Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options
The prominence of Romans 1:18-32 in the gay-debate is the subject of various and wide-ranging opinions as far as the most adequate interpretation of this passage. This contribution puts the debate about the text into perspective by surveying some recent alternative opinions on its meaning. It is est...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Afrikaans |
| Published: |
AOSIS
2007-05-01
|
| Series: | HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies |
| Online Access: | https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/238 |
| id |
doaj-acc3009f884941879ddad883ba2d295f |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-acc3009f884941879ddad883ba2d295f2020-11-24T22:36:29ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502007-05-0163396598210.4102/hts.v63i3.238155Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative optionsJeremy Punt0University of StellenboschThe prominence of Romans 1:18-32 in the gay-debate is the subject of various and wide-ranging opinions as far as the most adequate interpretation of this passage. This contribution puts the debate about the text into perspective by surveying some recent alternative opinions on its meaning. It is established that two particular matters are most important in Romans 1:18-32 and the past and current debate on its interpretation: the argument according to “nature” and the nature of the infringement or error (Rm 1:27).https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/238 |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
Afrikaans |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Jeremy Punt |
| spellingShingle |
Jeremy Punt Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies |
| author_facet |
Jeremy Punt |
| author_sort |
Jeremy Punt |
| title |
Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options |
| title_short |
Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options |
| title_full |
Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options |
| title_fullStr |
Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options |
| title_sort |
romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: interpretative options |
| publisher |
AOSIS |
| series |
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies |
| issn |
0259-9422 2072-8050 |
| publishDate |
2007-05-01 |
| description |
The prominence of Romans 1:18-32 in the gay-debate is the subject of various and wide-ranging opinions as far as the most adequate interpretation of this passage. This contribution puts the debate about the text into perspective by surveying some recent alternative opinions on its meaning. It is established that two particular matters are most important in Romans 1:18-32 and the past and current debate on its interpretation: the argument according to “nature” and the nature of the infringement or error (Rm 1:27). |
| url |
https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/238 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeremypunt romans11832amidstthegaydebateinterpretativeoptions |
| _version_ |
1725720031315099648 |