Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.

Leaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hongfei Lu, Wu Jiang, M Ghiassi, Sean Lee, Mantri Nitin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3250490?pdf=render
id doaj-ab59e233d0344aa3aac80f2cb15e1be1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab59e233d0344aa3aac80f2cb15e1be12020-11-25T02:00:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e2970410.1371/journal.pone.0029704Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.Hongfei LuWu JiangM GhiassiSean LeeMantri NitinLeaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia to assess the effectiveness of several supervised pattern recognition techniques for classifications and compare their accuracy. Clustering approach, Learning Vector Quantization neural network (LVQ-ANN), Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks (DAN2), and C-support vector machines (SVM) are used to discriminate 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia (11 in sect. Furfuracea, 16 in sect. Paracamellia, 12 in sect. Tuberculata, 34 in sect. Camellia, and 20 in sect. Theopsis). DAN2 and SVM show excellent classification results for genus Camellia with DAN2's accuracy of 97.92% and 91.11% for training and testing data sets respectively. The RBF-SVM results of 97.92% and 97.78% for training and testing offer the best classification accuracy. A hierarchical dendrogram based on leaf architecture data has confirmed the morphological classification of the five sections as previously proposed. The overall results suggest that leaf architecture-based data analysis using supervised pattern recognition techniques, especially DAN2 and SVM discrimination methods, is excellent for identification of Camellia species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3250490?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hongfei Lu
Wu Jiang
M Ghiassi
Sean Lee
Mantri Nitin
spellingShingle Hongfei Lu
Wu Jiang
M Ghiassi
Sean Lee
Mantri Nitin
Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hongfei Lu
Wu Jiang
M Ghiassi
Sean Lee
Mantri Nitin
author_sort Hongfei Lu
title Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
title_short Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
title_full Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
title_fullStr Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
title_sort classification of camellia (theaceae) species using leaf architecture variations and pattern recognition techniques.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Leaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia to assess the effectiveness of several supervised pattern recognition techniques for classifications and compare their accuracy. Clustering approach, Learning Vector Quantization neural network (LVQ-ANN), Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks (DAN2), and C-support vector machines (SVM) are used to discriminate 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia (11 in sect. Furfuracea, 16 in sect. Paracamellia, 12 in sect. Tuberculata, 34 in sect. Camellia, and 20 in sect. Theopsis). DAN2 and SVM show excellent classification results for genus Camellia with DAN2's accuracy of 97.92% and 91.11% for training and testing data sets respectively. The RBF-SVM results of 97.92% and 97.78% for training and testing offer the best classification accuracy. A hierarchical dendrogram based on leaf architecture data has confirmed the morphological classification of the five sections as previously proposed. The overall results suggest that leaf architecture-based data analysis using supervised pattern recognition techniques, especially DAN2 and SVM discrimination methods, is excellent for identification of Camellia species.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3250490?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hongfeilu classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques
AT wujiang classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques
AT mghiassi classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques
AT seanlee classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques
AT mantrinitin classificationofcamelliatheaceaespeciesusingleafarchitecturevariationsandpatternrecognitiontechniques
_version_ 1724961664826081280