Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Caesarean section might increase the incidence of surgical interventions and problems resulting from hospitalization and thus affecting quality of life in women after delivery. This study aimed to compare quality of life in women aft...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kazemnejad Anoshirvan, Lamyian Minoor, Parsay Sousan, Torkan Behnaz, Montazeri Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-01-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/4
id doaj-aba569a8d94241ba94ff3b4f5eddf2a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aba569a8d94241ba94ff3b4f5eddf2a42020-11-25T00:18:55ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932009-01-0191410.1186/1471-2393-9-4Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean sectionKazemnejad AnoshirvanLamyian MinoorParsay SousanTorkan BehnazMontazeri Ali<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Caesarean section might increase the incidence of surgical interventions and problems resulting from hospitalization and thus affecting quality of life in women after delivery. This study aimed to compare quality of life in women after normal delivery and caesarean section.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was a prospective study. A sample of women with normal delivery and caesarean section from 5 health care centers in Isfahan, Iran were entered into the study. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 at two points in time (time 1: 6 to 8 weeks after delivery; time 2: 12 to 14 weeks after delivery). Data were analyzed to compare quality of life in the two study groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In all 100 women were interviewed (50 with normal delivery and 50 with caesarean section). Postnatal quality of life in both groups was improved from time1 to time 2. However, comparing the mean scores between the normal and caesarean delivery groups the results showed that in general the normal vaginal delivery group had a better quality of life for almost all subscales in both assessment times. The differences were significant for vitality (mean score 62.9 vs. 54.4 P = 0.03) and mental health (mean score 75.1 vs. 66.7, P = 0.03) at first assessment and for physical functioning (mean score 88.4 vs. 81.5, P = 0.03) at second evaluation. However, comparing the findings within each group the analysis showed that the normal vaginal delivery group improved more on physical health related quality of life while the caesarean section group improved more on mental health related quality of life.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although the study did not show a clear cut benefit in favor of either methods of delivery that are normal vaginal delivery or caesarean section, the findings suggest that normal vaginal delivery might lead to a better quality of life especially resulting in a superior physical health. Indeed in the absence of medical indications normal vaginal delivery might be better to be considered as the first priority in term pregnancy.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kazemnejad Anoshirvan
Lamyian Minoor
Parsay Sousan
Torkan Behnaz
Montazeri Ali
spellingShingle Kazemnejad Anoshirvan
Lamyian Minoor
Parsay Sousan
Torkan Behnaz
Montazeri Ali
Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
author_facet Kazemnejad Anoshirvan
Lamyian Minoor
Parsay Sousan
Torkan Behnaz
Montazeri Ali
author_sort Kazemnejad Anoshirvan
title Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_short Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_full Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_fullStr Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_sort postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Caesarean section might increase the incidence of surgical interventions and problems resulting from hospitalization and thus affecting quality of life in women after delivery. This study aimed to compare quality of life in women after normal delivery and caesarean section.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was a prospective study. A sample of women with normal delivery and caesarean section from 5 health care centers in Isfahan, Iran were entered into the study. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 at two points in time (time 1: 6 to 8 weeks after delivery; time 2: 12 to 14 weeks after delivery). Data were analyzed to compare quality of life in the two study groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In all 100 women were interviewed (50 with normal delivery and 50 with caesarean section). Postnatal quality of life in both groups was improved from time1 to time 2. However, comparing the mean scores between the normal and caesarean delivery groups the results showed that in general the normal vaginal delivery group had a better quality of life for almost all subscales in both assessment times. The differences were significant for vitality (mean score 62.9 vs. 54.4 P = 0.03) and mental health (mean score 75.1 vs. 66.7, P = 0.03) at first assessment and for physical functioning (mean score 88.4 vs. 81.5, P = 0.03) at second evaluation. However, comparing the findings within each group the analysis showed that the normal vaginal delivery group improved more on physical health related quality of life while the caesarean section group improved more on mental health related quality of life.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although the study did not show a clear cut benefit in favor of either methods of delivery that are normal vaginal delivery or caesarean section, the findings suggest that normal vaginal delivery might lead to a better quality of life especially resulting in a superior physical health. Indeed in the absence of medical indications normal vaginal delivery might be better to be considered as the first priority in term pregnancy.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/4
work_keys_str_mv AT kazemnejadanoshirvan postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT lamyianminoor postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT parsaysousan postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT torkanbehnaz postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT montazeriali postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
_version_ 1725374328580603904