Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey

Objectives To understand attitudes towards infertility and willingness to pay (WTP) towards a publicly funded national assistive reproductive therapies (ART) programme.Design Attitudes survey with dichotomous and open-ended WTP questions.Setting Online survey administered in the USA, UK, Spain, Norw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Skedgel, Eleanor Ralphs, Elaine Finn, Marie Markert, Carl Samuelsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e044986.full
id doaj-abadbf6c96a54a369f305a47ec304df9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abadbf6c96a54a369f305a47ec304df92021-07-02T13:04:21ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-03-0111310.1136/bmjopen-2020-044986Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry surveyChris Skedgel0Eleanor Ralphs1Elaine Finn2Marie Markert3Carl Samuelsen4Office of Health Economics, London, UKIQVIA, London, UKIQVIA, London, UKFerring Pharmaceuticals, København, DenmarkFerring Pharmaceuticals, København, DenmarkObjectives To understand attitudes towards infertility and willingness to pay (WTP) towards a publicly funded national assistive reproductive therapies (ART) programme.Design Attitudes survey with dichotomous and open-ended WTP questions.Setting Online survey administered in the USA, UK, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and China.Participants 7945 respondents, analysed by country. Nordic respondents were pooled into a regionally representative sample.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measures were proportion of sample agreeing with different infertility-related and ART-related value statements and supporting a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, expressed in local currency. Secondary outcome measure was maximum WTP.Results Across the nationally representative samples, 75.5% of all respondents agreed with infertility as a medical condition and 82.3% and 83.7% with ART eligibility for anyone who has difficulty having a baby or a medical problem preventing them from having a baby, respectively. 56.4% of respondents supported a defined monthly contribution and 73.9% supported at least some additional contribution to fund a national ART programme. Overall, converting to euros, median maximum WTP was €3.00 and mean was €15.47 (95% CI 14.23 to 16.72) per month. Maximum WTP was highest in China and the USA and lowest in the European samples.Conclusions This large, multicountry survey extends our understanding of public attitudes towards infertility and fertility treatment beyond Europe. It finds evidence that a majority of the public in all sampled countries/regions views infertility as a treatable medical condition and supports the idea that all infertile individuals should have access to treatments that improve the chance of conception. There was also strong agreement with the idea that the desire for children is a basic human need. WTP questions showed that a majority of respondents supported a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, although there is some evidence of an acquiescence bias that may overstate support among specific samples.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e044986.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chris Skedgel
Eleanor Ralphs
Elaine Finn
Marie Markert
Carl Samuelsen
spellingShingle Chris Skedgel
Eleanor Ralphs
Elaine Finn
Marie Markert
Carl Samuelsen
Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey
BMJ Open
author_facet Chris Skedgel
Eleanor Ralphs
Elaine Finn
Marie Markert
Carl Samuelsen
author_sort Chris Skedgel
title Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey
title_short Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey
title_full Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey
title_fullStr Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey
title_full_unstemmed Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey
title_sort is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? results from a multicountry survey
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objectives To understand attitudes towards infertility and willingness to pay (WTP) towards a publicly funded national assistive reproductive therapies (ART) programme.Design Attitudes survey with dichotomous and open-ended WTP questions.Setting Online survey administered in the USA, UK, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and China.Participants 7945 respondents, analysed by country. Nordic respondents were pooled into a regionally representative sample.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measures were proportion of sample agreeing with different infertility-related and ART-related value statements and supporting a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, expressed in local currency. Secondary outcome measure was maximum WTP.Results Across the nationally representative samples, 75.5% of all respondents agreed with infertility as a medical condition and 82.3% and 83.7% with ART eligibility for anyone who has difficulty having a baby or a medical problem preventing them from having a baby, respectively. 56.4% of respondents supported a defined monthly contribution and 73.9% supported at least some additional contribution to fund a national ART programme. Overall, converting to euros, median maximum WTP was €3.00 and mean was €15.47 (95% CI 14.23 to 16.72) per month. Maximum WTP was highest in China and the USA and lowest in the European samples.Conclusions This large, multicountry survey extends our understanding of public attitudes towards infertility and fertility treatment beyond Europe. It finds evidence that a majority of the public in all sampled countries/regions views infertility as a treatable medical condition and supports the idea that all infertile individuals should have access to treatments that improve the chance of conception. There was also strong agreement with the idea that the desire for children is a basic human need. WTP questions showed that a majority of respondents supported a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, although there is some evidence of an acquiescence bias that may overstate support among specific samples.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e044986.full
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisskedgel isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey
AT eleanorralphs isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey
AT elainefinn isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey
AT mariemarkert isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey
AT carlsamuelsen isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey
_version_ 1721329363184517120