The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case study

At the end of 2005 and in 2006, the Western Cape suffered extended blackouts. The cuts came as a shock and customers were loud in their criticism of Eskom and the City of Cape Town’s failure to provide a reliable electricity supply. The utility Eskom’s responses included the introduction of an aggre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nthabiseng Mohlakoana, Wendy Annecke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2017-10-01
Series:Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
Online Access:https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/3306
id doaj-abad6b9c59c4455da09014321d2792f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abad6b9c59c4455da09014321d2792f22020-11-24T21:23:50ZengUniversity of Cape TownJournal of Energy in Southern Africa1021-447X2413-30512017-10-0120421010.17159/2413-3051/2009/v20i4a33063306The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case studyNthabiseng Mohlakoana0Wendy AnneckeUniversity of Cape TownAt the end of 2005 and in 2006, the Western Cape suffered extended blackouts. The cuts came as a shock and customers were loud in their criticism of Eskom and the City of Cape Town’s failure to provide a reliable electricity supply. The utility Eskom’s responses included the introduction of an aggressive Demand Side Management (DSM) programme with the goal of saving electricity and reducing the need to shed customers. In Khayelitsha, Cape Town, the DSM programme entailed an exchange and subsidy programme: households were encouraged to swop their two-plate electric stoves for Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) stoves. This intervention is the subject of this paper. The results of the study were analysed in terms of the socio-economic characteristics of the sample interviewed, multiple fuel use and transition trends in households in urban areas, changes in behaviour in electricity and LPG use, changing perceptions of LPG and the impact of the intervention. Previous studies in household energy use showed that people perceived LPG to be dangerous saying that it posed a greater danger to the household than paraffin since it might explode. Surprisingly, during the electricity power cuts in 2006, people in low-income communities, readily accepted LPG stoves in great numbers and a year later, up to 89% of the households surveyed, reported still using LPG for cooking.https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/3306
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nthabiseng Mohlakoana
Wendy Annecke
spellingShingle Nthabiseng Mohlakoana
Wendy Annecke
The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case study
Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
author_facet Nthabiseng Mohlakoana
Wendy Annecke
author_sort Nthabiseng Mohlakoana
title The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case study
title_short The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case study
title_full The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case study
title_fullStr The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case study
title_full_unstemmed The use of liquefied petroleum gas by South African low-income urban households: A case study
title_sort use of liquefied petroleum gas by south african low-income urban households: a case study
publisher University of Cape Town
series Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
issn 1021-447X
2413-3051
publishDate 2017-10-01
description At the end of 2005 and in 2006, the Western Cape suffered extended blackouts. The cuts came as a shock and customers were loud in their criticism of Eskom and the City of Cape Town’s failure to provide a reliable electricity supply. The utility Eskom’s responses included the introduction of an aggressive Demand Side Management (DSM) programme with the goal of saving electricity and reducing the need to shed customers. In Khayelitsha, Cape Town, the DSM programme entailed an exchange and subsidy programme: households were encouraged to swop their two-plate electric stoves for Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) stoves. This intervention is the subject of this paper. The results of the study were analysed in terms of the socio-economic characteristics of the sample interviewed, multiple fuel use and transition trends in households in urban areas, changes in behaviour in electricity and LPG use, changing perceptions of LPG and the impact of the intervention. Previous studies in household energy use showed that people perceived LPG to be dangerous saying that it posed a greater danger to the household than paraffin since it might explode. Surprisingly, during the electricity power cuts in 2006, people in low-income communities, readily accepted LPG stoves in great numbers and a year later, up to 89% of the households surveyed, reported still using LPG for cooking.
url https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/3306
work_keys_str_mv AT nthabisengmohlakoana theuseofliquefiedpetroleumgasbysouthafricanlowincomeurbanhouseholdsacasestudy
AT wendyannecke theuseofliquefiedpetroleumgasbysouthafricanlowincomeurbanhouseholdsacasestudy
AT nthabisengmohlakoana useofliquefiedpetroleumgasbysouthafricanlowincomeurbanhouseholdsacasestudy
AT wendyannecke useofliquefiedpetroleumgasbysouthafricanlowincomeurbanhouseholdsacasestudy
_version_ 1725991000125472768