The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background The electronic health record (EHR) of the general physician (GP) is an important tool that can be used to assess and improve the quality of healthcare. However, there are some problems when (re) using the data gathered in the EHR for quality assessments. One problem is the lack o...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05259-9 |
id |
doaj-ac2a9ffd87404f81adc8cc9ca2627088 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ac2a9ffd87404f81adc8cc9ca26270882021-05-09T11:30:03ZengBMCTrials1745-62152021-05-012211910.1186/s13063-021-05259-9The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trialSteve Van den Bulck0Tine De Burghgraeve1Willem Raat2Pavlos Mamouris3Patrick Coursier4Patrik Vankrunkelsven5Geert Goderis6Rosella Hermens7Gijs Van Pottelbergh8Bert Vaes9Academic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenIQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center NijmegenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAbstract Background The electronic health record (EHR) of the general physician (GP) is an important tool that can be used to assess and improve the quality of healthcare. However, there are some problems when (re) using the data gathered in the EHR for quality assessments. One problem is the lack of data completeness in the EHR. Audit and feedback (A&F) is a well-known quality intervention that can improve the quality of healthcare. We hypothesize that an automated A&F intervention can be adapted to improve the data completeness of the EHR of the GP, more specifically, the number of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Methods This study is a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial with an intervention at the level of GP practice. The intervention consists of an audit and extended electronically delivered feedback with multiple components that will be delivered 4 times electronically to general practices over 12 months. The data will be analyzed on an aggregated level (per GP practice). The primary outcome is the percentage of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. The key secondary outcome is the registration of chronic kidney disease. Exploratory secondary outcomes are the registration of heart failure, biometric data and lifestyle habits, and the evolution of 4 different EHR-extractable quality indicators. Discussion This cluster randomized controlled trial intends to primarily improve the registration of type 2 diabetes in the EHR of the GP and to secondarily improve the registration of chronic kidney disease. In addition, the registration of heart failure, lifestyle parameters, and biometric data in the EHR of the GP are explored together with 4 EHR-extractable quality indicators. By doing so, this study aims to improve the data completeness of the EHR, paving the way for future quality assessments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04388228 . Registered on May 14, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05259-9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steve Van den Bulck Tine De Burghgraeve Willem Raat Pavlos Mamouris Patrick Coursier Patrik Vankrunkelsven Geert Goderis Rosella Hermens Gijs Van Pottelbergh Bert Vaes |
spellingShingle |
Steve Van den Bulck Tine De Burghgraeve Willem Raat Pavlos Mamouris Patrick Coursier Patrik Vankrunkelsven Geert Goderis Rosella Hermens Gijs Van Pottelbergh Bert Vaes The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial Trials |
author_facet |
Steve Van den Bulck Tine De Burghgraeve Willem Raat Pavlos Mamouris Patrick Coursier Patrik Vankrunkelsven Geert Goderis Rosella Hermens Gijs Van Pottelbergh Bert Vaes |
author_sort |
Steve Van den Bulck |
title |
The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Trials |
issn |
1745-6215 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The electronic health record (EHR) of the general physician (GP) is an important tool that can be used to assess and improve the quality of healthcare. However, there are some problems when (re) using the data gathered in the EHR for quality assessments. One problem is the lack of data completeness in the EHR. Audit and feedback (A&F) is a well-known quality intervention that can improve the quality of healthcare. We hypothesize that an automated A&F intervention can be adapted to improve the data completeness of the EHR of the GP, more specifically, the number of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Methods This study is a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial with an intervention at the level of GP practice. The intervention consists of an audit and extended electronically delivered feedback with multiple components that will be delivered 4 times electronically to general practices over 12 months. The data will be analyzed on an aggregated level (per GP practice). The primary outcome is the percentage of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. The key secondary outcome is the registration of chronic kidney disease. Exploratory secondary outcomes are the registration of heart failure, biometric data and lifestyle habits, and the evolution of 4 different EHR-extractable quality indicators. Discussion This cluster randomized controlled trial intends to primarily improve the registration of type 2 diabetes in the EHR of the GP and to secondarily improve the registration of chronic kidney disease. In addition, the registration of heart failure, lifestyle parameters, and biometric data in the EHR of the GP are explored together with 4 EHR-extractable quality indicators. By doing so, this study aims to improve the data completeness of the EHR, paving the way for future quality assessments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04388228 . Registered on May 14, 2020. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05259-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stevevandenbulck theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tinedeburghgraeve theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT willemraat theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pavlosmamouris theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patrickcoursier theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patrikvankrunkelsven theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT geertgoderis theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rosellahermens theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gijsvanpottelbergh theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bertvaes theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stevevandenbulck effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tinedeburghgraeve effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT willemraat effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pavlosmamouris effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patrickcoursier effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patrikvankrunkelsven effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT geertgoderis effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rosellahermens effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gijsvanpottelbergh effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bertvaes effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1721454299305738240 |