Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press
The standard works on the origins of the historical preservation movement in the United States are Hosmer's two volumes (1965, 1981) . West takes a slightly different approach in this work, using the development of four specific house museums (Mount Vemon, th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
1999-11-01
|
Series: | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
Online Access: | http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/275 |
id |
doaj-ab86efbed86345ada903ebbe30504b6e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ab86efbed86345ada903ebbe30504b6e2020-11-24T21:32:10ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology1062-47402047-69301999-11-0192242610.5334/bha.09205273Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution PressDavid L. Browman0Washington University - St. LouisThe standard works on the origins of the historical preservation movement in the United States are Hosmer's two volumes (1965, 1981) . West takes a slightly different approach in this work, using the development of four specific house museums (Mount Vemon, the Orchard House of Louisa May A1con, Monticello, and the Booker T. Washington National Monument) as foils to by which to develop more of the social context of the respective periods of formation, and the political institutions involved. She argues (p. xii) that "house museums are products as well as purveyors of his tory", that "house museums are and always have been about politics" and that as scholars we must understand that actual histories of house museums have often been superseded by "creation myths" which have evolved associated with the museums as part of the cultural politics of the context of their formation. This has clear implications for the history of archaeology, not only in terms of the context and worldview of the 1 9th century development of museum theory, but also in terns of the use of archaeology in the 20th century as part of the myth building process. The 180 pages of text developing this theme are well-documented by 70 pages of supporting notes.http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/275 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David L. Browman |
spellingShingle |
David L. Browman Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
author_facet |
David L. Browman |
author_sort |
David L. Browman |
title |
Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums,
Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press |
title_short |
Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums,
Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press |
title_full |
Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums,
Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press |
title_fullStr |
Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums,
Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press |
title_full_unstemmed |
Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums,
Patricia West. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press |
title_sort |
domesticating history: the political origins ofamericas house museums,
patricia west. washington d.c.: smithsonian institution press |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
issn |
1062-4740 2047-6930 |
publishDate |
1999-11-01 |
description |
The standard works on the origins of the historical preservation
movement in the United States are Hosmer's two volumes (1965, 1981) . West takes a
slightly different approach in this work, using the development of four specific house
museums (Mount Vemon, the Orchard House of Louisa May A1con, Monticello, and the Booker
T. Washington National Monument) as foils to by which to develop more of the social
context of the respective periods of formation, and the political institutions
involved. She argues (p. xii) that "house museums are products as well as purveyors of
his tory", that "house museums are and always have been about politics" and that as
scholars we must understand that actual histories of house museums have often been
superseded by "creation myths" which have evolved associated with the museums as part of
the cultural politics of the context of their formation. This has clear implications for
the history of archaeology, not only in terms of the context and worldview of the 1 9th
century development of museum theory, but also in terns of the use of archaeology in the
20th century as part of the myth building process. The 180 pages of text developing this
theme are well-documented by 70 pages of supporting notes. |
url |
http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/275 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidlbrowman domesticatinghistorythepoliticaloriginsofamericashousemuseumspatriciawestwashingtondcsmithsonianinstitutionpress |
_version_ |
1725958375115587584 |