A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields

Background: The aim of this study was to design an algorithm for the calculation of monitor unit (MU) in a short time and high precision for different radiotherapy (RT) fields. Materials and Methods: The algorithm for calculating MU for the stated patients was designed in MATLAB software. To investi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Seif, Nayyer Mostafavi, Mohammadreza Bayatiyani, Hossein Taheri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Advanced Biomedical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=46;epage=46;aulast=Seif
id doaj-abe01ee8c6884d71b809e73dad092a1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abe01ee8c6884d71b809e73dad092a1a2020-11-25T01:54:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvanced Biomedical Research2277-91752019-01-0181464610.4103/abr.abr_238_18A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment FieldsFatemeh SeifNayyer MostafaviMohammadreza BayatiyaniHossein TaheriBackground: The aim of this study was to design an algorithm for the calculation of monitor unit (MU) in a short time and high precision for different radiotherapy (RT) fields. Materials and Methods: The algorithm for calculating MU for the stated patients was designed in MATLAB software. To investigate the efficiency of this algorithm, 11 regular chest fields with the sizes of 7 cm × 7 cm up to 17 cm × 17 cm were considered, and the obtained MUs were compared with MUs of 13 patients which were calculated with a “hand calculation” which is used in some RT centers for the aforementioned fields. Results: The maximum percentage of calculation errors of regular fields at the depths of 4 and 10 cm were 1 and 0.8, respectively. The maximum and minimum percentage of calculation errors in irregular fields was 3 and 0.9, respectively. Furthermore, the maximum and minimum errors were 8.8 and 0.14, respectively. In addition, relative percentages of the MUs for irregular fields of chest and supraclavicular were 1.63 and 1.01, respectively. Conclusion: Calculation of MUs is suggested to be performed with the novel proposed algorithm, due to reduce the treatment time, and also provide high accuracy and precision compared to hand calculation.http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=46;epage=46;aulast=SeifDose-calculation algorithmmonitor unit calculationregular and irregular treatment fields
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fatemeh Seif
Nayyer Mostafavi
Mohammadreza Bayatiyani
Hossein Taheri
spellingShingle Fatemeh Seif
Nayyer Mostafavi
Mohammadreza Bayatiyani
Hossein Taheri
A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields
Advanced Biomedical Research
Dose-calculation algorithm
monitor unit calculation
regular and irregular treatment fields
author_facet Fatemeh Seif
Nayyer Mostafavi
Mohammadreza Bayatiyani
Hossein Taheri
author_sort Fatemeh Seif
title A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields
title_short A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields
title_full A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields
title_fullStr A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Algorithm in Radiation Dosimetry of Regular and Irregular Treatment Fields
title_sort novel algorithm in radiation dosimetry of regular and irregular treatment fields
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Advanced Biomedical Research
issn 2277-9175
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background: The aim of this study was to design an algorithm for the calculation of monitor unit (MU) in a short time and high precision for different radiotherapy (RT) fields. Materials and Methods: The algorithm for calculating MU for the stated patients was designed in MATLAB software. To investigate the efficiency of this algorithm, 11 regular chest fields with the sizes of 7 cm × 7 cm up to 17 cm × 17 cm were considered, and the obtained MUs were compared with MUs of 13 patients which were calculated with a “hand calculation” which is used in some RT centers for the aforementioned fields. Results: The maximum percentage of calculation errors of regular fields at the depths of 4 and 10 cm were 1 and 0.8, respectively. The maximum and minimum percentage of calculation errors in irregular fields was 3 and 0.9, respectively. Furthermore, the maximum and minimum errors were 8.8 and 0.14, respectively. In addition, relative percentages of the MUs for irregular fields of chest and supraclavicular were 1.63 and 1.01, respectively. Conclusion: Calculation of MUs is suggested to be performed with the novel proposed algorithm, due to reduce the treatment time, and also provide high accuracy and precision compared to hand calculation.
topic Dose-calculation algorithm
monitor unit calculation
regular and irregular treatment fields
url http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=46;epage=46;aulast=Seif
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehseif anovelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
AT nayyermostafavi anovelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
AT mohammadrezabayatiyani anovelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
AT hosseintaheri anovelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
AT fatemehseif novelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
AT nayyermostafavi novelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
AT mohammadrezabayatiyani novelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
AT hosseintaheri novelalgorithminradiationdosimetryofregularandirregulartreatmentfields
_version_ 1724987174262145024