An investigation of numeral quantifiers in English
There exist a broad range of theories which model quantifier scope (Ruys & Winter 2011). The empirical coverage and predictions of three theories: Quantifier Raising (May 1985) with Scope Economy (Fox 2000), Feature Checking (Beghelli & Stowell 1997), and Choice Functions (Winter 1997) are t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/391 |
id |
doaj-abb61b0b6753420ca306c7b62fedf958 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-abb61b0b6753420ca306c7b62fedf9582021-09-02T14:57:22ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352019-09-014110.5334/gjgl.391410An investigation of numeral quantifiers in EnglishCole Ira Brendel0Department of Linguistics Languages and Communication, Salt Lake City, UTThere exist a broad range of theories which model quantifier scope (Ruys & Winter 2011). The empirical coverage and predictions of three theories: Quantifier Raising (May 1985) with Scope Economy (Fox 2000), Feature Checking (Beghelli & Stowell 1997), and Choice Functions (Winter 1997) are tested using a sentence-picture verification task. Speakers rated the quality of sentences with bare and modified numeral quantifiers in surface and inverse scope conditions. In Experiment 1, it was discovered that bare numerals marginally resisted inverse scope, contra the predictions of (Beghelli & Stowell 1997). Experiment 2 revealed that the scope of numerals is clause-bound, in argument against the theory of Choice Functions which predict extra-clausal scope for existential quantifiers. The results suggest that a modified QR theory best accounts for the observed data.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/391QuantifiersNumeralsExperimental SemanticsSyntaxScope |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cole Ira Brendel |
spellingShingle |
Cole Ira Brendel An investigation of numeral quantifiers in English Glossa Quantifiers Numerals Experimental Semantics Syntax Scope |
author_facet |
Cole Ira Brendel |
author_sort |
Cole Ira Brendel |
title |
An investigation of numeral quantifiers in English |
title_short |
An investigation of numeral quantifiers in English |
title_full |
An investigation of numeral quantifiers in English |
title_fullStr |
An investigation of numeral quantifiers in English |
title_full_unstemmed |
An investigation of numeral quantifiers in English |
title_sort |
investigation of numeral quantifiers in english |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
There exist a broad range of theories which model quantifier scope (Ruys & Winter 2011). The empirical coverage and predictions of three theories: Quantifier Raising (May 1985) with Scope Economy (Fox 2000), Feature Checking (Beghelli & Stowell 1997), and Choice Functions (Winter 1997) are tested using a sentence-picture verification task. Speakers rated the quality of sentences with bare and modified numeral quantifiers in surface and inverse scope conditions. In Experiment 1, it was discovered that bare numerals marginally resisted inverse scope, contra the predictions of (Beghelli & Stowell 1997). Experiment 2 revealed that the scope of numerals is clause-bound, in argument against the theory of Choice Functions which predict extra-clausal scope for existential quantifiers. The results suggest that a modified QR theory best accounts for the observed data. |
topic |
Quantifiers Numerals Experimental Semantics Syntax Scope |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/391 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT coleirabrendel aninvestigationofnumeralquantifiersinenglish AT coleirabrendel investigationofnumeralquantifiersinenglish |
_version_ |
1721174181279694848 |