DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY

Purpose: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of A-PRF alone or in combination with freeze-dried bone allograft in improving vital bone formation and decreasing alveolar bone resorption. Materials and methods: The study included 60 patients with 63 post-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vasilena Ivanova, Ivan Chenchev, Stefan Zlatev, Nikolay Kanazirski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peytchinski Publishing 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of IMAB
Subjects:
prf
Online Access:https://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issues-2019/issue4/JofIMAB-2019-25-4p2853-2861.pdf
id doaj-ab6c943d41514a49a19e0faf530c7f22
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab6c943d41514a49a19e0faf530c7f222020-11-25T00:12:54ZengPeytchinski PublishingJournal of IMAB1312-773X2019-12-012542853286110.5272/jimab.2019254.2853DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDYVasilena Ivanova0Ivan Chenchev1Stefan Zlatev2Nikolay Kanazirski3Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.Department of Prosthetic dental medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.Purpose: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of A-PRF alone or in combination with freeze-dried bone allograft in improving vital bone formation and decreasing alveolar bone resorption. Materials and methods: The study included 60 patients with 63 post-extraction sockets. They were divided into three groups – socket preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft (BoneAlbumin™, OrthoSera Dental, Gyor, Hungary), which consisted of 28 patients. The second group presented post-extraction sockets filled with PRF as a sole grafting material – 23 patients and the third group was the control group - 12 patients. Two scans with Trios intraoral scanner were performed on each patient – one during the socket preservation procedure and one 4 months after. The changes of alveolar height and width were assessed on the superimposed virtual models obtained from the intraoral scanner. Bone biopsy was harvested from the preserved area with a trephine drill 4 months after the extraction. Results: Results reveal that vertical and horizontal bone resorption were less pronounced in both of the tested groups as opposed in the control group, where these values were significantly higher. There was a significant difference between the quantity of the newly formed bone in the control group and both of the tested groups – PRF and allograft. Conclusions: The study reveals that A-PRF as a sole grafting material or FDBA in combination with PRF membrane are both suitable for ridge preservation procedures. The study demonstrates a novel in vivo method for measuring bone resorption after ridge augmentation procedures.https://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issues-2019/issue4/JofIMAB-2019-25-4p2853-2861.pdfsocket preservationdental implantsallograftprftrios intraoral scannercad/cam
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vasilena Ivanova
Ivan Chenchev
Stefan Zlatev
Nikolay Kanazirski
spellingShingle Vasilena Ivanova
Ivan Chenchev
Stefan Zlatev
Nikolay Kanazirski
DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
Journal of IMAB
socket preservation
dental implants
allograft
prf
trios intraoral scanner
cad/cam
author_facet Vasilena Ivanova
Ivan Chenchev
Stefan Zlatev
Nikolay Kanazirski
author_sort Vasilena Ivanova
title DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
title_short DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
title_full DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
title_fullStr DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
title_full_unstemmed DIMENSIONAL RIDGE ALTERATIONS AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOLLOWING SOCKET PRESERVATION WITH PRF OR ALLOGRAFT. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
title_sort dimensional ridge alterations and histomorphometric analysis following socket preservation with prf or allograft. randomized controlled clinical study
publisher Peytchinski Publishing
series Journal of IMAB
issn 1312-773X
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Purpose: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of A-PRF alone or in combination with freeze-dried bone allograft in improving vital bone formation and decreasing alveolar bone resorption. Materials and methods: The study included 60 patients with 63 post-extraction sockets. They were divided into three groups – socket preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft (BoneAlbumin™, OrthoSera Dental, Gyor, Hungary), which consisted of 28 patients. The second group presented post-extraction sockets filled with PRF as a sole grafting material – 23 patients and the third group was the control group - 12 patients. Two scans with Trios intraoral scanner were performed on each patient – one during the socket preservation procedure and one 4 months after. The changes of alveolar height and width were assessed on the superimposed virtual models obtained from the intraoral scanner. Bone biopsy was harvested from the preserved area with a trephine drill 4 months after the extraction. Results: Results reveal that vertical and horizontal bone resorption were less pronounced in both of the tested groups as opposed in the control group, where these values were significantly higher. There was a significant difference between the quantity of the newly formed bone in the control group and both of the tested groups – PRF and allograft. Conclusions: The study reveals that A-PRF as a sole grafting material or FDBA in combination with PRF membrane are both suitable for ridge preservation procedures. The study demonstrates a novel in vivo method for measuring bone resorption after ridge augmentation procedures.
topic socket preservation
dental implants
allograft
prf
trios intraoral scanner
cad/cam
url https://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issues-2019/issue4/JofIMAB-2019-25-4p2853-2861.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vasilenaivanova dimensionalridgealterationsandhistomorphometricanalysisfollowingsocketpreservationwithprforallograftrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudy
AT ivanchenchev dimensionalridgealterationsandhistomorphometricanalysisfollowingsocketpreservationwithprforallograftrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudy
AT stefanzlatev dimensionalridgealterationsandhistomorphometricanalysisfollowingsocketpreservationwithprforallograftrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudy
AT nikolaykanazirski dimensionalridgealterationsandhistomorphometricanalysisfollowingsocketpreservationwithprforallograftrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudy
_version_ 1725396875142496256