THE MILITARY-GEOGRAPHICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUWAŁKI GAP
Dynamic changes in the security environment are forcing us to reflect on the shape of the international order at the end of the second decade of the 21st century. The aggressive policy of the Russian Federation, which is confirmed by the conflict with Georgia in 2008 and the current situation in Ukr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wydawnictwo Akademii Sztuki Wojennej
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Security and Defence Quarterly |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.journalssystem.com/sdq/THE-MILITARY-GEOGRAPHICAL-SIGNIFICANCE-nOF-THE-SUWALKI-GAP,103175,0,2.html |
Summary: | Dynamic changes in the security environment are forcing us to reflect on the shape of the
international order at the end of the second decade of the 21st century. The aggressive
policy of the Russian Federation, which is confirmed by the conflict with Georgia in 2008
and the current situation in Ukraine, indicates that the use of military violence in the
resolution of international disputes is not a historical category at all. This is of particular
importance to the geopolitical location of the Republic of Poland. The length of our land
border with the Russian Federation is 210 km, while with Belarus it is 418 km. The above
fact has a fundamental impact not only on the public debate on the security of our country
and the region, but also, and perhaps most importantly, on the shape of defence policy
and the content of planning possible measures to prevent and counteract the escalation
of prospective tensions in NATO-Russia relations. Both Russian military doctrine and
the opinions expressed by politicians and specialists dealing with military issues and
political and military experts indicate that, from the Russian perspective, the Baltic
States’ membership of the North Atlantic Alliance and the presence of NATO troops on
the territory of these countries, is highly unfavourable. Therefore, there are grounds to
believe that countries such as Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, are treated by Russia as
natural bridgeheads, convenient for bringing possible strikes against Russia. Therefore, it
is possible that blocking communication routes leading to these countries, while cutting
them off from the support of allied land forces, may prove to be a key success factor in the
situation of a hypothetical armed conflict, aimed not only at depriving these countries of
their sovereignty, but also aimed at discrediting the power of the Alliance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2300-8741 2544-994X |