Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]

In order to verify the precision of the results obtained for atmospheric deposition and the comparability of the results, 10 precipitation samples collected in Romania, in open field and under the wood canopy were analysed in 3 chemistry laboratories: ICAS Station Campulung Moldovenesc Romania...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iacoban C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ”Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Forestry and “Marin Drăcea” National Research-Development Institute in Forestry - Station Câmpulung Moldovenesc 2000-12-01
Series:Bucovina Forestieră
Online Access:http://www.bucovina-forestiera.ro/arhiva/2000/8(2)/comparabilitatea-rezultatelor-obtinute-la-analiza-unor-parametri-ai-apelor-de-precipitatii.pdf
id doaj-ab144c19798f4b81b8cc53446c80c953
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab144c19798f4b81b8cc53446c80c9532020-11-25T03:38:32Zeng ”Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Forestry and “Marin Drăcea” National Research-Development Institute in Forestry - Station Câmpulung MoldovenescBucovina Forestieră1582-07691582-37252000-12-0182003014Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]Iacoban C0Staţiunea Experimentala de Cultura Molidului Câmpulung Moldovenesc, Calea Bucovinei 73 bis, 5950 Câmpulung Moldovenesc, jud. Suceava.In order to verify the precision of the results obtained for atmospheric deposition and the comparability of the results, 10 precipitation samples collected in Romania, in open field and under the wood canopy were analysed in 3 chemistry laboratories: ICAS Station Campulung Moldovenesc Romania, INRA and CNRS Nancy France. The analytical methods used were different or the same in the 3 laboratories. The concentrations of seven ions were determined: Cl-, NO3 -, SO4 2-, K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+. The results obtained reveale significant differences between concentrations of the same ion analyzed in samples collected with different types of collectors, in the same place at the same moment. These differences were significant in each of the 3 laboratories which performed the analysis. The best results for the intercomparison exercise were obtained for the concentration of K+, for which the deviation between measurements in the 3 laboratories did not exceed 15 %. The concentration of Na+ was sistematic underestimated by ICP spectrometry in INRA laboratory comparative with the results obtained by AAS or AES spectrometry in ICAS or CNRS laboratories. The best correlation was that between the concentrations determined by AAS at ICAS and those determined by AES at CNRS. For the concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+, the correlations obtained between the results of the 3 laboratories were good, but high deviations, as normal, were obtained for values close to the detection limits. The concentrations of SO4 2- determined by spectrophotometry at ICAS were well correlated with those obtained by ion chromatography at CNRS. The results obtained by ICP spectrometry at INRA and CNRS were sistematic higher because this method allows the determination of the total sulphur in preciptation samples, not only the SO4 2-. Deviations of the concentrations obtained by spectrofotometry at ICAS comparative with those determined by ion chromatography at CNRS were higher then 20 % at concentrations < 1 mgCl-/l. The tendency of underestimating the results in the ICAS laboratory is determined by the presence of the Cl- ion in the distiled water used to prepare the calibration curve. The sistematic high deviations obtained for the NO3 - ion can be explained by the high period of time between the determination in the 2 laboratories and the fact that the concentration of this ion vary in time. The intercomparison exercise to which the 3 laboratories participated allowed to verify some hypothesis concerning the results obtained in the ICAS laboratory and to compare the performances of the analytical methods used.http://www.bucovina-forestiera.ro/arhiva/2000/8(2)/comparabilitatea-rezultatelor-obtinute-la-analiza-unor-parametri-ai-apelor-de-precipitatii.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iacoban C
spellingShingle Iacoban C
Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]
Bucovina Forestieră
author_facet Iacoban C
author_sort Iacoban C
title Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]
title_short Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]
title_full Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]
title_fullStr Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]
title_full_unstemmed Comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [Comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]
title_sort comparabilitatea rezultatelor obţinute la analiza unor parametri ai apelor de precipitaţii [comparability of the results obtained analysing precipitation samples]
publisher ”Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Forestry and “Marin Drăcea” National Research-Development Institute in Forestry - Station Câmpulung Moldovenesc
series Bucovina Forestieră
issn 1582-0769
1582-3725
publishDate 2000-12-01
description In order to verify the precision of the results obtained for atmospheric deposition and the comparability of the results, 10 precipitation samples collected in Romania, in open field and under the wood canopy were analysed in 3 chemistry laboratories: ICAS Station Campulung Moldovenesc Romania, INRA and CNRS Nancy France. The analytical methods used were different or the same in the 3 laboratories. The concentrations of seven ions were determined: Cl-, NO3 -, SO4 2-, K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+. The results obtained reveale significant differences between concentrations of the same ion analyzed in samples collected with different types of collectors, in the same place at the same moment. These differences were significant in each of the 3 laboratories which performed the analysis. The best results for the intercomparison exercise were obtained for the concentration of K+, for which the deviation between measurements in the 3 laboratories did not exceed 15 %. The concentration of Na+ was sistematic underestimated by ICP spectrometry in INRA laboratory comparative with the results obtained by AAS or AES spectrometry in ICAS or CNRS laboratories. The best correlation was that between the concentrations determined by AAS at ICAS and those determined by AES at CNRS. For the concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+, the correlations obtained between the results of the 3 laboratories were good, but high deviations, as normal, were obtained for values close to the detection limits. The concentrations of SO4 2- determined by spectrophotometry at ICAS were well correlated with those obtained by ion chromatography at CNRS. The results obtained by ICP spectrometry at INRA and CNRS were sistematic higher because this method allows the determination of the total sulphur in preciptation samples, not only the SO4 2-. Deviations of the concentrations obtained by spectrofotometry at ICAS comparative with those determined by ion chromatography at CNRS were higher then 20 % at concentrations < 1 mgCl-/l. The tendency of underestimating the results in the ICAS laboratory is determined by the presence of the Cl- ion in the distiled water used to prepare the calibration curve. The sistematic high deviations obtained for the NO3 - ion can be explained by the high period of time between the determination in the 2 laboratories and the fact that the concentration of this ion vary in time. The intercomparison exercise to which the 3 laboratories participated allowed to verify some hypothesis concerning the results obtained in the ICAS laboratory and to compare the performances of the analytical methods used.
url http://www.bucovina-forestiera.ro/arhiva/2000/8(2)/comparabilitatea-rezultatelor-obtinute-la-analiza-unor-parametri-ai-apelor-de-precipitatii.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT iacobanc comparabilitatearezultatelorobtinutelaanalizaunorparametriaiapelordeprecipitatiicomparabilityoftheresultsobtainedanalysingprecipitationsamples
_version_ 1724541885665509376