Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)

The evaluation of grinding aid (GA) effect on clinker processing in laboratory grinding mills is relatively simple. Yet, the results obtained cannot be directly transposed to industrial mills, given the fundamentally different operational modes and grinding parameters. This paper seeks to evaluate t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joseph Jean Assaad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/938176
id doaj-ab57eb6bc1dd42739f8aafce6c6f4532
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab57eb6bc1dd42739f8aafce6c6f45322020-11-24T22:53:34ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84341687-84422015-01-01201510.1155/2015/938176938176Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)Joseph Jean Assaad0Holderchem Building Chemicals, P.O. Box 40206, Baabda, LebanonThe evaluation of grinding aid (GA) effect on clinker processing in laboratory grinding mills is relatively simple. Yet, the results obtained cannot be directly transposed to industrial mills, given the fundamentally different operational modes and grinding parameters. This paper seeks to evaluate the scale effect by comparing the results obtained from a closed-circuit tube mill operating at 90 ton/hr to those determined using a 50-liter laboratory mill. Tests results have shown that the decrease in specific energy consumption (Ec) due to glycol or amine-based GA can be evaluated under laboratory conditions. However, such tests underestimate the actual performance that could be achieved in real-scale mills; the Ec reduction due to GA is around twofold higher when grinding is performed in real-scale mill. Compared to industrial tests, the cement particle size distribution curves widened and shifted towards higher diameters when grinding was performed under laboratory conditions, particularly with GA additions. This led to remarkable changes in water demand, setting time, and 1- and 28-day compressive strengths.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/938176
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joseph Jean Assaad
spellingShingle Joseph Jean Assaad
Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
author_facet Joseph Jean Assaad
author_sort Joseph Jean Assaad
title Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)
title_short Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)
title_full Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)
title_fullStr Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)
title_full_unstemmed Industrial versus Laboratory Clinker Processing Using Grinding Aids (Scale Effect)
title_sort industrial versus laboratory clinker processing using grinding aids (scale effect)
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
issn 1687-8434
1687-8442
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The evaluation of grinding aid (GA) effect on clinker processing in laboratory grinding mills is relatively simple. Yet, the results obtained cannot be directly transposed to industrial mills, given the fundamentally different operational modes and grinding parameters. This paper seeks to evaluate the scale effect by comparing the results obtained from a closed-circuit tube mill operating at 90 ton/hr to those determined using a 50-liter laboratory mill. Tests results have shown that the decrease in specific energy consumption (Ec) due to glycol or amine-based GA can be evaluated under laboratory conditions. However, such tests underestimate the actual performance that could be achieved in real-scale mills; the Ec reduction due to GA is around twofold higher when grinding is performed in real-scale mill. Compared to industrial tests, the cement particle size distribution curves widened and shifted towards higher diameters when grinding was performed under laboratory conditions, particularly with GA additions. This led to remarkable changes in water demand, setting time, and 1- and 28-day compressive strengths.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/938176
work_keys_str_mv AT josephjeanassaad industrialversuslaboratoryclinkerprocessingusinggrindingaidsscaleeffect
_version_ 1725662872387715072