Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a capable technology based on a wide range of parameters. The goal of this study is to make a comparison between infill pattern and infill density generated by computer-aided design (CAD) and FDM. Grid, triangle, zigzag, and concentric patterns with various densiti...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/16/7272 |
id |
doaj-ac9882fdcca54ce1868d72d5f0f09158 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ac9882fdcca54ce1868d72d5f0f091582021-08-26T13:29:23ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-08-01117272727210.3390/app11167272Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength PropertiesMohammadreza Lalegani Dezaki0Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd Ariffin1Ahmad Serjouei2Ali Zolfagharian3Saghi Hatami4Mahdi Bodaghi5Advance Manufacturing Research Group, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, MalaysiaAdvance Manufacturing Research Group, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, MalaysiaDepartment of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UKSchool of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong 3216, AustraliaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Applied Science and Technology, Tehran 1599665111, IranDepartment of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UKFused deposition modeling (FDM) is a capable technology based on a wide range of parameters. The goal of this study is to make a comparison between infill pattern and infill density generated by computer-aided design (CAD) and FDM. Grid, triangle, zigzag, and concentric patterns with various densities following the same structure of the FDM machine were designed by CAD software (CATIA V5<sup>®</sup>). Polylactic acid (PLA) material was assigned for both procedures. Surface roughness (SR) and tensile strength analysis were conducted to examine their effects on dog-bone samples. Also, a finite element analysis (FEA) was done on CAD specimens to find out the differences between printing and simulation processes. Results illustrated that CAD specimens had a better surface texture compared to the FDM machine while tensile tests showed patterns generated by FDM were stronger in terms of strength and stiffness. In this study, samples with concentric patterns had the lowest average SR (Ra) while zigzag was the worst with the value of 6.27 µm. Also, the highest strength was obtained for concentric and grid samples in both CAD and FDM procedures. These techniques can be useful in producing highly complex sandwich structures, bone scaffolds, and various combined patterns to achieve an optimal condition.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/16/7272additive manufacturingpolylactic acidfused deposition modelingFDMPLA3D printing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mohammadreza Lalegani Dezaki Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd Ariffin Ahmad Serjouei Ali Zolfagharian Saghi Hatami Mahdi Bodaghi |
spellingShingle |
Mohammadreza Lalegani Dezaki Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd Ariffin Ahmad Serjouei Ali Zolfagharian Saghi Hatami Mahdi Bodaghi Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties Applied Sciences additive manufacturing polylactic acid fused deposition modeling FDM PLA 3D printing |
author_facet |
Mohammadreza Lalegani Dezaki Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd Ariffin Ahmad Serjouei Ali Zolfagharian Saghi Hatami Mahdi Bodaghi |
author_sort |
Mohammadreza Lalegani Dezaki |
title |
Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties |
title_short |
Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties |
title_full |
Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties |
title_fullStr |
Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by CAD and FDM 3D Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties |
title_sort |
influence of infill patterns generated by cad and fdm 3d printer on surface roughness and tensile strength properties |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a capable technology based on a wide range of parameters. The goal of this study is to make a comparison between infill pattern and infill density generated by computer-aided design (CAD) and FDM. Grid, triangle, zigzag, and concentric patterns with various densities following the same structure of the FDM machine were designed by CAD software (CATIA V5<sup>®</sup>). Polylactic acid (PLA) material was assigned for both procedures. Surface roughness (SR) and tensile strength analysis were conducted to examine their effects on dog-bone samples. Also, a finite element analysis (FEA) was done on CAD specimens to find out the differences between printing and simulation processes. Results illustrated that CAD specimens had a better surface texture compared to the FDM machine while tensile tests showed patterns generated by FDM were stronger in terms of strength and stiffness. In this study, samples with concentric patterns had the lowest average SR (Ra) while zigzag was the worst with the value of 6.27 µm. Also, the highest strength was obtained for concentric and grid samples in both CAD and FDM procedures. These techniques can be useful in producing highly complex sandwich structures, bone scaffolds, and various combined patterns to achieve an optimal condition. |
topic |
additive manufacturing polylactic acid fused deposition modeling FDM PLA 3D printing |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/16/7272 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mohammadrezalaleganidezaki influenceofinfillpatternsgeneratedbycadandfdm3dprinteronsurfaceroughnessandtensilestrengthproperties AT mohdkhairolanuarmohdariffin influenceofinfillpatternsgeneratedbycadandfdm3dprinteronsurfaceroughnessandtensilestrengthproperties AT ahmadserjouei influenceofinfillpatternsgeneratedbycadandfdm3dprinteronsurfaceroughnessandtensilestrengthproperties AT alizolfagharian influenceofinfillpatternsgeneratedbycadandfdm3dprinteronsurfaceroughnessandtensilestrengthproperties AT saghihatami influenceofinfillpatternsgeneratedbycadandfdm3dprinteronsurfaceroughnessandtensilestrengthproperties AT mahdibodaghi influenceofinfillpatternsgeneratedbycadandfdm3dprinteronsurfaceroughnessandtensilestrengthproperties |
_version_ |
1714339552180568064 |