An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program

Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kara P. Wiseman, Lindsay Hauser, Connie Clark, Onyiyoza Odumosu, Neely Dahl, Jennifer Peregoy, Christina W. Sheffield, Robert C. Klesges, Roger T. Anderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4707
id doaj-abbc4a41e8a3432c8fda0533a5e138f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abbc4a41e8a3432c8fda0533a5e138f62020-11-25T02:45:35ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-06-01174707470710.3390/ijerph17134707An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment ProgramKara P. Wiseman0Lindsay Hauser1Connie Clark2Onyiyoza Odumosu3Neely Dahl4Jennifer Peregoy5Christina W. Sheffield6Robert C. Klesges7Roger T. Anderson8Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USACancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USACancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USACancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USACancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USACancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USACancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USADepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USADepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USATobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4707Cancer survivorshipsmoking cessationquality improvementprocess mapping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kara P. Wiseman
Lindsay Hauser
Connie Clark
Onyiyoza Odumosu
Neely Dahl
Jennifer Peregoy
Christina W. Sheffield
Robert C. Klesges
Roger T. Anderson
spellingShingle Kara P. Wiseman
Lindsay Hauser
Connie Clark
Onyiyoza Odumosu
Neely Dahl
Jennifer Peregoy
Christina W. Sheffield
Robert C. Klesges
Roger T. Anderson
An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Cancer survivorship
smoking cessation
quality improvement
process mapping
author_facet Kara P. Wiseman
Lindsay Hauser
Connie Clark
Onyiyoza Odumosu
Neely Dahl
Jennifer Peregoy
Christina W. Sheffield
Robert C. Klesges
Roger T. Anderson
author_sort Kara P. Wiseman
title An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_short An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_full An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_sort evaluation of the process and quality improvement measures of the university of virginia cancer center tobacco treatment program
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support.
topic Cancer survivorship
smoking cessation
quality improvement
process mapping
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4707
work_keys_str_mv AT karapwiseman anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT lindsayhauser anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT connieclark anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT onyiyozaodumosu anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT neelydahl anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT jenniferperegoy anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT christinawsheffield anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT robertcklesges anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT rogertanderson anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT karapwiseman evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT lindsayhauser evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT connieclark evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT onyiyozaodumosu evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT neelydahl evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT jenniferperegoy evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT christinawsheffield evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT robertcklesges evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT rogertanderson evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
_version_ 1724761808246407168