The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background The electronic health record (EHR) of the general physician (GP) is an important tool that can be used to assess and improve the quality of healthcare. However, there are some problems when (re) using the data gathered in the EHR for quality assessments. One problem is the lack o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steve Van den Bulck, Tine De Burghgraeve, Willem Raat, Pavlos Mamouris, Patrick Coursier, Patrik Vankrunkelsven, Geert Goderis, Rosella Hermens, Gijs Van Pottelbergh, Bert Vaes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05259-9
id doaj-ac2a9ffd87404f81adc8cc9ca2627088
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac2a9ffd87404f81adc8cc9ca26270882021-05-09T11:30:03ZengBMCTrials1745-62152021-05-012211910.1186/s13063-021-05259-9The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trialSteve Van den Bulck0Tine De Burghgraeve1Willem Raat2Pavlos Mamouris3Patrick Coursier4Patrik Vankrunkelsven5Geert Goderis6Rosella Hermens7Gijs Van Pottelbergh8Bert Vaes9Academic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenIQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center NijmegenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAcademic Center for General Practice, KU LeuvenAbstract Background The electronic health record (EHR) of the general physician (GP) is an important tool that can be used to assess and improve the quality of healthcare. However, there are some problems when (re) using the data gathered in the EHR for quality assessments. One problem is the lack of data completeness in the EHR. Audit and feedback (A&F) is a well-known quality intervention that can improve the quality of healthcare. We hypothesize that an automated A&F intervention can be adapted to improve the data completeness of the EHR of the GP, more specifically, the number of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Methods This study is a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial with an intervention at the level of GP practice. The intervention consists of an audit and extended electronically delivered feedback with multiple components that will be delivered 4 times electronically to general practices over 12 months. The data will be analyzed on an aggregated level (per GP practice). The primary outcome is the percentage of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. The key secondary outcome is the registration of chronic kidney disease. Exploratory secondary outcomes are the registration of heart failure, biometric data and lifestyle habits, and the evolution of 4 different EHR-extractable quality indicators. Discussion This cluster randomized controlled trial intends to primarily improve the registration of type 2 diabetes in the EHR of the GP and to secondarily improve the registration of chronic kidney disease. In addition, the registration of heart failure, lifestyle parameters, and biometric data in the EHR of the GP are explored together with 4 EHR-extractable quality indicators. By doing so, this study aims to improve the data completeness of the EHR, paving the way for future quality assessments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04388228 . Registered on May 14, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05259-9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steve Van den Bulck
Tine De Burghgraeve
Willem Raat
Pavlos Mamouris
Patrick Coursier
Patrik Vankrunkelsven
Geert Goderis
Rosella Hermens
Gijs Van Pottelbergh
Bert Vaes
spellingShingle Steve Van den Bulck
Tine De Burghgraeve
Willem Raat
Pavlos Mamouris
Patrick Coursier
Patrik Vankrunkelsven
Geert Goderis
Rosella Hermens
Gijs Van Pottelbergh
Bert Vaes
The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Trials
author_facet Steve Van den Bulck
Tine De Burghgraeve
Willem Raat
Pavlos Mamouris
Patrick Coursier
Patrik Vankrunkelsven
Geert Goderis
Rosella Hermens
Gijs Van Pottelbergh
Bert Vaes
author_sort Steve Van den Bulck
title The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of automated audit and feedback on data completeness in the electronic health record of the general physician: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background The electronic health record (EHR) of the general physician (GP) is an important tool that can be used to assess and improve the quality of healthcare. However, there are some problems when (re) using the data gathered in the EHR for quality assessments. One problem is the lack of data completeness in the EHR. Audit and feedback (A&F) is a well-known quality intervention that can improve the quality of healthcare. We hypothesize that an automated A&F intervention can be adapted to improve the data completeness of the EHR of the GP, more specifically, the number of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Methods This study is a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial with an intervention at the level of GP practice. The intervention consists of an audit and extended electronically delivered feedback with multiple components that will be delivered 4 times electronically to general practices over 12 months. The data will be analyzed on an aggregated level (per GP practice). The primary outcome is the percentage of correctly registered diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. The key secondary outcome is the registration of chronic kidney disease. Exploratory secondary outcomes are the registration of heart failure, biometric data and lifestyle habits, and the evolution of 4 different EHR-extractable quality indicators. Discussion This cluster randomized controlled trial intends to primarily improve the registration of type 2 diabetes in the EHR of the GP and to secondarily improve the registration of chronic kidney disease. In addition, the registration of heart failure, lifestyle parameters, and biometric data in the EHR of the GP are explored together with 4 EHR-extractable quality indicators. By doing so, this study aims to improve the data completeness of the EHR, paving the way for future quality assessments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04388228 . Registered on May 14, 2020.
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05259-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stevevandenbulck theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tinedeburghgraeve theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT willemraat theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pavlosmamouris theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT patrickcoursier theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT patrikvankrunkelsven theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geertgoderis theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rosellahermens theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gijsvanpottelbergh theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertvaes theeffectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stevevandenbulck effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tinedeburghgraeve effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT willemraat effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pavlosmamouris effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT patrickcoursier effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT patrikvankrunkelsven effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geertgoderis effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rosellahermens effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gijsvanpottelbergh effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertvaes effectofautomatedauditandfeedbackondatacompletenessintheelectronichealthrecordofthegeneralphysicianprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721454299305738240