Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical Study

Purpose. To evaluate host-implant integration with collagen membranes in 14 patients who underwent limb salvage surgery for musculoskeletal oncological disease. Methods. 8 females and 6 males aged 10 to 69 (mean, 30) years underwent limb savage surgery with collagen membranes (Tutomesh; Tutogen Medi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saminathan Suresh Nathan, Edwin Ravanzo Guerzon, Kishore Bhavanam, Lay Hong Tan, Khin Zarchi, Barry P Pereira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900205
id doaj-ab1fddf3de1f4ee69bb3bc96a747b4b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab1fddf3de1f4ee69bb3bc96a747b4b42020-11-25T03:40:30ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902011-08-011910.1177/230949901101900205Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical StudySaminathan Suresh NathanEdwin Ravanzo GuerzonKishore BhavanamLay Hong TanKhin ZarchiBarry P PereiraPurpose. To evaluate host-implant integration with collagen membranes in 14 patients who underwent limb salvage surgery for musculoskeletal oncological disease. Methods. 8 females and 6 males aged 10 to 69 (mean, 30) years underwent limb savage surgery with collagen membranes (Tutomesh; Tutogen Medical, Germany) for osteosarcoma (n=7), chondrosarcoma (n=3), giant cell tumour (n=1), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (n=1), arteriovenous malformation (n=1), and pigmented villonodular synovitis (n=1). The procedures performed were proximal humeral resection (n=3), partial scapulectomy (n=1), proximal femoral resection (n=2), total femoral resection (n=2), proximal tibial resection (n=3), and wide resection of soft tissues of the knee (n=3). In addition, 10 patients underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction. Reconstruction of musculoskeletal defects was classified into type I (intercalary, n=2), type II (joint, n=4), and type III (both, n=8). Graft incorporation and local recurrence were monitored. Clinical outcome measures entailed the Short Form-36, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS). Results. Two patients with proximal tibial resection and one with total femoral resection had wound healing problems. No patient had any infection or any foreign body reaction necessitating implant removal. Eight patients with type II or III reconstruction were followed up for a mean of 11 (range, 1–23) months. Their scores in the Short Form-36, TESS, and MSTS were similar to those who had undergone reconstructions without the membrane, with the exception of type II reconstructions for which the membrane conferred good results. Conclusion. The Tutomesh membrane facilitated host-implant integration and provided a feasible anatomic reconstruction for ligaments in the shoulder, knee, and hip.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900205
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saminathan Suresh Nathan
Edwin Ravanzo Guerzon
Kishore Bhavanam
Lay Hong Tan
Khin Zarchi
Barry P Pereira
spellingShingle Saminathan Suresh Nathan
Edwin Ravanzo Guerzon
Kishore Bhavanam
Lay Hong Tan
Khin Zarchi
Barry P Pereira
Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical Study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Saminathan Suresh Nathan
Edwin Ravanzo Guerzon
Kishore Bhavanam
Lay Hong Tan
Khin Zarchi
Barry P Pereira
author_sort Saminathan Suresh Nathan
title Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical Study
title_short Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical Study
title_full Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical Study
title_fullStr Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Collagen Membranes for Host-Implant Integration: A Pilot Clinical Study
title_sort collagen membranes for host-implant integration: a pilot clinical study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2011-08-01
description Purpose. To evaluate host-implant integration with collagen membranes in 14 patients who underwent limb salvage surgery for musculoskeletal oncological disease. Methods. 8 females and 6 males aged 10 to 69 (mean, 30) years underwent limb savage surgery with collagen membranes (Tutomesh; Tutogen Medical, Germany) for osteosarcoma (n=7), chondrosarcoma (n=3), giant cell tumour (n=1), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (n=1), arteriovenous malformation (n=1), and pigmented villonodular synovitis (n=1). The procedures performed were proximal humeral resection (n=3), partial scapulectomy (n=1), proximal femoral resection (n=2), total femoral resection (n=2), proximal tibial resection (n=3), and wide resection of soft tissues of the knee (n=3). In addition, 10 patients underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction. Reconstruction of musculoskeletal defects was classified into type I (intercalary, n=2), type II (joint, n=4), and type III (both, n=8). Graft incorporation and local recurrence were monitored. Clinical outcome measures entailed the Short Form-36, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS). Results. Two patients with proximal tibial resection and one with total femoral resection had wound healing problems. No patient had any infection or any foreign body reaction necessitating implant removal. Eight patients with type II or III reconstruction were followed up for a mean of 11 (range, 1–23) months. Their scores in the Short Form-36, TESS, and MSTS were similar to those who had undergone reconstructions without the membrane, with the exception of type II reconstructions for which the membrane conferred good results. Conclusion. The Tutomesh membrane facilitated host-implant integration and provided a feasible anatomic reconstruction for ligaments in the shoulder, knee, and hip.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900205
work_keys_str_mv AT saminathansureshnathan collagenmembranesforhostimplantintegrationapilotclinicalstudy
AT edwinravanzoguerzon collagenmembranesforhostimplantintegrationapilotclinicalstudy
AT kishorebhavanam collagenmembranesforhostimplantintegrationapilotclinicalstudy
AT layhongtan collagenmembranesforhostimplantintegrationapilotclinicalstudy
AT khinzarchi collagenmembranesforhostimplantintegrationapilotclinicalstudy
AT barryppereira collagenmembranesforhostimplantintegrationapilotclinicalstudy
_version_ 1724534383484862464