Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine Learning
Global surface currents are usually inferred from directly observed quantities like sea-surface height, wind stress by applying diagnostic balance relations (like geostrophy and Ekman flow), which provide a good approximation of the dynamics of slow, large-scale currents at large scales and low Ross...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Marine Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.672477/full |
id |
doaj-abaae9b19240443fb8dbd4b3d5e6c484 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-abaae9b19240443fb8dbd4b3d5e6c4842021-06-09T06:44:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452021-06-01810.3389/fmars.2021.672477672477Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine LearningAnirban Sinha0Ryan Abernathey1Environmental Science and Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United StatesDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United StatesGlobal surface currents are usually inferred from directly observed quantities like sea-surface height, wind stress by applying diagnostic balance relations (like geostrophy and Ekman flow), which provide a good approximation of the dynamics of slow, large-scale currents at large scales and low Rossby numbers. However, newer generation satellite altimeters (like the upcoming SWOT mission) will capture more of the high wavenumber variability associated with the unbalanced components, but the low temporal sampling can potentially lead to aliasing. Applying these balances directly may lead to an incorrect un-physical estimate of the surface flow. In this study we explore Machine Learning (ML) algorithms as an alternate route to infer surface currents from satellite observable quantities. We train our ML models with SSH, SST, and wind stress from available primitive equation ocean GCM simulation outputs as the inputs and make predictions of surface currents (u,v), which are then compared against the true GCM output. As a baseline example, we demonstrate that a linear regression model is ineffective at predicting velocities accurately beyond localized regions. In comparison, a relatively simple neural network (NN) can predict surface currents accurately over most of the global ocean, with lower mean squared errors than geostrophy + Ekman. Using a local stencil of neighboring grid points as additional input features, we can train the deep learning models to effectively “learn” spatial gradients and the physics of surface currents. By passing the stenciled variables through convolutional filters we can help the model learn spatial gradients much faster. Various training strategies are explored using systematic feature hold out and multiple combinations of point and stenciled input data fed through convolutional filters (2D/3D), to understand the effect of each input feature on the NN's ability to accurately represent surface flow. A model sensitivity analysis reveals that besides SSH, geographic information in some form is an essential ingredient required for making accurate predictions of surface currents with deep learning models.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.672477/fulldeep learning-artificial neural networksurface current balancegeostrophic balanceEkman flowregressionpredictive modeling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anirban Sinha Ryan Abernathey |
spellingShingle |
Anirban Sinha Ryan Abernathey Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine Learning Frontiers in Marine Science deep learning-artificial neural network surface current balance geostrophic balance Ekman flow regression predictive modeling |
author_facet |
Anirban Sinha Ryan Abernathey |
author_sort |
Anirban Sinha |
title |
Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine Learning |
title_short |
Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine Learning |
title_full |
Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine Learning |
title_fullStr |
Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimating Ocean Surface Currents With Machine Learning |
title_sort |
estimating ocean surface currents with machine learning |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Marine Science |
issn |
2296-7745 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Global surface currents are usually inferred from directly observed quantities like sea-surface height, wind stress by applying diagnostic balance relations (like geostrophy and Ekman flow), which provide a good approximation of the dynamics of slow, large-scale currents at large scales and low Rossby numbers. However, newer generation satellite altimeters (like the upcoming SWOT mission) will capture more of the high wavenumber variability associated with the unbalanced components, but the low temporal sampling can potentially lead to aliasing. Applying these balances directly may lead to an incorrect un-physical estimate of the surface flow. In this study we explore Machine Learning (ML) algorithms as an alternate route to infer surface currents from satellite observable quantities. We train our ML models with SSH, SST, and wind stress from available primitive equation ocean GCM simulation outputs as the inputs and make predictions of surface currents (u,v), which are then compared against the true GCM output. As a baseline example, we demonstrate that a linear regression model is ineffective at predicting velocities accurately beyond localized regions. In comparison, a relatively simple neural network (NN) can predict surface currents accurately over most of the global ocean, with lower mean squared errors than geostrophy + Ekman. Using a local stencil of neighboring grid points as additional input features, we can train the deep learning models to effectively “learn” spatial gradients and the physics of surface currents. By passing the stenciled variables through convolutional filters we can help the model learn spatial gradients much faster. Various training strategies are explored using systematic feature hold out and multiple combinations of point and stenciled input data fed through convolutional filters (2D/3D), to understand the effect of each input feature on the NN's ability to accurately represent surface flow. A model sensitivity analysis reveals that besides SSH, geographic information in some form is an essential ingredient required for making accurate predictions of surface currents with deep learning models. |
topic |
deep learning-artificial neural network surface current balance geostrophic balance Ekman flow regression predictive modeling |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.672477/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anirbansinha estimatingoceansurfacecurrentswithmachinelearning AT ryanabernathey estimatingoceansurfacecurrentswithmachinelearning |
_version_ |
1721388274169151488 |