Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.

Visuospatial working memory enables us to maintain access to visual information for processing even when a stimulus is no longer present, due to occlusion, our own movements, or transience of the stimulus. Here we show that, when localizing remembered stimuli, the precision of spatial recall does no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Aagten-Murphy, Paul M Bays
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-02-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006563
id doaj-ac221330a5b24641ad72b31bceb5f6c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac221330a5b24641ad72b31bceb5f6c22021-06-19T05:31:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582019-02-01152e100656310.1371/journal.pcbi.1006563Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.David Aagten-MurphyPaul M BaysVisuospatial working memory enables us to maintain access to visual information for processing even when a stimulus is no longer present, due to occlusion, our own movements, or transience of the stimulus. Here we show that, when localizing remembered stimuli, the precision of spatial recall does not rely solely on memory for individual stimuli, but additionally depends on the relative distances between stimuli and visual landmarks in the surroundings. Across three separate experiments, we consistently observed a spatially selective improvement in the precision of recall for items located near a persistent landmark. While the results did not require that the landmark be visible throughout the memory delay period, it was essential that it was visible both during encoding and response. We present a simple model that can accurately capture human performance by considering relative (allocentric) spatial information as an independent localization estimate which degrades with distance and is optimally integrated with egocentric spatial information. Critically, allocentric information was encoded without cost to egocentric estimation, demonstrating independent storage of the two sources of information. Finally, when egocentric and allocentric estimates were put in conflict, the model successfully predicted the resulting localization errors. We suggest that the relative distance between stimuli represents an additional, independent spatial cue for memory recall. This cue information is likely to be critical for spatial localization in natural settings which contain an abundance of visual landmarks.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006563
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Aagten-Murphy
Paul M Bays
spellingShingle David Aagten-Murphy
Paul M Bays
Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet David Aagten-Murphy
Paul M Bays
author_sort David Aagten-Murphy
title Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.
title_short Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.
title_full Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.
title_fullStr Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.
title_full_unstemmed Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.
title_sort independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Visuospatial working memory enables us to maintain access to visual information for processing even when a stimulus is no longer present, due to occlusion, our own movements, or transience of the stimulus. Here we show that, when localizing remembered stimuli, the precision of spatial recall does not rely solely on memory for individual stimuli, but additionally depends on the relative distances between stimuli and visual landmarks in the surroundings. Across three separate experiments, we consistently observed a spatially selective improvement in the precision of recall for items located near a persistent landmark. While the results did not require that the landmark be visible throughout the memory delay period, it was essential that it was visible both during encoding and response. We present a simple model that can accurately capture human performance by considering relative (allocentric) spatial information as an independent localization estimate which degrades with distance and is optimally integrated with egocentric spatial information. Critically, allocentric information was encoded without cost to egocentric estimation, demonstrating independent storage of the two sources of information. Finally, when egocentric and allocentric estimates were put in conflict, the model successfully predicted the resulting localization errors. We suggest that the relative distance between stimuli represents an additional, independent spatial cue for memory recall. This cue information is likely to be critical for spatial localization in natural settings which contain an abundance of visual landmarks.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006563
work_keys_str_mv AT davidaagtenmurphy independentworkingmemoryresourcesforegocentricandallocentricspatialinformation
AT paulmbays independentworkingmemoryresourcesforegocentricandallocentricspatialinformation
_version_ 1721371277970636800