Interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)

Participation in interlaboratory comparison and proficiency testing schemes is important for laboratories to control the work quality. In this study, a sample of naturally contaminated maize was analyzed for the content of ochratoxin A (OTA) in three laboratories in Serbia. Participating laborat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jakšić Sandra M., Jajić Igor M., Nešić Ksenija D., Stojanov Igor M., Živkov-Baloš Milica M., Mihaljev Željko A., Abramović Biljana F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Matica srpska 2013-01-01
Series:Zbornik Matice Srpske za Prirodne Nauke
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0352-4906/2013/0352-49061324077J.pdf
id doaj-ab13ce31db21458eb70b1ba24dc0527e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab13ce31db21458eb70b1ba24dc0527e2021-01-02T02:41:12ZengMatica srpskaZbornik Matice Srpske za Prirodne Nauke0352-49062013-01-012013124778410.2298/ZMSPN1324077JInterlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)Jakšić Sandra M.Jajić Igor M.Nešić Ksenija D.Stojanov Igor M.Živkov-Baloš Milica M.Mihaljev Željko A.Abramović Biljana F.Participation in interlaboratory comparison and proficiency testing schemes is important for laboratories to control the work quality. In this study, a sample of naturally contaminated maize was analyzed for the content of ochratoxin A (OTA) in three laboratories in Serbia. Participating laboratories used enzymatic immunoaffinity method (ELISA) for the determination of OTA and selection of the ELISA kit was free. Between-laboratory precision was acceptable as evidenced by Cochran’s C test. Moreover, z-scores for all three laboratories were z < ± 2, which is considered acceptable. Used OTA confirmation methods were thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), with fluorescence detector. The results of different methods were comparable. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. TR 031071 i br. OI 172042]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0352-4906/2013/0352-49061324077J.pdfconfirmation methodsELISAinterlaboratory comparisonmaizeochratoxin A
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jakšić Sandra M.
Jajić Igor M.
Nešić Ksenija D.
Stojanov Igor M.
Živkov-Baloš Milica M.
Mihaljev Željko A.
Abramović Biljana F.
spellingShingle Jakšić Sandra M.
Jajić Igor M.
Nešić Ksenija D.
Stojanov Igor M.
Živkov-Baloš Milica M.
Mihaljev Željko A.
Abramović Biljana F.
Interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)
Zbornik Matice Srpske za Prirodne Nauke
confirmation methods
ELISA
interlaboratory comparison
maize
ochratoxin A
author_facet Jakšić Sandra M.
Jajić Igor M.
Nešić Ksenija D.
Stojanov Igor M.
Živkov-Baloš Milica M.
Mihaljev Željko A.
Abramović Biljana F.
author_sort Jakšić Sandra M.
title Interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)
title_short Interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)
title_full Interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)
title_fullStr Interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)
title_full_unstemmed Interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin A by ELISA in maize (running title: Determination of ochratoxin A in maize)
title_sort interlaboratory comparison for determination of ochratoxin a by elisa in maize (running title: determination of ochratoxin a in maize)
publisher Matica srpska
series Zbornik Matice Srpske za Prirodne Nauke
issn 0352-4906
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Participation in interlaboratory comparison and proficiency testing schemes is important for laboratories to control the work quality. In this study, a sample of naturally contaminated maize was analyzed for the content of ochratoxin A (OTA) in three laboratories in Serbia. Participating laboratories used enzymatic immunoaffinity method (ELISA) for the determination of OTA and selection of the ELISA kit was free. Between-laboratory precision was acceptable as evidenced by Cochran’s C test. Moreover, z-scores for all three laboratories were z < ± 2, which is considered acceptable. Used OTA confirmation methods were thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), with fluorescence detector. The results of different methods were comparable. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. TR 031071 i br. OI 172042]
topic confirmation methods
ELISA
interlaboratory comparison
maize
ochratoxin A
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0352-4906/2013/0352-49061324077J.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jaksicsandram interlaboratorycomparisonfordeterminationofochratoxinabyelisainmaizerunningtitledeterminationofochratoxinainmaize
AT jajicigorm interlaboratorycomparisonfordeterminationofochratoxinabyelisainmaizerunningtitledeterminationofochratoxinainmaize
AT nesicksenijad interlaboratorycomparisonfordeterminationofochratoxinabyelisainmaizerunningtitledeterminationofochratoxinainmaize
AT stojanovigorm interlaboratorycomparisonfordeterminationofochratoxinabyelisainmaizerunningtitledeterminationofochratoxinainmaize
AT zivkovbalosmilicam interlaboratorycomparisonfordeterminationofochratoxinabyelisainmaizerunningtitledeterminationofochratoxinainmaize
AT mihaljevzeljkoa interlaboratorycomparisonfordeterminationofochratoxinabyelisainmaizerunningtitledeterminationofochratoxinainmaize
AT abramovicbiljanaf interlaboratorycomparisonfordeterminationofochratoxinabyelisainmaizerunningtitledeterminationofochratoxinainmaize
_version_ 1724361707233476608