Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi

In this article, I argue that fregean approach to semantics, like that of modelling semantics, doesn’t have the conceptual tools to define the notions of truth and reference. The reason is that these programs ignore what Wittgenstein taught us, namely the link between meaning and use. More specifica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giovanni Raimo
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2018-07-01
Series:Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/Lebenswelt/article/view/10363
id doaj-acf99d4c405a46efab30c6564438fdb8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-acf99d4c405a46efab30c6564438fdb82020-11-24T22:27:36ZdeuUniversità degli Studi di MilanoLebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience2240-95992018-07-0101210.13130/2240-9599/103638854Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggiGiovanni RaimoIn this article, I argue that fregean approach to semantics, like that of modelling semantics, doesn’t have the conceptual tools to define the notions of truth and reference. The reason is that these programs ignore what Wittgenstein taught us, namely the link between meaning and use. More specifically, I intend to show how a theory of descriptive language can only be constructed by clarifying the connection between the notions of linguistic game, meaning and description. But how can this connection be clarified? Wittgenstein, in the second phase of his thought, had never been interested in a theory of this type (ie the construction of a theory of descriptive use), and all his reflections on use and meaning had the sole purpose of “curing” from that essentialist attitude (the claim to capture the "essence" of the terms) that had characterized the Tractatus, and which still today characterizes almost the whole analytic philosophy. This means that it is not in Wittgenstein's thought that we can find such a theory, but in Moritz Schlick’s works, who attempted to build a theory of linguistic meaning based on the connection between the notions of image, use and verification.https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/Lebenswelt/article/view/10363
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giovanni Raimo
spellingShingle Giovanni Raimo
Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi
Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience
author_facet Giovanni Raimo
author_sort Giovanni Raimo
title Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi
title_short Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi
title_full Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi
title_fullStr Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi
title_full_unstemmed Ritornare a Schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi
title_sort ritornare a schlick: semantica modellistica e uso descrittivo del linguaggi
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience
issn 2240-9599
publishDate 2018-07-01
description In this article, I argue that fregean approach to semantics, like that of modelling semantics, doesn’t have the conceptual tools to define the notions of truth and reference. The reason is that these programs ignore what Wittgenstein taught us, namely the link between meaning and use. More specifically, I intend to show how a theory of descriptive language can only be constructed by clarifying the connection between the notions of linguistic game, meaning and description. But how can this connection be clarified? Wittgenstein, in the second phase of his thought, had never been interested in a theory of this type (ie the construction of a theory of descriptive use), and all his reflections on use and meaning had the sole purpose of “curing” from that essentialist attitude (the claim to capture the "essence" of the terms) that had characterized the Tractatus, and which still today characterizes almost the whole analytic philosophy. This means that it is not in Wittgenstein's thought that we can find such a theory, but in Moritz Schlick’s works, who attempted to build a theory of linguistic meaning based on the connection between the notions of image, use and verification.
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/Lebenswelt/article/view/10363
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniraimo ritornareaschlicksemanticamodellisticaeusodescrittivodellinguaggi
_version_ 1725749291694161920