Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight Countries
By using machine learning technique, this article presents sentiment and concept analyses on 48,043 articles published in The Economist from 1991 through 2016. The Economist is one of the world’s most influential political and economic magazines. The article analyzes and compares the magazine’s sent...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-08-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020951268 |
id |
doaj-acc84ae08cb94a338d3a17e69e5d06b1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-acc84ae08cb94a338d3a17e69e5d06b12020-11-25T03:42:24ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402020-08-011010.1177/2158244020951268Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight CountriesShesen Guo0Ganzhou Zhang1Hangzhou Normal University, ChinaHangzhou Normal University, ChinaBy using machine learning technique, this article presents sentiment and concept analyses on 48,043 articles published in The Economist from 1991 through 2016. The Economist is one of the world’s most influential political and economic magazines. The article analyzes and compares the magazine’s sentiment orientations toward the Group of Seven’s ingroup member countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and its outgroup member country China. The sentiment analyses are performed on and compared between different periods of Clinton’s, Bush’s, and Obama’s administrations in the United States; Major’s, Blair’s, Brown’s, and Cameron’s cabinets in the United Kingdom; and Kohl’s, Schröder’s, and Merkel’s in Germany. The relationship between China hosting the Olympic Games or its growing economic power and the magazine’s sentiment orientations toward the country is examined. The concept analysis on the articles with extreme positivity or negativity shows that there is no difference between the ingroup and outgroup members in the topics covered in The Economist.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020951268 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shesen Guo Ganzhou Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Shesen Guo Ganzhou Zhang Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight Countries SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Shesen Guo Ganzhou Zhang |
author_sort |
Shesen Guo |
title |
Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight Countries |
title_short |
Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight Countries |
title_full |
Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight Countries |
title_fullStr |
Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight Countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using Machine Learning for Analyzing Sentiment Orientations Toward Eight Countries |
title_sort |
using machine learning for analyzing sentiment orientations toward eight countries |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
By using machine learning technique, this article presents sentiment and concept analyses on 48,043 articles published in The Economist from 1991 through 2016. The Economist is one of the world’s most influential political and economic magazines. The article analyzes and compares the magazine’s sentiment orientations toward the Group of Seven’s ingroup member countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and its outgroup member country China. The sentiment analyses are performed on and compared between different periods of Clinton’s, Bush’s, and Obama’s administrations in the United States; Major’s, Blair’s, Brown’s, and Cameron’s cabinets in the United Kingdom; and Kohl’s, Schröder’s, and Merkel’s in Germany. The relationship between China hosting the Olympic Games or its growing economic power and the magazine’s sentiment orientations toward the country is examined. The concept analysis on the articles with extreme positivity or negativity shows that there is no difference between the ingroup and outgroup members in the topics covered in The Economist. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020951268 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shesenguo usingmachinelearningforanalyzingsentimentorientationstowardeightcountries AT ganzhouzhang usingmachinelearningforanalyzingsentimentorientationstowardeightcountries |
_version_ |
1724525260335742976 |