Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education change

Abstract Background Social network analysis (SNA) literature suggests that leaders should be well connected and can be identified through network measurements. Other literature suggests that identifying leaders ideally involves multiple methods. However, it is unclear using SNA alone is sufficient f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexis V. Knaub, Charles Henderson, Kathleen Quardokus Fisher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-06-01
Series:International Journal of STEM Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-018-0124-5
id doaj-abfde1b20e8f439eae3627943ac4e633
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abfde1b20e8f439eae3627943ac4e6332020-11-25T01:20:31ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222018-06-015111410.1186/s40594-018-0124-5Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education changeAlexis V. Knaub0Charles Henderson1Kathleen Quardokus Fisher2Western Michigan UniversityWestern Michigan UniversityFlorida International UniversityAbstract Background Social network analysis (SNA) literature suggests that leaders should be well connected and can be identified through network measurements. Other literature suggests that identifying leaders ideally involves multiple methods. However, it is unclear using SNA alone is sufficient for identifying leaders for higher education change initiatives. We used two sets of data, teaching discussion network data taken at three different times and respondent nominations for leaders, to determine whether these two methods identify the same individuals as leaders. Results Respondent-nominated leaders have more direct and indirect ties on average than non-leaders, which aligns with the SNA literature. However, when looking at individuals as leaders, many respondent-nominated leaders would not be identified using SNA because they are poorly connected. Also, many individuals who were not nominated would have been considered leaders because they are well connected. Further examining these results did not indicate why there is such a difference between the SNA-identified and respondent-nominated leaders. Conclusions While these two methods identify some of the same individuals as leaders, there are many differences between the two methods. Using just one method may not be adequate for ensuring that suitable individuals are selected to lead these projects. We recommend multiple methods when selecting leaders.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-018-0124-5Social network analysisHigher education changeHigher education leadership
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexis V. Knaub
Charles Henderson
Kathleen Quardokus Fisher
spellingShingle Alexis V. Knaub
Charles Henderson
Kathleen Quardokus Fisher
Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education change
International Journal of STEM Education
Social network analysis
Higher education change
Higher education leadership
author_facet Alexis V. Knaub
Charles Henderson
Kathleen Quardokus Fisher
author_sort Alexis V. Knaub
title Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education change
title_short Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education change
title_full Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education change
title_fullStr Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education change
title_full_unstemmed Finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in STEM education change
title_sort finding the leaders: an examination of social network analysis and leadership identification in stem education change
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of STEM Education
issn 2196-7822
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background Social network analysis (SNA) literature suggests that leaders should be well connected and can be identified through network measurements. Other literature suggests that identifying leaders ideally involves multiple methods. However, it is unclear using SNA alone is sufficient for identifying leaders for higher education change initiatives. We used two sets of data, teaching discussion network data taken at three different times and respondent nominations for leaders, to determine whether these two methods identify the same individuals as leaders. Results Respondent-nominated leaders have more direct and indirect ties on average than non-leaders, which aligns with the SNA literature. However, when looking at individuals as leaders, many respondent-nominated leaders would not be identified using SNA because they are poorly connected. Also, many individuals who were not nominated would have been considered leaders because they are well connected. Further examining these results did not indicate why there is such a difference between the SNA-identified and respondent-nominated leaders. Conclusions While these two methods identify some of the same individuals as leaders, there are many differences between the two methods. Using just one method may not be adequate for ensuring that suitable individuals are selected to lead these projects. We recommend multiple methods when selecting leaders.
topic Social network analysis
Higher education change
Higher education leadership
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-018-0124-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alexisvknaub findingtheleadersanexaminationofsocialnetworkanalysisandleadershipidentificationinstemeducationchange
AT charleshenderson findingtheleadersanexaminationofsocialnetworkanalysisandleadershipidentificationinstemeducationchange
AT kathleenquardokusfisher findingtheleadersanexaminationofsocialnetworkanalysisandleadershipidentificationinstemeducationchange
_version_ 1725133834031202304