The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study
ObjectiveTo derive and validate a new clinical prediction rule to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients admitted with suspected sepsis.DesignRetrospective prognostic study of prospectively collected data.SettingED.ParticipantsPatients aged ≥18 years who met two Systemic Inflammatory Respo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019-08-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e030922.full |
id |
doaj-ac32f89d81384c5c9fb3e30878d47b1a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ac32f89d81384c5c9fb3e30878d47b1a2021-03-22T09:02:44ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-08-019810.1136/bmjopen-2019-030922The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation studyNarani SivayohamLesley A BlakeShafi E TharimoopantavidaSaad ChughtaiAdil N HussainAndrew Rhodes0St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UKObjectiveTo derive and validate a new clinical prediction rule to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients admitted with suspected sepsis.DesignRetrospective prognostic study of prospectively collected data.SettingED.ParticipantsPatients aged ≥18 years who met two Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria or one Red Flag sepsis criteria on arrival, received intravenous antibiotics for a suspected infection and admitted.Primary outcome measureIn-hospital all-cause mortality.MethodThe data were divided into derivation and validation cohorts. The simplified-Mortality in Severe Sepsis in the ED score and quick-SOFA scores, refractory hypotension and lactate were collectively termed ‘component scores’ and cumulatively termed the ‘Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score’. Each patient in the derivation cohort received a score (0–3) for each component score. The REDS score ranged from 0 to 12. The component scores were subject to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the REDS and the components scores were constructed and their cut-off points identified. Scores above the cut-off points were deemed high-risk. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk category of the REDS score and component scores were compared. The REDS score was internally validated.Results2115 patients of whom 282 (13.3%) died in hospital. Derivation cohort: 1078 patients with 140 deaths (13%). The AUROC curve with 95% CI, cut-off point and sensitivity for mortality (95% CI) of the high-risk category of the REDS score were: derivation: 0.78 (0.75 to 0.80); ≥3; 85.0 (78 to 90.5). Validation: 0.74 (0.71 to 0.76); ≥3; 84.5 (77.5 to 90.0). The AUROC curve and the sensitivity for mortality of the REDS score was better than that of the component scores. Specificity and mortality rates for REDS scores of ≥3, ≥5 and ≥7 were 54.8%, 88.8% and 96.9% and 21.8%, 36.0% and 49.1%, respectively.ConclusionThe REDS score is a simple and objective score to risk-stratify ED patients with suspected sepsis.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e030922.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Narani Sivayoham Lesley A Blake Shafi E Tharimoopantavida Saad Chughtai Adil N Hussain Andrew Rhodes |
spellingShingle |
Narani Sivayoham Lesley A Blake Shafi E Tharimoopantavida Saad Chughtai Adil N Hussain Andrew Rhodes The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study BMJ Open |
author_facet |
Narani Sivayoham Lesley A Blake Shafi E Tharimoopantavida Saad Chughtai Adil N Hussain Andrew Rhodes |
author_sort |
Narani Sivayoham |
title |
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_short |
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_full |
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_fullStr |
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_sort |
reds score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open |
issn |
2044-6055 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
ObjectiveTo derive and validate a new clinical prediction rule to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients admitted with suspected sepsis.DesignRetrospective prognostic study of prospectively collected data.SettingED.ParticipantsPatients aged ≥18 years who met two Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria or one Red Flag sepsis criteria on arrival, received intravenous antibiotics for a suspected infection and admitted.Primary outcome measureIn-hospital all-cause mortality.MethodThe data were divided into derivation and validation cohorts. The simplified-Mortality in Severe Sepsis in the ED score and quick-SOFA scores, refractory hypotension and lactate were collectively termed ‘component scores’ and cumulatively termed the ‘Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score’. Each patient in the derivation cohort received a score (0–3) for each component score. The REDS score ranged from 0 to 12. The component scores were subject to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the REDS and the components scores were constructed and their cut-off points identified. Scores above the cut-off points were deemed high-risk. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk category of the REDS score and component scores were compared. The REDS score was internally validated.Results2115 patients of whom 282 (13.3%) died in hospital. Derivation cohort: 1078 patients with 140 deaths (13%). The AUROC curve with 95% CI, cut-off point and sensitivity for mortality (95% CI) of the high-risk category of the REDS score were: derivation: 0.78 (0.75 to 0.80); ≥3; 85.0 (78 to 90.5). Validation: 0.74 (0.71 to 0.76); ≥3; 84.5 (77.5 to 90.0). The AUROC curve and the sensitivity for mortality of the REDS score was better than that of the component scores. Specificity and mortality rates for REDS scores of ≥3, ≥5 and ≥7 were 54.8%, 88.8% and 96.9% and 21.8%, 36.0% and 49.1%, respectively.ConclusionThe REDS score is a simple and objective score to risk-stratify ED patients with suspected sepsis. |
url |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e030922.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT naranisivayoham theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT lesleyablake theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT shafietharimoopantavida theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT saadchughtai theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT adilnhussain theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT andrewrhodes theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT naranisivayoham redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT lesleyablake redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT shafietharimoopantavida redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT saadchughtai redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT adilnhussain redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT andrewrhodes redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy |
_version_ |
1724208954424164352 |