Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash Illusions

The illusion of a single pulse of light seen as two flashes has been known for nearly a century (Dunlop, 1915). Bowen (1989) extended this earlier work for multiple bright pulses of light—two flashes seen as three, etc. He attempted to explain these illusions in terms of putative multiphasic respons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trevor J. Hine, Amanda M. V. White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-05-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/ic220
id doaj-ac046ca4f8c8443da1d508d5a61ee093
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac046ca4f8c8443da1d508d5a61ee0932020-11-25T04:01:09ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952011-05-01210.1068/ic22010.1068_ic220Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash IllusionsTrevor J. Hine0Amanda M. V. White1Department of Psychology, Griffith UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Griffith UniversityThe illusion of a single pulse of light seen as two flashes has been known for nearly a century (Dunlop, 1915). Bowen (1989) extended this earlier work for multiple bright pulses of light—two flashes seen as three, etc. He attempted to explain these illusions in terms of putative multiphasic responses in the visual system. The sound induced flash illusion (SIFI) is another example of extra flashes being reported beyond what is presented. Following Bowen, we modelled the biphasic temporal responses of actual fast ON- and OFF- midget parasol M cells to visual stimuli we had previously used in our SIFI research. Could the auditory stimuli (beeps) be directing attention to short duration peaks in stimulation, thus biasing the response of the observer in reporting the number of transient events? We show that for square wave temporal profile such response bias could easily be the case, especially given that three or four clicks rarely yield an illusion of more than two flashes. On the other hand, we experimentally produced more numerous and reliable fission SIFIs in sawtooth profiles that did not generate such peaks of excitation. This strongly suggests that a decisional-level explanation of the SIFI is not adequate.https://doi.org/10.1068/ic220
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trevor J. Hine
Amanda M. V. White
spellingShingle Trevor J. Hine
Amanda M. V. White
Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash Illusions
i-Perception
author_facet Trevor J. Hine
Amanda M. V. White
author_sort Trevor J. Hine
title Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash Illusions
title_short Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash Illusions
title_full Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash Illusions
title_fullStr Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash Illusions
title_full_unstemmed Biphasic M-Cell Responses to Stimuli Producing Sound-Induced Flash Illusions
title_sort biphasic m-cell responses to stimuli producing sound-induced flash illusions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2011-05-01
description The illusion of a single pulse of light seen as two flashes has been known for nearly a century (Dunlop, 1915). Bowen (1989) extended this earlier work for multiple bright pulses of light—two flashes seen as three, etc. He attempted to explain these illusions in terms of putative multiphasic responses in the visual system. The sound induced flash illusion (SIFI) is another example of extra flashes being reported beyond what is presented. Following Bowen, we modelled the biphasic temporal responses of actual fast ON- and OFF- midget parasol M cells to visual stimuli we had previously used in our SIFI research. Could the auditory stimuli (beeps) be directing attention to short duration peaks in stimulation, thus biasing the response of the observer in reporting the number of transient events? We show that for square wave temporal profile such response bias could easily be the case, especially given that three or four clicks rarely yield an illusion of more than two flashes. On the other hand, we experimentally produced more numerous and reliable fission SIFIs in sawtooth profiles that did not generate such peaks of excitation. This strongly suggests that a decisional-level explanation of the SIFI is not adequate.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/ic220
work_keys_str_mv AT trevorjhine biphasicmcellresponsestostimuliproducingsoundinducedflashillusions
AT amandamvwhite biphasicmcellresponsestostimuliproducingsoundinducedflashillusions
_version_ 1724447547893743616