Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?

Objective: To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists’ perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units during one month in 200...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Claudia Yoshikumi Prestes, Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda, Gianni Mara Silva dos Santos, Ligia Maria Suppo de Souza Rugolo, Maria Regina Bentlin, Mauricio Magalhães, Paulo Roberto Pachi, Sergio Tadeu Martins Marba, Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas, Ruth Guinsburg
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Elsevier 2016-01-01
Series:Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553615001627
id doaj-abd09175b1d549a2add50364b2323ea3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abd09175b1d549a2add50364b2323ea32020-11-24T22:25:50ZporElsevierJornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português)2255-55362016-01-01921889510.1016/j.jpedp.2015.11.003Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?Ana Claudia Yoshikumi Prestes0Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda1Gianni Mara Silva dos Santos2Ligia Maria Suppo de Souza Rugolo3Maria Regina Bentlin4Mauricio Magalhães5Paulo Roberto Pachi6Sergio Tadeu Martins Marba7Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas8Ruth Guinsburg9Divisão de Medicina Neonatal, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, BrasilDivisão de Medicina Neonatal, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, BrasilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, BrasilDepartamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, BrasilDepartamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, BrasilDepartamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, BrasilDepartamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, BrasilDepartamento de Pediatria, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, BrasilDivisão de Neonatologia, Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti, Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher (CAISM), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BrasilDivisão de Medicina Neonatal, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, BrasilObjective: To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists’ perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture, tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and post‐operative period using a 10‐cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain > 3 cm). Results: For lumbar puncture, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40% to 50% reported VAS > 3 for lumbar puncture in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS > 3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for mechanical ventilation, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient‐days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS > 3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three post‐operative days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS > 3 for major surgeries. Conclusions: Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten‐year period.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553615001627Pain measurementPain perceptionPain managementNeonatal intensive care unitsNewborn
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Claudia Yoshikumi Prestes
Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda
Gianni Mara Silva dos Santos
Ligia Maria Suppo de Souza Rugolo
Maria Regina Bentlin
Mauricio Magalhães
Paulo Roberto Pachi
Sergio Tadeu Martins Marba
Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas
Ruth Guinsburg
spellingShingle Ana Claudia Yoshikumi Prestes
Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda
Gianni Mara Silva dos Santos
Ligia Maria Suppo de Souza Rugolo
Maria Regina Bentlin
Mauricio Magalhães
Paulo Roberto Pachi
Sergio Tadeu Martins Marba
Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas
Ruth Guinsburg
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?
Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português)
Pain measurement
Pain perception
Pain management
Neonatal intensive care units
Newborn
author_facet Ana Claudia Yoshikumi Prestes
Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda
Gianni Mara Silva dos Santos
Ligia Maria Suppo de Souza Rugolo
Maria Regina Bentlin
Mauricio Magalhães
Paulo Roberto Pachi
Sergio Tadeu Martins Marba
Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas
Ruth Guinsburg
author_sort Ana Claudia Yoshikumi Prestes
title Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?
title_short Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?
title_full Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?
title_fullStr Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?
title_full_unstemmed Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?
title_sort painful procedures and analgesia in the nicu: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten‐year period?
publisher Elsevier
series Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português)
issn 2255-5536
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Objective: To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists’ perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture, tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and post‐operative period using a 10‐cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain > 3 cm). Results: For lumbar puncture, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40% to 50% reported VAS > 3 for lumbar puncture in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS > 3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for mechanical ventilation, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient‐days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS > 3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three post‐operative days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS > 3 for major surgeries. Conclusions: Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten‐year period.
topic Pain measurement
Pain perception
Pain management
Neonatal intensive care units
Newborn
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553615001627
work_keys_str_mv AT anaclaudiayoshikumiprestes painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT ritadecassiaxavierbalda painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT giannimarasilvadossantos painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT ligiamariasuppodesouzarugolo painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT mariareginabentlin painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT mauriciomagalhaes painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT paulorobertopachi painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT sergiotadeumartinsmarba painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT jamilpedrodesiqueiracaldas painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
AT ruthguinsburg painfulproceduresandanalgesiainthenicuwhathaschangedinthemedicalperceptionandpracticeinatenyearperiod
_version_ 1725756060237561856