INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITY

This paper deals with the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Claims in the Brazilian order and the Group Litigation Order (GLO) in the British order as mechanisms for collective redress. Although the inspiration for the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Claims was the German Musterverfahren, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Larissa Clare Pochmann da Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 2020-09-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/47745/33454
id doaj-ab7b5250dba14eb9a03db2767df596e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab7b5250dba14eb9a03db2767df596e52021-08-26T04:54:39ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362020-09-01212232251https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2020.47745INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITYLarissa Clare Pochmann da Silva0Universidade Candido Mendes (UCAM), Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA)This paper deals with the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Claims in the Brazilian order and the Group Litigation Order (GLO) in the British order as mechanisms for collective redress. Although the inspiration for the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Claims was the German Musterverfahren, the analysis of the context in which the Brazilian and British instruments were created, as well as the admissibility requirements of each instrument, can contribute to improve collective redress.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/47745/33454collective redressincident of resolution of repetitive claimsgroup litigation order
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Larissa Clare Pochmann da Silva
spellingShingle Larissa Clare Pochmann da Silva
INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITY
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
collective redress
incident of resolution of repetitive claims
group litigation order
author_facet Larissa Clare Pochmann da Silva
author_sort Larissa Clare Pochmann da Silva
title INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITY
title_short INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITY
title_full INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITY
title_fullStr INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITY
title_full_unstemmed INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE CLAIMS AND GROUP LITIGATION ORDER: HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF ADMISSIBILITY
title_sort incident of resolution of repetitive claims and group litigation order: historical considerations and requirements of admissibility
publisher Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
series Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
issn 1982-7636
publishDate 2020-09-01
description This paper deals with the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Claims in the Brazilian order and the Group Litigation Order (GLO) in the British order as mechanisms for collective redress. Although the inspiration for the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Claims was the German Musterverfahren, the analysis of the context in which the Brazilian and British instruments were created, as well as the admissibility requirements of each instrument, can contribute to improve collective redress.
topic collective redress
incident of resolution of repetitive claims
group litigation order
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/47745/33454
work_keys_str_mv AT larissaclarepochmanndasilva incidentofresolutionofrepetitiveclaimsandgrouplitigationorderhistoricalconsiderationsandrequirementsofadmissibility
_version_ 1721196027230289920