Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press

The standard works on the origins of the historical preservation movement in the United States are Hosmer's two volumes (1965, 1981) . West takes a slightly different approach in this work, using the development of four specific house museums (Mount Vemon, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David L. Browman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 1999-11-01
Series:Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
Online Access:http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/275
id doaj-ab86efbed86345ada903ebbe30504b6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab86efbed86345ada903ebbe30504b6e2020-11-24T21:32:10ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology1062-47402047-69301999-11-0192242610.5334/bha.09205273Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution PressDavid L. Browman0Washington University - St. LouisThe standard works on the origins of the historical preservation movement in the United States are Hosmer's two volumes (1965, 1981) . West takes a slightly different approach in this work, using the development of four specific house museums (Mount Vemon, the Orchard House of Louisa May A1con, Monticello, and the Booker T. Washington National Monument) as foils to by which to develop more of the social context of the respective periods of formation, and the political institu­tions involved. She argues (p. xii) that "house museums are products as well as purveyors of his­ tory", that "house museums are and always have been about politics" and that as scholars we must understand that actual histories of house museums have often been superseded by "creation myths" which have evolved associated with the museums as part of the cultural politics of the context of their formation. This has clear implications for the history of archaeology, not only in terms of the context and worldview of the 1 9th century development of museum theory, but also in terns of the use of archaeology in the 20th century as part of the myth building process. The 180 pages of text developing this theme are well-documented by 70 pages of supporting notes.http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/275
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David L. Browman
spellingShingle David L. Browman
Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
author_facet David L. Browman
author_sort David L. Browman
title Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press
title_short Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press
title_full Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press
title_fullStr Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press
title_full_unstemmed Domesticating History: The Political Origins ofAmericas House Museums, Patricia West. Washing­ton D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press
title_sort domesticating history: the political origins ofamericas house museums, patricia west. washing­ton d.c.: smithsonian institution press
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
issn 1062-4740
2047-6930
publishDate 1999-11-01
description The standard works on the origins of the historical preservation movement in the United States are Hosmer's two volumes (1965, 1981) . West takes a slightly different approach in this work, using the development of four specific house museums (Mount Vemon, the Orchard House of Louisa May A1con, Monticello, and the Booker T. Washington National Monument) as foils to by which to develop more of the social context of the respective periods of formation, and the political institu­tions involved. She argues (p. xii) that "house museums are products as well as purveyors of his­ tory", that "house museums are and always have been about politics" and that as scholars we must understand that actual histories of house museums have often been superseded by "creation myths" which have evolved associated with the museums as part of the cultural politics of the context of their formation. This has clear implications for the history of archaeology, not only in terms of the context and worldview of the 1 9th century development of museum theory, but also in terns of the use of archaeology in the 20th century as part of the myth building process. The 180 pages of text developing this theme are well-documented by 70 pages of supporting notes.
url http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/275
work_keys_str_mv AT davidlbrowman domesticatinghistorythepoliticaloriginsofamericashousemuseumspatriciawestwashingtondcsmithsonianinstitutionpress
_version_ 1725958375115587584