The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.

The sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for detecting microstructural white matter alterations has motivated the application of voxel-based statistics (VBS) to fractional anisotropy (FA) images (FA-VBS). However, detected group differences may depend on the spatial registration method used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siawoosh Mohammadi, Simon S Keller, Volkmar Glauche, Harald Kugel, Andreas Jansen, Chloe Hutton, Agnes Flöel, Michael Deppe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3367973?pdf=render
id doaj-ac54fd5b97914d2588a81323e39d0a8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac54fd5b97914d2588a81323e39d0a8c2020-11-25T02:24:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0176e3685110.1371/journal.pone.0036851The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.Siawoosh MohammadiSimon S KellerVolkmar GlaucheHarald KugelAndreas JansenChloe HuttonAgnes FlöelMichael DeppeThe sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for detecting microstructural white matter alterations has motivated the application of voxel-based statistics (VBS) to fractional anisotropy (FA) images (FA-VBS). However, detected group differences may depend on the spatial registration method used. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of spatial registration on detecting cerebral asymmetries in FA-VBS analyses with reference to data obtained using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS). In the first part of this study we performed FA-VBS analyses using three single-contrast and one multi-contrast registration: (i) whole-brain registration based on T2 contrast, (ii) whole-brain registration based on FA contrast, (iii) individual-hemisphere registration based on FA contrast, and (iv) a combination of (i) and (iii). We then compared the FA-VBS results with those obtained from TBSS. We found that the FA-VBS results depended strongly on the employed registration approach, with the best correspondence between FA-VBS and TBSS results when approach (iv), the "multi-contrast individual-hemisphere" method was employed. In the second part of the study, we investigated the spatial distribution of residual misregistration for each registration approach and the effect on FA-VBS results. For the FA-VBS analyses using the three single-contrast registration methods, we identified FA asymmetries that were (a) located in regions prone to misregistrations, (b) not detected by TBSS, and (c) specific to the applied registration approach. These asymmetries were considered candidates for apparent FA asymmetries due to systematic misregistrations associated with the FA-VBS approach. Finally, we demonstrated that the "multi-contrast individual-hemisphere" approach showed the least residual spatial misregistrations and thus might be most appropriate for cerebral FA-VBS analyses.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3367973?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siawoosh Mohammadi
Simon S Keller
Volkmar Glauche
Harald Kugel
Andreas Jansen
Chloe Hutton
Agnes Flöel
Michael Deppe
spellingShingle Siawoosh Mohammadi
Simon S Keller
Volkmar Glauche
Harald Kugel
Andreas Jansen
Chloe Hutton
Agnes Flöel
Michael Deppe
The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Siawoosh Mohammadi
Simon S Keller
Volkmar Glauche
Harald Kugel
Andreas Jansen
Chloe Hutton
Agnes Flöel
Michael Deppe
author_sort Siawoosh Mohammadi
title The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.
title_short The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.
title_full The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.
title_fullStr The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.
title_full_unstemmed The influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and TBSS.
title_sort influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and tbss.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for detecting microstructural white matter alterations has motivated the application of voxel-based statistics (VBS) to fractional anisotropy (FA) images (FA-VBS). However, detected group differences may depend on the spatial registration method used. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of spatial registration on detecting cerebral asymmetries in FA-VBS analyses with reference to data obtained using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS). In the first part of this study we performed FA-VBS analyses using three single-contrast and one multi-contrast registration: (i) whole-brain registration based on T2 contrast, (ii) whole-brain registration based on FA contrast, (iii) individual-hemisphere registration based on FA contrast, and (iv) a combination of (i) and (iii). We then compared the FA-VBS results with those obtained from TBSS. We found that the FA-VBS results depended strongly on the employed registration approach, with the best correspondence between FA-VBS and TBSS results when approach (iv), the "multi-contrast individual-hemisphere" method was employed. In the second part of the study, we investigated the spatial distribution of residual misregistration for each registration approach and the effect on FA-VBS results. For the FA-VBS analyses using the three single-contrast registration methods, we identified FA asymmetries that were (a) located in regions prone to misregistrations, (b) not detected by TBSS, and (c) specific to the applied registration approach. These asymmetries were considered candidates for apparent FA asymmetries due to systematic misregistrations associated with the FA-VBS approach. Finally, we demonstrated that the "multi-contrast individual-hemisphere" approach showed the least residual spatial misregistrations and thus might be most appropriate for cerebral FA-VBS analyses.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3367973?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT siawooshmohammadi theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT simonskeller theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT volkmarglauche theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT haraldkugel theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT andreasjansen theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT chloehutton theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT agnesfloel theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT michaeldeppe theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT siawooshmohammadi influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT simonskeller influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT volkmarglauche influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT haraldkugel influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT andreasjansen influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT chloehutton influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT agnesfloel influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
AT michaeldeppe influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss
_version_ 1724854388721188864