Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
Leaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3250490?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-ab59e233d0344aa3aac80f2cb15e1be1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ab59e233d0344aa3aac80f2cb15e1be12020-11-25T02:00:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e2970410.1371/journal.pone.0029704Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.Hongfei LuWu JiangM GhiassiSean LeeMantri NitinLeaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia to assess the effectiveness of several supervised pattern recognition techniques for classifications and compare their accuracy. Clustering approach, Learning Vector Quantization neural network (LVQ-ANN), Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks (DAN2), and C-support vector machines (SVM) are used to discriminate 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia (11 in sect. Furfuracea, 16 in sect. Paracamellia, 12 in sect. Tuberculata, 34 in sect. Camellia, and 20 in sect. Theopsis). DAN2 and SVM show excellent classification results for genus Camellia with DAN2's accuracy of 97.92% and 91.11% for training and testing data sets respectively. The RBF-SVM results of 97.92% and 97.78% for training and testing offer the best classification accuracy. A hierarchical dendrogram based on leaf architecture data has confirmed the morphological classification of the five sections as previously proposed. The overall results suggest that leaf architecture-based data analysis using supervised pattern recognition techniques, especially DAN2 and SVM discrimination methods, is excellent for identification of Camellia species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3250490?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hongfei Lu Wu Jiang M Ghiassi Sean Lee Mantri Nitin |
spellingShingle |
Hongfei Lu Wu Jiang M Ghiassi Sean Lee Mantri Nitin Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Hongfei Lu Wu Jiang M Ghiassi Sean Lee Mantri Nitin |
author_sort |
Hongfei Lu |
title |
Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques. |
title_short |
Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques. |
title_full |
Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques. |
title_fullStr |
Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques. |
title_sort |
classification of camellia (theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Leaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia to assess the effectiveness of several supervised pattern recognition techniques for classifications and compare their accuracy. Clustering approach, Learning Vector Quantization neural network (LVQ-ANN), Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks (DAN2), and C-support vector machines (SVM) are used to discriminate 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia (11 in sect. Furfuracea, 16 in sect. Paracamellia, 12 in sect. Tuberculata, 34 in sect. Camellia, and 20 in sect. Theopsis). DAN2 and SVM show excellent classification results for genus Camellia with DAN2's accuracy of 97.92% and 91.11% for training and testing data sets respectively. The RBF-SVM results of 97.92% and 97.78% for training and testing offer the best classification accuracy. A hierarchical dendrogram based on leaf architecture data has confirmed the morphological classification of the five sections as previously proposed. The overall results suggest that leaf architecture-based data analysis using supervised pattern recognition techniques, especially DAN2 and SVM discrimination methods, is excellent for identification of Camellia species. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3250490?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hongfeilu classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques AT wujiang classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques AT mghiassi classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques AT seanlee classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques AT mantrinitin classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques |
_version_ |
1724961664826081280 |