Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation

Depending on the radiation field, the absorbed dose rate can depend significantly upon the size of the detectors or the phantom used in the models. In deep space (interplanetary medium) the radiation field is on avarage dominated by Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) nuclei. Here, the deep space dose rate th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Banjac Saša, Berger Lars, Burmeister Sönke, Guo Jingnan, Heber Bernd, Herbst Konstantin, Wimmer-Schweingruber Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2019/01/swsc180075/swsc180075.html
id doaj-abb9ac47ef9a4ffb97222a3927d13b09
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abb9ac47ef9a4ffb97222a3927d13b092021-03-02T09:28:05ZengEDP SciencesJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate2115-72512019-01-019A1410.1051/swsc/2019014swsc180075Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulationBanjac SašaBerger LarsBurmeister SönkeGuo JingnanHeber BerndHerbst KonstantinWimmer-Schweingruber RobertDepending on the radiation field, the absorbed dose rate can depend significantly upon the size of the detectors or the phantom used in the models. In deep space (interplanetary medium) the radiation field is on avarage dominated by Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) nuclei. Here, the deep space dose rate that a typical small silicon slab detector measures is compared to a larger phantom corresponding to an ICRU sphere with a 15 cm radius composed of water. To separate and understand respective effects from the composition, size and shape differences in the detectors, this comparison is implemented in several steps. For each phantom, the absorbed dose rate due to GCR nuclei up to Z = 28, as a function of solar modulation conditions, is calculated. The main components of the GCR flux are protons, followed by helium nuclei and electrons, with Z > 2 nuclei accounting for approximately 1% of the total number of particles. Among the light nuclei with Z > 2, most abundant ones are C, N and O. In this study, we use the GEANT4 model to calculate the absorbed dose (energy deposited as ionization, divided by mass) due to the GCR flux provided by the Badhwar-O’Neill 2010 (BON-10) model. Furthermore, we investigate how the determined absorbed dose rate changes throughout the solar cycle by varying the GCR models from solar minimum to solar maximum conditions. The developed model is validated against the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) microdosimeter measurements. In our current approach, we do not consider the effects of shielding, which will always be present under realistic scenarios. A second goal of this study is to quantify the contribution of each Z = 1, …, 28 GCR nuclei to absorbed dose rate, in relation to the phantom characteristics. For each Z we determine the most relevant energy range in the GCR spectra for absorbed dose rate estimations. Furthermore, we calculate a solar modulation dependent conversion factor to convert absorbed dose rate measured in silicon to absorbed dose rate in water. This information will improve our understanding of the radiation environment due to GCR in the near-Earth deep space and also benefit further modeling efforts by limiting the number and energy range of primary particle species that have to be considered.https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2019/01/swsc180075/swsc180075.htmlabsorbed dose rateradiation environmentcosmic raydosimetrydeep space
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Banjac Saša
Berger Lars
Burmeister Sönke
Guo Jingnan
Heber Bernd
Herbst Konstantin
Wimmer-Schweingruber Robert
spellingShingle Banjac Saša
Berger Lars
Burmeister Sönke
Guo Jingnan
Heber Bernd
Herbst Konstantin
Wimmer-Schweingruber Robert
Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
absorbed dose rate
radiation environment
cosmic ray
dosimetry
deep space
author_facet Banjac Saša
Berger Lars
Burmeister Sönke
Guo Jingnan
Heber Bernd
Herbst Konstantin
Wimmer-Schweingruber Robert
author_sort Banjac Saša
title Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation
title_short Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation
title_full Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation
title_fullStr Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation
title_full_unstemmed Galactic Cosmic Ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – Accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation
title_sort galactic cosmic ray induced absorbed dose rate in deep space – accounting for detector size, shape, material, as well as for the solar modulation
publisher EDP Sciences
series Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
issn 2115-7251
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Depending on the radiation field, the absorbed dose rate can depend significantly upon the size of the detectors or the phantom used in the models. In deep space (interplanetary medium) the radiation field is on avarage dominated by Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) nuclei. Here, the deep space dose rate that a typical small silicon slab detector measures is compared to a larger phantom corresponding to an ICRU sphere with a 15 cm radius composed of water. To separate and understand respective effects from the composition, size and shape differences in the detectors, this comparison is implemented in several steps. For each phantom, the absorbed dose rate due to GCR nuclei up to Z = 28, as a function of solar modulation conditions, is calculated. The main components of the GCR flux are protons, followed by helium nuclei and electrons, with Z > 2 nuclei accounting for approximately 1% of the total number of particles. Among the light nuclei with Z > 2, most abundant ones are C, N and O. In this study, we use the GEANT4 model to calculate the absorbed dose (energy deposited as ionization, divided by mass) due to the GCR flux provided by the Badhwar-O’Neill 2010 (BON-10) model. Furthermore, we investigate how the determined absorbed dose rate changes throughout the solar cycle by varying the GCR models from solar minimum to solar maximum conditions. The developed model is validated against the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) microdosimeter measurements. In our current approach, we do not consider the effects of shielding, which will always be present under realistic scenarios. A second goal of this study is to quantify the contribution of each Z = 1, …, 28 GCR nuclei to absorbed dose rate, in relation to the phantom characteristics. For each Z we determine the most relevant energy range in the GCR spectra for absorbed dose rate estimations. Furthermore, we calculate a solar modulation dependent conversion factor to convert absorbed dose rate measured in silicon to absorbed dose rate in water. This information will improve our understanding of the radiation environment due to GCR in the near-Earth deep space and also benefit further modeling efforts by limiting the number and energy range of primary particle species that have to be considered.
topic absorbed dose rate
radiation environment
cosmic ray
dosimetry
deep space
url https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2019/01/swsc180075/swsc180075.html
work_keys_str_mv AT banjacsasa galacticcosmicrayinducedabsorbeddoserateindeepspaceaccountingfordetectorsizeshapematerialaswellasforthesolarmodulation
AT bergerlars galacticcosmicrayinducedabsorbeddoserateindeepspaceaccountingfordetectorsizeshapematerialaswellasforthesolarmodulation
AT burmeistersonke galacticcosmicrayinducedabsorbeddoserateindeepspaceaccountingfordetectorsizeshapematerialaswellasforthesolarmodulation
AT guojingnan galacticcosmicrayinducedabsorbeddoserateindeepspaceaccountingfordetectorsizeshapematerialaswellasforthesolarmodulation
AT heberbernd galacticcosmicrayinducedabsorbeddoserateindeepspaceaccountingfordetectorsizeshapematerialaswellasforthesolarmodulation
AT herbstkonstantin galacticcosmicrayinducedabsorbeddoserateindeepspaceaccountingfordetectorsizeshapematerialaswellasforthesolarmodulation
AT wimmerschweingruberrobert galacticcosmicrayinducedabsorbeddoserateindeepspaceaccountingfordetectorsizeshapematerialaswellasforthesolarmodulation
_version_ 1724239417946669056