Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and Repositories

A knowledge economy has been defined as one in which the generation and exploitation of knowledge has come to play the predominant part in the creation of wealth. It is not simply about pushing back the frontiers of knowledge; it is also about the more effective use and exploitation of all types of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John W. Houghton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: openjournals.nl 2010-02-01
Series:Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.liberquarterly.eu/articles/10.18352/lq.7966/
id doaj-ac45cc5e1fbd45cfa56f3157630d3ab7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac45cc5e1fbd45cfa56f3157630d3ab72021-10-02T19:21:32Zengopenjournals.nlLiber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries2213-056X2010-02-01193-427529210.18352/lq.79667921Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and RepositoriesJohn W. Houghton0N/aA knowledge economy has been defined as one in which the generation and exploitation of knowledge has come to play the predominant part in the creation of wealth. It is not simply about pushing back the frontiers of knowledge; it is also about the more effective use and exploitation of all types of knowledge in all manner of economic activities. One key question is whether there are new opportunities and new models for scholarly publishing that might better serve researchers and more effectively communicate and disseminate research findings. Building on previous work, this paper looks at the costs and potential benefits of alternative models for scientific and scholarly publishing, describing the approach and methods used and summarising the findings of a study undertaken for JISC in the United Kingdom. It concludes that different publishing models can make a material difference to the costs faced by and benefits realised from research communication, and it seems likely that more open access would have substantial net benefits.http://www.liberquarterly.eu/articles/10.18352/lq.7966/Scientific and scholarly communicationeconomics of publishingopen accessOAI6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John W. Houghton
spellingShingle John W. Houghton
Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and Repositories
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries
Scientific and scholarly communication
economics of publishing
open access
OAI6
author_facet John W. Houghton
author_sort John W. Houghton
title Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and Repositories
title_short Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and Repositories
title_full Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and Repositories
title_fullStr Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and Repositories
title_full_unstemmed Economic Implications of Alternative Publishing Models: Self-archiving and Repositories
title_sort economic implications of alternative publishing models: self-archiving and repositories
publisher openjournals.nl
series Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries
issn 2213-056X
publishDate 2010-02-01
description A knowledge economy has been defined as one in which the generation and exploitation of knowledge has come to play the predominant part in the creation of wealth. It is not simply about pushing back the frontiers of knowledge; it is also about the more effective use and exploitation of all types of knowledge in all manner of economic activities. One key question is whether there are new opportunities and new models for scholarly publishing that might better serve researchers and more effectively communicate and disseminate research findings. Building on previous work, this paper looks at the costs and potential benefits of alternative models for scientific and scholarly publishing, describing the approach and methods used and summarising the findings of a study undertaken for JISC in the United Kingdom. It concludes that different publishing models can make a material difference to the costs faced by and benefits realised from research communication, and it seems likely that more open access would have substantial net benefits.
topic Scientific and scholarly communication
economics of publishing
open access
OAI6
url http://www.liberquarterly.eu/articles/10.18352/lq.7966/
work_keys_str_mv AT johnwhoughton economicimplicationsofalternativepublishingmodelsselfarchivingandrepositories
_version_ 1716847072817184768