Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare
This article brings to the forefront the process concerning evaluating planning, plans and the corresponding criteria in relation to the concept of evidence-based planning (as presented by authors in spatial planning like Simin Davoudi and Andreas Faludi). The subject revolves around two key questio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
NR&DI URBAN-INCERC
2012-03-01
|
Series: | Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v3n1a02.pdf |
id |
doaj-acb3221b348641e5a429fe5ac683eee3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-acb3221b348641e5a429fe5ac683eee32021-05-02T09:05:17ZengNR&DI URBAN-INCERCUrbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii2069-05092069-64692012-03-01312732Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificareAndrei Ştefan SăbăuThis article brings to the forefront the process concerning evaluating planning, plans and the corresponding criteria in relation to the concept of evidence-based planning (as presented by authors in spatial planning like Simin Davoudi and Andreas Faludi). The subject revolves around two key questions: “Which is the most important aspect to take into account regarding planning at large?” and „ To what extent “evidence” (as discussed by the two authors) always are value-free and unbiased facts regardless of how they are interpreted”. It concludes with the assumption that without strong evidences the evaluation process is almost null, but in the same time, a well-made evaluation of a plan can pose as an evidence for accepting or rejecting a plan.http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v3n1a02.pdfevaluating planningevidence-based planningevaluation criteria |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrei Ştefan Săbău |
spellingShingle |
Andrei Ştefan Săbău Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii evaluating planning evidence-based planning evaluation criteria |
author_facet |
Andrei Ştefan Săbău |
author_sort |
Andrei Ştefan Săbău |
title |
Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare |
title_short |
Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare |
title_full |
Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare |
title_fullStr |
Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare |
title_sort |
evaluarea în planificarea urbană, a planurilor urbanistice şi procesele de planificare |
publisher |
NR&DI URBAN-INCERC |
series |
Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii |
issn |
2069-0509 2069-6469 |
publishDate |
2012-03-01 |
description |
This article brings to the forefront the process concerning evaluating planning, plans and the corresponding criteria in relation to the concept of evidence-based planning (as presented by authors in spatial planning like Simin Davoudi and Andreas Faludi). The subject revolves around two key questions: “Which is the most important aspect to take into account regarding planning at large?” and „ To what extent “evidence” (as discussed by the two authors) always are value-free and unbiased facts regardless of how they are interpreted”. It concludes with the assumption that without strong evidences the evaluation process is almost null, but in the same time, a well-made evaluation of a plan can pose as an evidence for accepting or rejecting a plan. |
topic |
evaluating planning evidence-based planning evaluation criteria |
url |
http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v3n1a02.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreistefansabau evaluareainplanificareaurbanaaplanurilorurbanisticesiproceseledeplanificare |
_version_ |
1721493490364317696 |