What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies

Objectives Double checking is used in oncology to detect medication errors before administering chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of detected potential medication errors, i.e., mismatching information, and to better understand the nature of these inconsistenci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yvonne Pfeiffer, Chantal Zimmermann, David L. B. Schwappach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e039291.full
id doaj-acbe3ccd2770494e966c18fe287aaa55
record_format Article
spelling doaj-acbe3ccd2770494e966c18fe287aaa552021-07-21T16:05:52ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2020-039291What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistenciesYvonne Pfeiffer0Chantal Zimmermann1David L. B. Schwappach2Swiss Patient Safety Foundation, Asylstr, Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Zurich, SwitzerlandSwiss Patient Safety Foundation, Asylstr, Zurich, SwitzerlandObjectives Double checking is used in oncology to detect medication errors before administering chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of detected potential medication errors, i.e., mismatching information, and to better understand the nature of these inconsistencies.Design In observing checking procedures, field noteswere taken of all inconsistencies that nurses identified during double checking the order against the prepared chemotherapy.Setting Oncological wards and ambulatory infusion centres of three Swiss hospitals.Participants Nurses’ double checking was observed.Outcome measures In a qualitative analysis, (1) a category system for the inconsistencies was developed and (2) independently applied by two researchers.Results In 22 (3.2%) of 690 observed double checks, 28 chemotherapy-related inconsistencies were detected. Half of them related to non-matching information between order and drug label, while the other half was identified because the nurses used their own knowledge. 75% of the inconsistencies could be traced back to inappropriate orders, and the inconsistencies led to 33 subsequent or corrective actions.Conclusions In double check situations, the plausibility of the medication is often reviewed. Additionally, they serve as a correction for errors and that are made much earlier in the medication process, during order. Both results open up new opportunities for improving the medication process.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e039291.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yvonne Pfeiffer
Chantal Zimmermann
David L. B. Schwappach
spellingShingle Yvonne Pfeiffer
Chantal Zimmermann
David L. B. Schwappach
What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
BMJ Open
author_facet Yvonne Pfeiffer
Chantal Zimmermann
David L. B. Schwappach
author_sort Yvonne Pfeiffer
title What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
title_short What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
title_full What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
title_fullStr What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
title_full_unstemmed What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
title_sort what do double-check routines actually detect? an observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Objectives Double checking is used in oncology to detect medication errors before administering chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of detected potential medication errors, i.e., mismatching information, and to better understand the nature of these inconsistencies.Design In observing checking procedures, field noteswere taken of all inconsistencies that nurses identified during double checking the order against the prepared chemotherapy.Setting Oncological wards and ambulatory infusion centres of three Swiss hospitals.Participants Nurses’ double checking was observed.Outcome measures In a qualitative analysis, (1) a category system for the inconsistencies was developed and (2) independently applied by two researchers.Results In 22 (3.2%) of 690 observed double checks, 28 chemotherapy-related inconsistencies were detected. Half of them related to non-matching information between order and drug label, while the other half was identified because the nurses used their own knowledge. 75% of the inconsistencies could be traced back to inappropriate orders, and the inconsistencies led to 33 subsequent or corrective actions.Conclusions In double check situations, the plausibility of the medication is often reviewed. Additionally, they serve as a correction for errors and that are made much earlier in the medication process, during order. Both results open up new opportunities for improving the medication process.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e039291.full
work_keys_str_mv AT yvonnepfeiffer whatdodoublecheckroutinesactuallydetectanobservationalassessmentandqualitativeanalysisofidentifiedinconsistencies
AT chantalzimmermann whatdodoublecheckroutinesactuallydetectanobservationalassessmentandqualitativeanalysisofidentifiedinconsistencies
AT davidlbschwappach whatdodoublecheckroutinesactuallydetectanobservationalassessmentandqualitativeanalysisofidentifiedinconsistencies
_version_ 1721292545716125696