The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.

Smoking has been identified as the second greatest risk factor for global death and disability and has impacts on the oral cavity from aesthetic changes to fatal diseases such as oral cancer. The paper presents a secondary analysis of the National Adult Dental Health Survey (2009). The analysis used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Csikar, Jing Kang, Ceri Wyborn, Tom A Dyer, Zoe Marshman, Jenny Godson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4749304?pdf=render
id doaj-ab92256e539d4df09593dc7d13d3fbaf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab92256e539d4df09593dc7d13d3fbaf2020-11-25T02:45:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014870010.1371/journal.pone.0148700The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.Julia CsikarJing KangCeri WybornTom A DyerZoe MarshmanJenny GodsonSmoking has been identified as the second greatest risk factor for global death and disability and has impacts on the oral cavity from aesthetic changes to fatal diseases such as oral cancer. The paper presents a secondary analysis of the National Adult Dental Health Survey (2009). The analysis used descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and logistic regression models to report the self-reported oral health status and dental attendance of smokers and non-smokers in England. Of the 9,657 participants, 21% reported they were currently smoking. When compared with smokers; non-smokers were more likely to report 'good oral health' (75% versus 57% respectively, p<0.05). Smokers were twice as likely to attend the dentist symptomatically (OR = 2.27, CI = 2.02-2.55) compared with non-smoker regardless the deprivation status. Smokers were more likely to attend symptomatically in the most deprived quintiles (OR = 1.99, CI = 1.57-2.52) and perceive they had poorer oral health (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.42-2.20). The present research is consistent with earlier sub-national research and should be considered when planning early diagnosis and management strategies for smoking-related conditions, considering the potential impact dental teams might have on smoking rates.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4749304?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julia Csikar
Jing Kang
Ceri Wyborn
Tom A Dyer
Zoe Marshman
Jenny Godson
spellingShingle Julia Csikar
Jing Kang
Ceri Wyborn
Tom A Dyer
Zoe Marshman
Jenny Godson
The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Julia Csikar
Jing Kang
Ceri Wyborn
Tom A Dyer
Zoe Marshman
Jenny Godson
author_sort Julia Csikar
title The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.
title_short The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.
title_full The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.
title_fullStr The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.
title_full_unstemmed The Self-Reported Oral Health Status and Dental Attendance of Smokers and Non-Smokers in England.
title_sort self-reported oral health status and dental attendance of smokers and non-smokers in england.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Smoking has been identified as the second greatest risk factor for global death and disability and has impacts on the oral cavity from aesthetic changes to fatal diseases such as oral cancer. The paper presents a secondary analysis of the National Adult Dental Health Survey (2009). The analysis used descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and logistic regression models to report the self-reported oral health status and dental attendance of smokers and non-smokers in England. Of the 9,657 participants, 21% reported they were currently smoking. When compared with smokers; non-smokers were more likely to report 'good oral health' (75% versus 57% respectively, p<0.05). Smokers were twice as likely to attend the dentist symptomatically (OR = 2.27, CI = 2.02-2.55) compared with non-smoker regardless the deprivation status. Smokers were more likely to attend symptomatically in the most deprived quintiles (OR = 1.99, CI = 1.57-2.52) and perceive they had poorer oral health (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.42-2.20). The present research is consistent with earlier sub-national research and should be considered when planning early diagnosis and management strategies for smoking-related conditions, considering the potential impact dental teams might have on smoking rates.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4749304?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT juliacsikar theselfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT jingkang theselfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT ceriwyborn theselfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT tomadyer theselfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT zoemarshman theselfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT jennygodson theselfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT juliacsikar selfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT jingkang selfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT ceriwyborn selfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT tomadyer selfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT zoemarshman selfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
AT jennygodson selfreportedoralhealthstatusanddentalattendanceofsmokersandnonsmokersinengland
_version_ 1724764737443463168