Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration

Equity is important to most individuals and its perceived absence  may impact negatively on individual and organisational performance. The concept of equity presupposes fair treatment, while discrimination implies unfair treatment. The perceptions of discrimination, or being treated unfairly, may re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renier Steyn, Leon Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-05-01
Series:South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
Online Access:https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/761
id doaj-ac24cd3b5d61407096bbf923899753b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac24cd3b5d61407096bbf923899753b52020-11-24T23:18:13ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences1015-88122222-34362015-05-0118219020510.4102/sajems.v18i2.761440Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remunerationRenier Steyn0Leon Jackson1University of South AfricaNoth West UniversityEquity is important to most individuals and its perceived absence  may impact negatively on individual and organisational performance. The concept of equity presupposes fair treatment, while discrimination implies unfair treatment. The perceptions of discrimination, or being treated unfairly, may result from psycho-social processes, or from data that justifies discrimination and is quantifiable. Objectives: To assess whether differences in post grading and remuneration for males and females are based on gender, rather than on quantifiable variables that could justify these differences. Method: Biographical information was gathered from 1740 employees representing 29 organisations. The data collected included self-reported post grading (dependent variable) and 14 independent variables, which may predict the employees’ post gradings. The independent variables related primarily to education, tenure and family responsibility. Results: Males reported higher post gradings and higher salaries than those of females, but the difference was not statistically significant and the practical significance of this difference was slight. Qualification types, job specific training, and membership of professional bodies did not affect post grading along gender lines. The ways in which work experience was measured had no influence on post grading or salary for either males or females. Furthermore, family responsibility, union membership and the type of work the employees performed did not influence the employees’ post grading. The only difference found concerned the unfair treatment of males, particularly those who were well-qualified.   Conclusions: Objective evidence of unfair gender-based discrimination affecting post grading and salary is scarce, and the few differences that do occur have little statistical and practical significance. Perceptions of being discriminated against may therefore more often be seen as the result of psycho-social processes and are not necessarily the result of justifiable differences in education, tenure and family responsibility.https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/761
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renier Steyn
Leon Jackson
spellingShingle Renier Steyn
Leon Jackson
Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
author_facet Renier Steyn
Leon Jackson
author_sort Renier Steyn
title Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration
title_short Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration
title_full Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration
title_fullStr Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration
title_full_unstemmed Gender-based discrimination in South Africa: A quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration
title_sort gender-based discrimination in south africa: a quantitative analysis of fairness of remuneration
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
issn 1015-8812
2222-3436
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Equity is important to most individuals and its perceived absence  may impact negatively on individual and organisational performance. The concept of equity presupposes fair treatment, while discrimination implies unfair treatment. The perceptions of discrimination, or being treated unfairly, may result from psycho-social processes, or from data that justifies discrimination and is quantifiable. Objectives: To assess whether differences in post grading and remuneration for males and females are based on gender, rather than on quantifiable variables that could justify these differences. Method: Biographical information was gathered from 1740 employees representing 29 organisations. The data collected included self-reported post grading (dependent variable) and 14 independent variables, which may predict the employees’ post gradings. The independent variables related primarily to education, tenure and family responsibility. Results: Males reported higher post gradings and higher salaries than those of females, but the difference was not statistically significant and the practical significance of this difference was slight. Qualification types, job specific training, and membership of professional bodies did not affect post grading along gender lines. The ways in which work experience was measured had no influence on post grading or salary for either males or females. Furthermore, family responsibility, union membership and the type of work the employees performed did not influence the employees’ post grading. The only difference found concerned the unfair treatment of males, particularly those who were well-qualified.   Conclusions: Objective evidence of unfair gender-based discrimination affecting post grading and salary is scarce, and the few differences that do occur have little statistical and practical significance. Perceptions of being discriminated against may therefore more often be seen as the result of psycho-social processes and are not necessarily the result of justifiable differences in education, tenure and family responsibility.
url https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/761
work_keys_str_mv AT reniersteyn genderbaseddiscriminationinsouthafricaaquantitativeanalysisoffairnessofremuneration
AT leonjackson genderbaseddiscriminationinsouthafricaaquantitativeanalysisoffairnessofremuneration
_version_ 1725581478715195392