Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.

OBJECTIVES:To determine the diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (SWMR) for the detection of pineal gland calcifications (PGC) compared to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. METHODS:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa C Adams, Sarah M Böker, Yvonne Y Bender, Gerd Diederichs, Eva M Fallenberg, Moritz Wagner, Bernd Hamm, Marcus R Makowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5344338?pdf=render
id doaj-abed9bcb4684419e90b71952ea3e9c86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abed9bcb4684419e90b71952ea3e9c862020-11-25T02:05:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01123e017276410.1371/journal.pone.0172764Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.Lisa C AdamsSarah M BökerYvonne Y BenderGerd DiederichsEva M FallenbergMoritz WagnerBernd HammMarcus R MakowskiOBJECTIVES:To determine the diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (SWMR) for the detection of pineal gland calcifications (PGC) compared to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. METHODS:384 patients who received a 1.5 Tesla MRI scan including SWMR sequences and a CT scan of the brain between January 2014 and October 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. 346 patients were included in the analysis, of which 214 showed PGC on CT scans. To assess correlation between imaging modalities, the maximum calcification diameter was used. Sensitivity and specificity and intra- and interobserver reliability were calculated for SWMR and conventional MRI sequences. RESULTS:SWMR reached a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 91%-97%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI: 91%-99%) for the detection of PGC, whereas conventional MRI achieved a sensitivity of 43% (95% CI: 36%-50%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI: 91%-99%). Detection rates for calcifications in SWMR and conventional MRI differed significantly (95% versus 43%, p<0.001). Diameter measurements between SWMR and CT showed a close correlation (R2 = 0.85, p<0.001) with a slight but not significant overestimation of size (SWMR: 6.5 mm ± 2.5; CT: 5.9 mm ± 2.4, p = 0.02). Interobserver-agreement for diameter measurements was excellent on SWMR (ICC = 0.984, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Combining SWMR magnitude and phase information enables the accurate detection of PGC and offers a better diagnostic performance than conventional MRI with CT as a reference standard.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5344338?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisa C Adams
Sarah M Böker
Yvonne Y Bender
Gerd Diederichs
Eva M Fallenberg
Moritz Wagner
Bernd Hamm
Marcus R Makowski
spellingShingle Lisa C Adams
Sarah M Böker
Yvonne Y Bender
Gerd Diederichs
Eva M Fallenberg
Moritz Wagner
Bernd Hamm
Marcus R Makowski
Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lisa C Adams
Sarah M Böker
Yvonne Y Bender
Gerd Diederichs
Eva M Fallenberg
Moritz Wagner
Bernd Hamm
Marcus R Makowski
author_sort Lisa C Adams
title Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description OBJECTIVES:To determine the diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (SWMR) for the detection of pineal gland calcifications (PGC) compared to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. METHODS:384 patients who received a 1.5 Tesla MRI scan including SWMR sequences and a CT scan of the brain between January 2014 and October 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. 346 patients were included in the analysis, of which 214 showed PGC on CT scans. To assess correlation between imaging modalities, the maximum calcification diameter was used. Sensitivity and specificity and intra- and interobserver reliability were calculated for SWMR and conventional MRI sequences. RESULTS:SWMR reached a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 91%-97%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI: 91%-99%) for the detection of PGC, whereas conventional MRI achieved a sensitivity of 43% (95% CI: 36%-50%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI: 91%-99%). Detection rates for calcifications in SWMR and conventional MRI differed significantly (95% versus 43%, p<0.001). Diameter measurements between SWMR and CT showed a close correlation (R2 = 0.85, p<0.001) with a slight but not significant overestimation of size (SWMR: 6.5 mm ± 2.5; CT: 5.9 mm ± 2.4, p = 0.02). Interobserver-agreement for diameter measurements was excellent on SWMR (ICC = 0.984, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Combining SWMR magnitude and phase information enables the accurate detection of PGC and offers a better diagnostic performance than conventional MRI with CT as a reference standard.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5344338?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lisacadams diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
AT sarahmboker diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
AT yvonneybender diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
AT gerddiederichs diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
AT evamfallenberg diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
AT moritzwagner diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
AT berndhamm diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
AT marcusrmakowski diagnosticaccuracyofsusceptibilityweightedmagneticresonanceimagingfortheevaluationofpinealglandcalcification
_version_ 1724938748077015040