Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer

Objective: To evaluate the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: A total of 68 patients with advanced esophageal cancer who were treated in our hospital between August 2013 and March 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun-Ying Liang1, Mao-Nan Yang2
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editorial Board of Journal of Hainan Medical University 2017-04-01
Series:Journal of Hainan Medical University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.hnykdxxb.com/PDF/201708/27.pdf
id doaj-ab44dc86a31d4c6cbd563bd42aa621f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab44dc86a31d4c6cbd563bd42aa621f82020-11-24T23:19:50ZengEditorial Board of Journal of Hainan Medical UniversityJournal of Hainan Medical University1007-12371007-12372017-04-01238114117Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancerJun-Ying Liang10Mao-Nan Yang211. Pharmacy Department, Hospital of Traditional Medicine of Leshan Sichuan, Leshan City, Sichuan Province, 6140002. Oncology Department, Hospital of Traditional Medicine of Leshan Sichuan, Leshan City, Sichuan Province, 614000Objective: To evaluate the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: A total of 68 patients with advanced esophageal cancer who were treated in our hospital between August 2013 and March 2016 were collected and divided into the paclitaxel liposome group (n=34) who received nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome therapy and the paclitaxel group (n=34) who received nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel therapy according to the double-blind randomized control method, and both therapies lasted for 8 weeks. Before treatment and after 8 weeks of treatment, RIA method was used to determine serum esophageal cancer-related tumor marker levels, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine serum angiogenesis index levels, and flow cytometry was used to measure cellular immunity indexes. Results: Before treatment, the differences in serum tumor marker and angiogenesis index levels as well as cellular immune function indexes were not statistically significant between the two groups. After 8 weeks of treatment, serum tumor markers CY211, CEA, SCC, CA724 and CA125 levels of observation group were lower than those of control group, angiogenesis indexes HIF-α, VEGF and MMP-9 levels were lower than those of control group, and peripheral blood cellular immunity indexes CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels were higher than those of control group while CD8+ level was lower than that of control group. Conclusion: Nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome can more effectively reduce the tumor load, causes less adverse effects, and has good curative effect and security.http://www.hnykdxxb.com/PDF/201708/27.pdfAdvanced esophageal cancer Paclitaxel liposome Paclitaxel Tumor load Adverse effects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jun-Ying Liang1
Mao-Nan Yang2
spellingShingle Jun-Ying Liang1
Mao-Nan Yang2
Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
Journal of Hainan Medical University
Advanced esophageal cancer Paclitaxel liposome Paclitaxel Tumor load Adverse effects
author_facet Jun-Ying Liang1
Mao-Nan Yang2
author_sort Jun-Ying Liang1
title Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
title_short Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
title_full Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
title_sort evaluation of the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
publisher Editorial Board of Journal of Hainan Medical University
series Journal of Hainan Medical University
issn 1007-1237
1007-1237
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Objective: To evaluate the tumor load and adverse reactions of nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome and with paclitaxel treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: A total of 68 patients with advanced esophageal cancer who were treated in our hospital between August 2013 and March 2016 were collected and divided into the paclitaxel liposome group (n=34) who received nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome therapy and the paclitaxel group (n=34) who received nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel therapy according to the double-blind randomized control method, and both therapies lasted for 8 weeks. Before treatment and after 8 weeks of treatment, RIA method was used to determine serum esophageal cancer-related tumor marker levels, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine serum angiogenesis index levels, and flow cytometry was used to measure cellular immunity indexes. Results: Before treatment, the differences in serum tumor marker and angiogenesis index levels as well as cellular immune function indexes were not statistically significant between the two groups. After 8 weeks of treatment, serum tumor markers CY211, CEA, SCC, CA724 and CA125 levels of observation group were lower than those of control group, angiogenesis indexes HIF-α, VEGF and MMP-9 levels were lower than those of control group, and peripheral blood cellular immunity indexes CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels were higher than those of control group while CD8+ level was lower than that of control group. Conclusion: Nedaplatin combined with paclitaxel liposome can more effectively reduce the tumor load, causes less adverse effects, and has good curative effect and security.
topic Advanced esophageal cancer Paclitaxel liposome Paclitaxel Tumor load Adverse effects
url http://www.hnykdxxb.com/PDF/201708/27.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT junyingliang1 evaluationofthetumorloadandadversereactionsofnedaplatincombinedwithpaclitaxelliposomeandwithpaclitaxeltreatmentofadvancedesophagealcancer
AT maonanyang2 evaluationofthetumorloadandadversereactionsofnedaplatincombinedwithpaclitaxelliposomeandwithpaclitaxeltreatmentofadvancedesophagealcancer
_version_ 1725576596088160256