ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

The object of this paper is a court order on motion to dismiss indictment in the Republic of Kosova. This order is a non-meritorious decision, by which the court dismisses the indictment because it lacks jurisdiction on procedural grounds. The order on the defendant’s motion constitutes a relativel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azem HAJDARI, Albulna HAJDARI
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Inonu University 2019-06-01
Series:İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/754485
id doaj-abac6c8d9bb24acfa83af175c486412a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abac6c8d9bb24acfa83af175c486412a2020-11-24T22:09:11ZdeuInonu Universityİnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi2146-10822667-57142019-06-0110129229910.21492/inuhfd.481982ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENTAzem HAJDARI0Albulna HAJDARIUniversity of PristinaThe object of this paper is a court order on motion to dismiss indictment in the Republic of Kosova. This order is a non-meritorious decision, by which the court dismisses the indictment because it lacks jurisdiction on procedural grounds. The order on the defendant’s motion constitutes a relatively common type of judgment rendered in criminal proceedings in Kosovo. This article will address such orders in several respects including the meaning of the order, its characteristics, grounds for dismissal and the authority to render it, as well as the procedure for and effects of reaching this type of verdict. To that effect, cases before the Basic Courts of Kosovo in which the defendant’s motion filed with the court asking the judge to throw out certain criminal charges during the proceedings in a period between 2015 and 2017 will be studied. The paper aims to foster the expectations that concrete actions should be taken to advance the performance of judges and prosecutors, highlighting the need to undertake a more effective vetting of public prosecutors and judges in the country. For this, there is an increasing support in local and international public opinion where the belief that Kosovo has already achieved a successful criminal justice system prevails. A legal, comparative, analytical and statistical methodology is used for the preparations of the present work.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/754485courtprosecutorordermotion to dismissjurisdictionthe defendantprosecuto
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Azem HAJDARI
Albulna HAJDARI
spellingShingle Azem HAJDARI
Albulna HAJDARI
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
court
prosecutor
order
motion to dismiss
jurisdiction
the defendant
prosecuto
author_facet Azem HAJDARI
Albulna HAJDARI
author_sort Azem HAJDARI
title ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
title_short ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
title_full ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
title_fullStr ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
title_full_unstemmed ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
title_sort order on motion to dismiss indictment
publisher Inonu University
series İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
issn 2146-1082
2667-5714
publishDate 2019-06-01
description The object of this paper is a court order on motion to dismiss indictment in the Republic of Kosova. This order is a non-meritorious decision, by which the court dismisses the indictment because it lacks jurisdiction on procedural grounds. The order on the defendant’s motion constitutes a relatively common type of judgment rendered in criminal proceedings in Kosovo. This article will address such orders in several respects including the meaning of the order, its characteristics, grounds for dismissal and the authority to render it, as well as the procedure for and effects of reaching this type of verdict. To that effect, cases before the Basic Courts of Kosovo in which the defendant’s motion filed with the court asking the judge to throw out certain criminal charges during the proceedings in a period between 2015 and 2017 will be studied. The paper aims to foster the expectations that concrete actions should be taken to advance the performance of judges and prosecutors, highlighting the need to undertake a more effective vetting of public prosecutors and judges in the country. For this, there is an increasing support in local and international public opinion where the belief that Kosovo has already achieved a successful criminal justice system prevails. A legal, comparative, analytical and statistical methodology is used for the preparations of the present work.
topic court
prosecutor
order
motion to dismiss
jurisdiction
the defendant
prosecuto
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/754485
work_keys_str_mv AT azemhajdari orderonmotiontodismissindictment
AT albulnahajdari orderonmotiontodismissindictment
_version_ 1725813178893336576