected countries. This indicates a “moderate” level of consistency among the classified chemicals lists. Conclusion: By using classification results for the carcinogenicity, germ cell mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity hazard classes, this study demonstrates the “disharmony” in the classification results among the selected countries. We believe that the findings of this study deserve the attention of the relevant international bodies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791119307292Chemical classification and labellingChemical classification listChemical safetyGHSHazard communication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohd Fadhil H.A. Yazid
Goh Choo Ta
Mazlin Mokhtar
spellingShingle Mohd Fadhil H.A. Yazid
Goh Choo Ta
Mazlin Mokhtar
Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand
Safety and Health at Work
Chemical classification and labelling
Chemical classification list
Chemical safety
GHS
Hazard communication
author_facet Mohd Fadhil H.A. Yazid
Goh Choo Ta
Mazlin Mokhtar
author_sort Mohd Fadhil H.A. Yazid
title Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand
title_short Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand
title_full Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand
title_fullStr Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand
title_sort classified chemicals in accordance with the globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals: comparison of lists of the european union, japan, malaysia and new zealand
publisher Elsevier
series Safety and Health at Work
issn 2093-7911
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background: The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) was developed to enhance chemical classification and hazard communication systems worldwide. However, some of the elements such as building blocks and data sources have the potential to cause “disharmony” to the GHS, particularly in its classification results. It is known that some countries have developed their own lists of classified chemicals in accordance with the GHS to “standardize” the classification results within their respective countries. However, the lists of classified chemicals may not be consistent among these countries. Method: In this study, the lists of classified chemicals developed by the European Union, Japan, Malaysia, and New Zealand were selected for comparison of classification results for carcinogenicity, germ cell mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity. Results: The findings show that only 54%, 66%, and 37% of the classification results for each Carcinogen, Mutagen and Reproductive toxicants hazard classes, respectively are the same among the selected countries. This indicates a “moderate” level of consistency among the classified chemicals lists. Conclusion: By using classification results for the carcinogenicity, germ cell mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity hazard classes, this study demonstrates the “disharmony” in the classification results among the selected countries. We believe that the findings of this study deserve the attention of the relevant international bodies.
topic Chemical classification and labelling
Chemical classification list
Chemical safety
GHS
Hazard communication
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791119307292
work_keys_str_mv AT mohdfadhilhayazid classifiedchemicalsinaccordancewiththegloballyharmonizedsystemofclassificationandlabelingofchemicalscomparisonoflistsoftheeuropeanunionjapanmalaysiaandnewzealand
AT gohchoota classifiedchemicalsinaccordancewiththegloballyharmonizedsystemofclassificationandlabelingofchemicalscomparisonoflistsoftheeuropeanunionjapanmalaysiaandnewzealand
AT mazlinmokhtar classifiedchemicalsinaccordancewiththegloballyharmonizedsystemofclassificationandlabelingofchemicalscomparisonoflistsoftheeuropeanunionjapanmalaysiaandnewzealand
_version_ 1724856235249893376