Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.

Twenty women from Christchurch, New Zealand and sixteen from Columbus Ohio (dialect region U.S. Midland) participated in a bimodal lexical naming task where they repeated monosyllabic words after four speakers from four regional dialects: New Zealand, Australia, U.S. Inland North and U.S. Midland. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abby eWalker, Kathryn eCampbell-Kibler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546/full
id doaj-ab87b994cbf6435e9a91512324bfe392
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab87b994cbf6435e9a91512324bfe3922020-11-24T22:35:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-05-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.0054652064Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.Abby eWalker0Kathryn eCampbell-Kibler1Virginia TechThe Ohio State UniversityTwenty women from Christchurch, New Zealand and sixteen from Columbus Ohio (dialect region U.S. Midland) participated in a bimodal lexical naming task where they repeated monosyllabic words after four speakers from four regional dialects: New Zealand, Australia, U.S. Inland North and U.S. Midland. The resulting utterances were acoustically analyzed, and presented to listeners on Amazon Mechanical Turk in an AXB task. Convergence is observed, but differs depending on the dialect of the speaker, the dialect of the model, the particular word class being shadowed, and the order in which dialects are presented to participants. We argue that these patterns are generally consistent with findings that convergence is promoted by a large phonetic distance between shadower and model (Babel, 2010, contra Kim, Horton & Bradlow, 2011), and greater existing variability in a vowel class (Babel, 2012). The results also suggest that more comparisons of accommodation towards different dialects are warranted, and that the investigation of the socio-indexical meaning of specific linguistic forms in context is a promising avenue for understanding variable selectivity in convergence.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546/fullphonetic convergenceaccommodationsingle-word shadowingUS EnglishNew Zealand EnglishAXB task
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abby eWalker
Kathryn eCampbell-Kibler
spellingShingle Abby eWalker
Kathryn eCampbell-Kibler
Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.
Frontiers in Psychology
phonetic convergence
accommodation
single-word shadowing
US English
New Zealand English
AXB task
author_facet Abby eWalker
Kathryn eCampbell-Kibler
author_sort Abby eWalker
title Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.
title_short Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.
title_full Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.
title_fullStr Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.
title_full_unstemmed Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.
title_sort repeat what after whom? exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Twenty women from Christchurch, New Zealand and sixteen from Columbus Ohio (dialect region U.S. Midland) participated in a bimodal lexical naming task where they repeated monosyllabic words after four speakers from four regional dialects: New Zealand, Australia, U.S. Inland North and U.S. Midland. The resulting utterances were acoustically analyzed, and presented to listeners on Amazon Mechanical Turk in an AXB task. Convergence is observed, but differs depending on the dialect of the speaker, the dialect of the model, the particular word class being shadowed, and the order in which dialects are presented to participants. We argue that these patterns are generally consistent with findings that convergence is promoted by a large phonetic distance between shadower and model (Babel, 2010, contra Kim, Horton & Bradlow, 2011), and greater existing variability in a vowel class (Babel, 2012). The results also suggest that more comparisons of accommodation towards different dialects are warranted, and that the investigation of the socio-indexical meaning of specific linguistic forms in context is a promising avenue for understanding variable selectivity in convergence.
topic phonetic convergence
accommodation
single-word shadowing
US English
New Zealand English
AXB task
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546/full
work_keys_str_mv AT abbyewalker repeatwhatafterwhomexploringvariableselectivityinacrossdialectalshadowingtask
AT kathrynecampbellkibler repeatwhatafterwhomexploringvariableselectivityinacrossdialectalshadowingtask
_version_ 1725725263634890752