Comparative characteristics of morphological features

Background and Study Aim. The purpose of the study is to give a comparative description of the somatotypes, anatomical components of the body, and motor qualities of female students studied at the university (Irkutsk, Russia) in 2009 and 2019. Material and methods. It was conducted the survey and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikhail Kolokoltsev, Larisa Kuznetsova, Wladyslaw Jagiello, Elena Romanova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IP Iermakov S.S. 2020-08-01
Series:Physical Education of Students
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sportedu.org.ua/index.php/PES/article/view/1199
id doaj-ac83e9d0465d4498be131d91de2dca8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac83e9d0465d4498be131d91de2dca8f2021-09-02T21:20:07ZengIP Iermakov S.S.Physical Education of Students2308-72502020-08-0124424225010.15561/20755279.2020.04071199Comparative characteristics of morphological featuresMikhail Kolokoltsev0Larisa Kuznetsova1Wladyslaw Jagiello2Elena Romanova3Irkutsk National Research Technical UniversityIrkutsk National Research Technical UniversityGdansk University of Physical Education and SportAltay State UniversityBackground and Study Aim. The purpose of the study is to give a comparative description of the somatotypes, anatomical components of the body, and motor qualities of female students studied at the university (Irkutsk, Russia) in 2009 and 2019. Material and methods. It was conducted the survey and somatotypological diagnosis of 1226 female students (in 2009 – n = 762; in 2019 – n = 464) on 27 anthropometric parameters. It was measured: Pinier index; the average value of the absolute and percentage of the bone component of the body (BC), the fat component of the body (FC), and muscle component of the body (MC). The following indicators were evaluated by motor tests: speed endurance and agility; speed; speed and strength endurance of the trunk flexor muscles; strength and endurance of the shoulder girdle muscles; dynamic strength of the lower limb muscles; active flexibility of the spine; overall endurance. Results. In 2019, compared to 2009, there was observed: a decrease (by 19.6%) in the number of normosthenic females; an increase in the number of hypersthenics (by 70.9%), and asthenics (by 27.4%); body weight gain; decrease in body length. The values of the following indicators significantly decreased in 2019: the trunk length, upper and lower limbs; chest circumference. There was a decrease in the average values of body circumference; shoulder width. It was observed an increase in pelvic width. In 2019, compared to 2009, the following indicators were determined in females of all somatotypes: a significant increase in body fat content and a decrease in muscle mass (p <0.05). As a result, the strength of the hands' dynamometry decreased. After 10 years, the bone component in the females’ body has not changed. Conclusions. The obtained data indicate a deterioration in all motor skills of females surveyed in 2019, compared to 2009. This is a consequence of the growing hypodynamics of modern youth. The obtained results of surveys expand the database of anthropometric and motor parameters of the young generation of Russia. This data can be used in planning training and coaching activities in educational and sports organizations.https://sportedu.org.ua/index.php/PES/article/view/1199physical culturefemale studentsanthropometric body componentssomatotypesmotor qualities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mikhail Kolokoltsev
Larisa Kuznetsova
Wladyslaw Jagiello
Elena Romanova
spellingShingle Mikhail Kolokoltsev
Larisa Kuznetsova
Wladyslaw Jagiello
Elena Romanova
Comparative characteristics of morphological features
Physical Education of Students
physical culture
female students
anthropometric body components
somatotypes
motor qualities
author_facet Mikhail Kolokoltsev
Larisa Kuznetsova
Wladyslaw Jagiello
Elena Romanova
author_sort Mikhail Kolokoltsev
title Comparative characteristics of morphological features
title_short Comparative characteristics of morphological features
title_full Comparative characteristics of morphological features
title_fullStr Comparative characteristics of morphological features
title_full_unstemmed Comparative characteristics of morphological features
title_sort comparative characteristics of morphological features
publisher IP Iermakov S.S.
series Physical Education of Students
issn 2308-7250
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Background and Study Aim. The purpose of the study is to give a comparative description of the somatotypes, anatomical components of the body, and motor qualities of female students studied at the university (Irkutsk, Russia) in 2009 and 2019. Material and methods. It was conducted the survey and somatotypological diagnosis of 1226 female students (in 2009 – n = 762; in 2019 – n = 464) on 27 anthropometric parameters. It was measured: Pinier index; the average value of the absolute and percentage of the bone component of the body (BC), the fat component of the body (FC), and muscle component of the body (MC). The following indicators were evaluated by motor tests: speed endurance and agility; speed; speed and strength endurance of the trunk flexor muscles; strength and endurance of the shoulder girdle muscles; dynamic strength of the lower limb muscles; active flexibility of the spine; overall endurance. Results. In 2019, compared to 2009, there was observed: a decrease (by 19.6%) in the number of normosthenic females; an increase in the number of hypersthenics (by 70.9%), and asthenics (by 27.4%); body weight gain; decrease in body length. The values of the following indicators significantly decreased in 2019: the trunk length, upper and lower limbs; chest circumference. There was a decrease in the average values of body circumference; shoulder width. It was observed an increase in pelvic width. In 2019, compared to 2009, the following indicators were determined in females of all somatotypes: a significant increase in body fat content and a decrease in muscle mass (p <0.05). As a result, the strength of the hands' dynamometry decreased. After 10 years, the bone component in the females’ body has not changed. Conclusions. The obtained data indicate a deterioration in all motor skills of females surveyed in 2019, compared to 2009. This is a consequence of the growing hypodynamics of modern youth. The obtained results of surveys expand the database of anthropometric and motor parameters of the young generation of Russia. This data can be used in planning training and coaching activities in educational and sports organizations.
topic physical culture
female students
anthropometric body components
somatotypes
motor qualities
url https://sportedu.org.ua/index.php/PES/article/view/1199
work_keys_str_mv AT mikhailkolokoltsev comparativecharacteristicsofmorphologicalfeatures
AT larisakuznetsova comparativecharacteristicsofmorphologicalfeatures
AT wladyslawjagiello comparativecharacteristicsofmorphologicalfeatures
AT elenaromanova comparativecharacteristicsofmorphologicalfeatures
_version_ 1717820012484362240