PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009

PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009

Show other versions (1)

Gender activists have two opposite point of view towards the decision from Constitutional Court of Justice (MK). The one who does not agree with the decision argue that the decision can rise many obstacles for women who want to be members of parliament. The women argue that women - compared to men -...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tri Lisiani Prihatinah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jenderal Soedirman University 2010-05-01
Series:Journal of Dinamika Hukum
Online Access:http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/148
id doaj-ac98f76a40ea4d3bb38e227e27bc6dab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac98f76a40ea4d3bb38e227e27bc6dab2020-11-25T02:11:35ZengJenderal Soedirman UniversityJournal of Dinamika Hukum1410-07972407-65622010-05-0110210.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.2.148137PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009Tri Lisiani PrihatinahGender activists have two opposite point of view towards the decision from Constitutional Court of Justice (MK). The one who does not agree with the decision argue that the decision can rise many obstacles for women who want to be members of parliament. The women argue that women - compared to men - have more burdens either in private and public life, therefore they have more difficulties to become members of parliament. On the other hand, some gender activists mention that this decision gives a good opportunity for women to show that they are elected into the parliament because of their qualified capabilities with no preference from gender point of view. Besides, in the general election under MK containing a fair competition for both women and men, reflects that people sovereignty is more accommodated, although a substantive gender equality is marginalized. Keywords: gender perspective, the Constitutional Court, affirmative policieshttp://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/148
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tri Lisiani Prihatinah
spellingShingle Tri Lisiani Prihatinah
PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009
Journal of Dinamika Hukum
author_facet Tri Lisiani Prihatinah
author_sort Tri Lisiani Prihatinah
title PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009
title_short PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009
title_full PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009
title_fullStr PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009
title_full_unstemmed PERSPEKTIF JENDER TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG DIHAPUSKANNYA KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2009
title_sort perspektif jender terhadap putusan mahkamah konstitusi tentang dihapuskannya kebijakan afirmatif perempuan di parlemen pada pemilu tahun 2009
publisher Jenderal Soedirman University
series Journal of Dinamika Hukum
issn 1410-0797
2407-6562
publishDate 2010-05-01
description Gender activists have two opposite point of view towards the decision from Constitutional Court of Justice (MK). The one who does not agree with the decision argue that the decision can rise many obstacles for women who want to be members of parliament. The women argue that women - compared to men - have more burdens either in private and public life, therefore they have more difficulties to become members of parliament. On the other hand, some gender activists mention that this decision gives a good opportunity for women to show that they are elected into the parliament because of their qualified capabilities with no preference from gender point of view. Besides, in the general election under MK containing a fair competition for both women and men, reflects that people sovereignty is more accommodated, although a substantive gender equality is marginalized. Keywords: gender perspective, the Constitutional Court, affirmative policies
url http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/148
work_keys_str_mv AT trilisianiprihatinah perspektifjenderterhadapputusanmahkamahkonstitusitentangdihapuskannyakebijakanafirmatifperempuandiparlemenpadapemilutahun2009
_version_ 1724914002071388160

Similar Items