Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction

Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed probability cueing. The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harriet eGoschy, Sarolta eBakos, Hermann Josef Mueller, Michael eZehetleitner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195/full
id doaj-ac9116ee3af9402598422e17fceaf28e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac9116ee3af9402598422e17fceaf28e2020-11-24T22:21:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-11-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0119587030Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reductionHarriet eGoschy0Harriet eGoschy1Sarolta eBakos2Hermann Josef Mueller3Hermann Josef Mueller4Michael eZehetleitner5Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenGraduate School of Systemic NeurosciencesLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenUniversity of LondonLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenTargets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed probability cueing. The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also minimize distraction by distractors in probable distractor regions as compared to distractors in less probable distractor regions. To this end, three visual search experiments with a salient, but task-irrelevant, distractor (additional singleton) were conducted. Experiment 1 demonstrated that observers can utilize uneven spatial distractor distributions to selectively reduce interference by distractors in frequent distractor regions as compared to distractors in rare distractor regions. Experiment 2 and 3 showed that intertrial facilitation, i.e. distractor position repetitions, and statistical learning (independent of distractor position repetitions) both contribute to the probability cueing effect for distractor locations. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that probability cueing of distractor locations has the potential to serve as a strong attentional cue for the shielding of likely distractor locations.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195/fullstatistical learningvisual searchattentional captureprobability cueingintertrial facilitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harriet eGoschy
Harriet eGoschy
Sarolta eBakos
Hermann Josef Mueller
Hermann Josef Mueller
Michael eZehetleitner
spellingShingle Harriet eGoschy
Harriet eGoschy
Sarolta eBakos
Hermann Josef Mueller
Hermann Josef Mueller
Michael eZehetleitner
Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
Frontiers in Psychology
statistical learning
visual search
attentional capture
probability cueing
intertrial facilitation
author_facet Harriet eGoschy
Harriet eGoschy
Sarolta eBakos
Hermann Josef Mueller
Hermann Josef Mueller
Michael eZehetleitner
author_sort Harriet eGoschy
title Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_short Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_full Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_fullStr Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_full_unstemmed Probability cueing of distractor locations:Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
title_sort probability cueing of distractor locations:both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear in a probable target region as compared to a less probable target region, an effect which has been termed probability cueing. The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up target detection, but also minimize distraction by distractors in probable distractor regions as compared to distractors in less probable distractor regions. To this end, three visual search experiments with a salient, but task-irrelevant, distractor (additional singleton) were conducted. Experiment 1 demonstrated that observers can utilize uneven spatial distractor distributions to selectively reduce interference by distractors in frequent distractor regions as compared to distractors in rare distractor regions. Experiment 2 and 3 showed that intertrial facilitation, i.e. distractor position repetitions, and statistical learning (independent of distractor position repetitions) both contribute to the probability cueing effect for distractor locations. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that probability cueing of distractor locations has the potential to serve as a strong attentional cue for the shielding of likely distractor locations.
topic statistical learning
visual search
attentional capture
probability cueing
intertrial facilitation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195/full
work_keys_str_mv AT harrietegoschy probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT harrietegoschy probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT saroltaebakos probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT hermannjosefmueller probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT hermannjosefmueller probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
AT michaelezehetleitner probabilitycueingofdistractorlocationsbothintertrialfacilitationandstatisticallearningmediateinterferencereduction
_version_ 1725772853207367680