Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
Risk attitudes implied by valuations of risk-increasing assets depart markedly from those implied by valuations of risk-reducing assets. For instance, many are unwilling to pay the expected value for a risky asset or for its perfect hedge. Although nearly every theory of risk preference (and logic)...
Main Authors: | Shane Frederick, Amanda Levis, Steven Malliaris, Andrew Meyer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18514r/jdm18514r.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Valuing bets and
hedges
by: Subimal Chatterjee, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
High-stakes hedges
are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications
for the construct of risk preference”
by: Philip W. S. Newall, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Hedging on Betting Markets
by: Gustav Axén, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Home bias in sport
betting: Evidence from Czech betting market
by: Rostislav Staněk
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Adaptation to DNA damage as a bet-hedging mechanism in a fluctuating environment
by: Pierre Roux, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)